Hi,
I would like to know Your opinion about selinux + postfix ?
Does onyone using it ? Does it make sense to setup some policies for
postfix ?
Thanks in advance for your answers and suggestions.
Cheers
Zalezny
On 11/07/17 19:31, Zalezny Niezalezny wrote:
> I would like to know Your opinion about selinux + postfix ?
>
> Does onyone using it ? Does it make sense to setup some policies for
> postfix ?
It works as well as any other software + selinux. What policies and
label contexts you have to customize
Dear Zalezny,
On 07/11/17 09:31, Zalezny Niezalezny wrote:
I would like to know your opinion about selinux + postfix?
Does anyone using it? Does it make sense to set up some policies for
postfix?
It largely depends on your threat model, but in my opinion, as it
doesn’t hurt, I would say it
Zalezny Niezalezny:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to know Your opinion about selinux + postfix ?
>
> Does onyone using it ? Does it make sense to setup some policies for
> postfix ?
Do what you like, but I won't provide help for platform-specific
features. Postfix is a cross-platform system.
W
I think that Postfix is one of the most secure servers. I will stay with
basic SE settings.
On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 1:01 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Zalezny Niezalezny:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I would like to know Your opinion about selinux + postfix ?
> >
> > Does onyone using it ? Does it make sense t
Hi,
I've posted this as a serverfault [1]question but had no bites so far.
I am receiving about 50 rejected emails per day because there is a typo
in the sending email address and it's hitting
reject_unknown_sender_domain:
Jul 10 12:21:31 serverb3 postfix/smtpd[6647]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT fro
Am 11.07.2017 um 17:21 schrieb Darren Share:
Hi,
I've posted this as a serverfault [1]question but had no bites so far.
I am receiving about 50 rejected emails per day because there is a typo
in the sending email address and it's hitting
reject_unknown_sender_domain:
Jul 10 12:21:31 serverb3 p
Thanks! I will try to reorganise that grouping as well.
On 11/07/2017 16:38, Alex JOST wrote:
> Am 11.07.2017 um 17:21 schrieb Darren Share:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I've posted this as a serverfault [1]question but had no bites so far.
>>
>> I am receiving about 50 rejected emails per day because the
I have a functioning install of 2.10 from rpm's on Centos7. I'm trying to
upgrade the postfix to 2.11.
I don't use LDAP and I'm using Dovecot for SASL. I use TLS. Following the
postfix docs and other's directions, I've tried to pick the correct compile
options. Unfortunately for me RedHat/Cent
techlist06:
> I have a functioning install of 2.10 from rpm's on Centos7. I'm trying to
> upgrade the postfix to 2.11.
>
> I don't use LDAP and I'm using Dovecot for SASL. I use TLS. Following the
> postfix docs and other's directions, I've tried to pick the correct compile
> options. Unfortun
>Do "postfix reload" and see what Postfix version is being logged.
Jul 11 15:58:29 tn2 postfix/postfix-script[17935]: refreshing the Postfix
mail system
Jul 11 15:58:29 tn2 postfix/master[17876]: reload -- version 2.11.10,
configuration /etc/postfix
On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 01:21:44PM -0700, techlist06 wrote:
> make makefiles CCARGS=' -fPIC -DUSE_TLS -DUSE_SSL -DUSE_SASL_AUTH
> -DDEF_SERVER_SASL_TYPE=\"dovecot\" -DPREFIX=\\"/usr\\" -DHAS_PCRE
> -I/usr/include/openssl
> -I/usr/include/dovecot
> -I/usr/include'
Do NOT add "/usr/include/openssl"
techlist06:
> I have a functioning install of 2.10 from rpm's on Centos7. I'm trying to
> upgrade the postfix to 2.11.
>
> I don't use LDAP and I'm using Dovecot for SASL. I use TLS. Following the
> postfix docs and other's directions, I've tried to pick the correct compile
> options. Unfortun
Wietse:
>If I correct your command for word-wrap breakage and spurious spaces,
>but otherwise leave all the unnecessary stuff in place, it produces
>a working build with Postfix 3.3 on Fedora Core 24.
The reference I started with was one by Steve Jenkins for a Centos 7 system
(and others). I'
I removed the one Cyrus SASL path Victor pointed out.
For anyone else who may come on this searching... Google "Steve Jenkins
Building Postfix on RHEL / CentOS from Source" for detailed steps. Except
for me I wanted TLS, Dovecot SASL (no Cyrus), the rest as normal for the
distribution.
On a stoc
On 12/07/17 08:21, techlist06 wrote:
> I have a functioning install of 2.10 from rpm's on Centos7. I'm trying to
> upgrade the postfix to 2.11.
Why are you trying to upgrade from old to slightly less old? The
current stable of postfix is 3.2.2.
If you're afraid of 2.10 being EOL then don't worr
Hi Peter:
> Why are you trying to upgrade from old to slightly less old? The
> current stable of postfix is 3.2.2.
Valid question. It wasn't because of EOL concerns. I was looking to add
the feature available in 2.11+:
postscreen_dnsbl_whitelist_threshold
Beyond that, I was just chicken of
On 12/07/17 15:05, techlist06 wrote:
>> Why are you trying to upgrade from old to slightly less old? The
>> current stable of postfix is 3.2.2.
>
> Valid question. It wasn't because of EOL concerns. I was looking to add
> the feature available in 2.11+:
> postscreen_dnsbl_whitelist_threshold
>
18 matches
Mail list logo
