On 2021-03-31 00:54, Stephen Satchell wrote:
(I might decide to limit "submission" to just the 10.1.1.33 interface,
especially if having two addresses raises a problem.)
submission inet n - y - - smtpd
change to
10.1.1.33:submission inet n - y
On 2021-03-31 17:51, Maurizio Caloro wrote:
SPFIgnoreResults true
SPFSelfValidate true
set both to false
and dont use libspf2
problem is your setup used Sender-ID with is long time depricated
Why would you advise not using libspf2?
Sent from my iPad
> On Mar 31, 2021, at 09:01, Benny Pedersen wrote:
>
> On 2021-03-31 17:51, Maurizio Caloro wrote:
>
>> SPFIgnoreResults true
>> SPFSelfValidate true
>
> set both to false
>
> and dont use libspf2
>
> problem is your setup used Send
On 2021-03-31 18:21, Dan Mahoney wrote:
problem is your setup used Sender-ID with is long time depricated
Why would you advise not using libspf2?
atleast not in opendmarc, sid-milter is imho fine
but it bulds in both cases of depricated Sender-ID
On 31/03/2021 17:29, Benny Pedersen wrote:
On 2021-03-31 18:21, Dan Mahoney wrote:
problem is your setup used Sender-ID with is long time depricated
Why would you advise not using libspf2?
atleast not in opendmarc, sid-milter is imho fine
but it bulds in both cases of depricated Sender-ID
On 2021-03-31 18:33, Dominic Raferd wrote:
On 31/03/2021 17:29, Benny Pedersen wrote:
On 2021-03-31 18:21, Dan Mahoney wrote:
problem is your setup used Sender-ID with is long time depricated
Why would you advise not using libspf2?
atleast not in opendmarc, sid-milter is imho fine
but it bu
After integrate tls 1.2, 1.3 now hopefully the last point I will watch...
Please why i will recieve the following fail from Caloro.ch (that's me)
Mar 31 nmail opendkim[12519]: 7E66B40237: no signing table match for
'mauri...@caloro.ch'
Mar 31 nmail opendkim[12519]: 7E66B40237: no signature da
Dominic Raferd:
On 31/03/2021 17:29, Benny Pedersen wrote:
On 2021-03-31 18:21, Dan Mahoney wrote:
problem is your setup used Sender-ID with is long time depricated
Why would you advise not using libspf2?
atleast not in opendmarc, sid-milter is imho fine
but it bulds in both cases of depric
> On Mar 31, 2021, at 1:09 PM, David Bürgin wrote:
>
> Dominic Raferd:
>> On 31/03/2021 17:29, Benny Pedersen wrote:
>>> On 2021-03-31 18:21, Dan Mahoney wrote:
>>>
> problem is your setup used Sender-ID with is long time depricated
Why would you advise not using libspf2?
>>> atleast
Hi !
I can't send emails while using my android smartphone + outlook.
Using outlook on my windows 10 PC on the same wifi connection works.
Here is the debug log I can get :
Mar 31 23:23:00 mail postfix/submission/smtpd[23279]: >
pop.92-184-97-113.mobile.abo.orange.fr[92.184.97.113]:
On Wed, Mar 31, 2021 at 11:29:04PM +0200, gde...@ngservers.com wrote:
> I can't send emails while using my android smartphone + outlook.
Perhaps your phone is sending SMTP commands with non-ASCII data, but
your Postfix server is not configured to support SMTPUTF8. However,
more likely your phone
Quick question please:
Which does Postfix run first - a milter specified in smtpd_milters or
a check_policy_service in smtpd_recipient_restrictions?
I.e.:
#OpenDKIM
smtpd_milters = inet:127.0.0.1:8891
...
smtpd_recipient_restrictions =
...
# python-policyd-spf
check_policy_
On 2021-04-01 01:43, Simon Wilson wrote:
Quick question please:
Which does Postfix run first - a milter specified in smtpd_milters or
a check_policy_service in smtpd_recipient_restrictions?
milters is run after check policy service, to keep performance at top
- Message from Benny Pedersen -
Date: Thu, 01 Apr 2021 01:50:15 +0200
From: Benny Pedersen
Subject: Re: Milters and policy
To: postfix-users@postfix.org
On 2021-04-01 01:43, Simon Wilson wrote:
Quick question please:
Which does Postfix run first - a milter specified i
Quick question please:
Which does Postfix run first - a milter specified in smtpd_milters or
a check_policy_service in smtpd_recipient_restrictions?
milters is run after check policy service, to keep performance at top
Thank you sir...
I just found this too which helped:
https://groups.goo
On 2021-04-01 02:29, Simon Wilson wrote:
...if multiple milters are called are they run in order specified?
smtpd_milters = inet:127.0.0.1:8891,inet:127.0.0.1:8893
yes
I.e. in the example above if OpenDMARC is to see and trust an
already-run OpenDKIM Authentication-Results header
...if multiple milters are called are they run in order specified?
smtpd_milters = inet:127.0.0.1:8891,inet:127.0.0.1:8893
yes
I.e. in the example above if OpenDMARC is to see and trust an
already-run OpenDKIM Authentication-Results header is the order of
specifying the milters impo
Thx again Viktor for your helpful answer.
I use Outlook on my phone & I don't find anything that allows me to conf the
connection negociation protocol.
I'll investigate on this.
Furthermore, I thought too that my server didn't support UTF8, but a telnet
revealed that it does, as we can see in th
18 matches
Mail list logo