Hello,
I have recently done a deployment of Postfix 2.10. It seems that the behaviour
of postfix has changed slightly in the way that it handles the content_filter
variables in the configuration file. We are using content_filter to pass
through the emails to Sophos PureMessage for UNIX like
zen is, for all practical purposes, perfect. You will not get false positives
as everyone in zen is either a confirmed spammer or in the PBL (policy block
list). That is to say, no one in zen should be connecting to your mailserver
to send mail, ever.
http://www.spamhaus.org/zen/
zen
On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 05:58:44AM CEST, LuKreme krem...@kreme.com said:
.
http://www.spamhaus.org/zen/
zen blocks these categories:
SBL Direct UBE sources, spam operations spam services
CSS Direct snowshoe spam sources detected via automation
CBL (3rd party exploits such as proxies,
On 8/20/2013 1:04 AM, Jimmy Stewpot wrote:
Hello,
I have recently done a deployment of Postfix 2.10. It seems that the
behaviour of postfix has changed slightly in the way that it handles the
content_filter variables in the configuration file. We are using
content_filter to pass through
http://www.spamhaus.org/zen/
zen blocks these categories:
SBL Direct UBE sources, spam operations spam services
CSS Direct snowshoe spam sources detected via automation
CBL (3rd party exploits such as proxies, trojans, etc.)
PBL End-user Non-MTA IP addresses set by ISP outbound mail
On Aug 20, 2013 8:03 AM, Erwan David er...@rail.eu.org wrote:
On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 05:58:44AM CEST, LuKreme krem...@kreme.com said:
.
http://www.spamhaus.org/zen/
zen blocks these categories:
SBL Direct UBE sources, spam operations spam services
CSS Direct snowshoe spam
On 8/20/2013 3:06 AM, Grant wrote:
Has anyone had a confirmed false positive with zen.spamhaus.org ?
http://lmgtfy.com/?q=spamhaus+false+positive
--
Stan
Hello,
GMX and web.de started an initiative for secure E-Mail made in
Germany... they turned TLS on.
But in addition to that bold move the did something else that causes
the following errors when they try to send mail to my postfix:
postfix/smtpd[28706]: connect from mout.web.de[212.227.15.14]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am 20.08.2013 11:48, schrieb Sebastian Wiesinger:
This error ONLY occurs with their servers. My question is if
anyone has an idea what could cause this error. My first guess is
that they check certificates for validity and I only have an CACert
* Heiko Wundram modeln...@modelnine.org [2013-08-20 12:09]:
Still delivers fine for me (and my mail-server) running Postfix 2.10.1:
Received: from mout.web.de (mout.web.de [212.227.15.3])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits))
(No client certificate
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am 20.08.2013 12:12, schrieb Sebastian Wiesinger:
* Heiko Wundram modeln...@modelnine.org [2013-08-20 12:09]:
Still delivers fine for me (and my mail-server) running Postfix
2.10.1:
Received: from mout.web.de (mout.web.de [212.227.15.3]) (using
On Aug 20, 2013, at 11:48, Sebastian Wiesinger postfix-us...@ml.karotte.org
wrote:
GMX and web.de started an initiative for secure E-Mail made in
Germany... they turned TLS on.
But in addition to that bold move the did something else that causes
the following errors when they try to send
Em 19-08-2013 18:35, Jeroen Geilman escreveu:
On 08/19/2013 06:24 PM, Marcio Merlone wrote:
I run a mail server for my company with Ubuntu 10.04 LTS and postfix
2.7.0-1ubuntu0.2 and all my users use Thunderbird ESR. We have a
customer running Symantec Messaging Gateway and it converts
* DTNX Postmaster postmas...@dtnx.net [2013-08-20 12:57]:
Self-signed, 2048 bits certificate from our own root. Picks the same cipher
and TLS version as in Heiko's example, it seems. Perhaps it's your
certificate, perhaps your Postfix settings? No odd overrides for the defaults
anywhere,
Whilst this subject is of some interest to many or most Postfix
users, it has departed from being fully on topic here. It would fit
better on a list like SDLU: http://spammers.dontlike.us
[Disclaimer: I am a list moderator at SDLU.)
On Sat, Aug 17, 2013 at 10:39:25AM -0700, Grant wrote:
Jimmy Stewpot:
content_filter = smtp:[127.0.0.1]:2500
[...] However with the same version of Pure Message on a new version
of Postfix we see that the system is seeing localhost as the
from relay which means it goes through the localhost whitelist in
the spam policy...
On all systems that I
for me at least...
--
Best regards,
*/Charles /*
On 2013-08-16 5:22 PM, lcon...@go2france.com lcon...@go2france.com wrote:
postconf mail_version
mail_version = 2.3.3
Good gawd...
The reason no one has responded most likely is because you are using
such an ancient and most importantly unsupported version.
You need to upgrade...
--
Best
On 2013.08.20 10.23, Charles Marcus wrote:
for me at least...
http://www.downforeveryoneorjustme.com/www.postfix.org
On 2013-08-20 10:29 AM, btb b...@bitrate.net wrote:
On 2013.08.20 10.23, Charles Marcus wrote:
for me at least...
http://www.downforeveryoneorjustme.com/www.postfix.org
Well, it is back up now for me, so either it was really down for a few
minutes, or there was some kind of DNS issue local
Greetings
i have an old osx server that was working fine and I noticed that the transport
maps listed in the config are not being followed.
I have one domain name and several imap servers.
first i checked if the format for the map was correct in main.cf ,
hash:/etc/postfix/k12_tm_imap2
I
On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 10:34 PM, Charles Marcus
cmar...@media-brokers.com wrote:
On 2013-08-20 10:29 AM, btb b...@bitrate.net wrote:
On 2013.08.20 10.23, Charles Marcus wrote:
for me at least...
http://www.downforeveryoneorjustme.com/www.postfix.org
Well, it is back up now for me, so
On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 01:27:01PM +0200, Sebastian Wiesinger wrote:
I found the problem... In addition to my normal certificate, I had an
EC certificate.
smtpd_tls_eccert_file=/etc/postfix/certs/cacert-karotte-ec.crt
Though I think OpenSSL will generally detect attempts to configure
a
On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 10:45:44AM -0400, jeffrey j donovan wrote:
Aug 20 10:36:41 imap2 postfix/pipe[3641]: 536D3DC23DA:
to=us...@imap2.mydomain.com, orig_to=user1@mydomain, relay=dovecot,
delay=0.02, delays=0.01/0/0/0.01, dsn=2.0.0, status=sent (delivered via
dovecot service)
As
Charles Marcus:
for me at least...
Try www.postfix.org.
Wietse
jeffrey j donovan:
Aug 20 10:36:41 imap2 postfix/pipe[3641]: 536D3DC23DA:
to=us...@imap2.mydomain.com,
That is us...@imap2.mydomain.com.
us...@mydomain.com smtp:sub1.mydomain.com:25
That is not us...@imap2.mydomain.com
You need to update your virtual aliases or your transport map.
On Aug 20, 2013, at 11:08 AM, wie...@porcupine.org (Wietse Venema) wrote:
jeffrey j donovan:
Aug 20 10:36:41 imap2 postfix/pipe[3641]: 536D3DC23DA:
to=us...@imap2.mydomain.com,
That is us...@imap2.mydomain.com.
us...@mydomain.com smtp:sub1.mydomain.com:25
That is not
On 2013-08-20 11:09 AM, wie...@porcupine.org (Wietse Venema)
wie...@porcupine.org (Wietse Venema) wrote:
Charles Marcus:
for me at least...
Try www.postfix.org.
I did, it was down for about 2 or 3 minutes. By the time someone else
responded, it was back up.
One other person said it was
jeffrey j donovan:
I do have a virtual alias map that i am using for some redirected
mail list. is it because i have no user entry that it delivers
locally ? i thought that it would step down to transport if it did
not find anything.
virtual_alias_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/virtualmm
On Aug 20, 2013, at 11:39 AM, wie...@porcupine.org (Wietse Venema) wrote:
If you rewrite an envelope recipient address X with virtual_alias_maps
(or otherwise) into envelope recipient address Y, then Postfix will
use envelope recipient address Y for transport map lookups.
Therefore you
jeffrey j donovan:
If I do not use a virtual alias map, is a transport map sufficient
by itself or should I always use the two together ? I only ask
this because this was working before I added the alias map. I just
want to be clear that these two work together.
That depends.
First, Postfix
On Aug 20, 2013, at 12:17 PM, Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org wrote:
That depends.
First, Postfix needs to know what domains to receive mail for
(otherwise mail is rejected with relay access denied). You specify
each domain in one of the four domain lists: mydestination,
jeffrey j donovan:
First, Postfix needs to know what domains to receive mail for
(otherwise mail is rejected with relay access denied). You specify
each domain in one of the four domain lists: mydestination,
relay_domains, virtual_alias_domains, or virtual_mailbox_domains.
In addition,
Hello,
The gmail smtp server is now refusing mails from my system when IPv6 is
used, as shown in the log below:
Aug 20 06:25:08 petole postfix/smtp[27705]: Trusted TLS connection established
to gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com[2a00:1450:400c:c03::1b]:25: TLSv1.2 with cipher
ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA
Nicolas KOWALSKI:
I am not able to have an IPv6 rDNS record with my ISP, only an IPv4 one.
I guess this is why it works when using IPv4 (tested by forcing
inet_protocols = ipv4), and does not work any more with IPv6.
Is it possible to have outgoing mail to gmail (or another domain) sent
On 20 Aug 2013, at 05:21 , Marcio Merlone marcio.merl...@a1.ind.br wrote:
Em 19-08-2013 18:35, Jeroen Geilman escreveu:
On 08/19/2013 06:24 PM, Marcio Merlone wrote:
I run a mail server for my company with Ubuntu 10.04 LTS and postfix
2.7.0-1ubuntu0.2 and all my users use Thunderbird ESR. We
Is it possible to use Postfix as a client to an upstream server? And by a
client I mean, can Postfix use auth SMTP to authenticate to that upstream
server and can it use STARTTLS while acting like a client to the upstream
server?
If any of the above questions are yes i there specific
Rob Tanner:
Is it possible to use Postfix as a client to an upstream server?
And by a client I mean, can Postfix use auth SMTP to authenticate
to that upstream server and can it use STARTTLS while acting like
a client to the upstream server?
If any of the above questions are yes i there
38 matches
Mail list logo
