Re: stupid question about ipv4 and ipv6?

On Tue, Mar 29, 2022 at 09:50:43PM +0200, Jack Raats wrote: > I have a postfix server on an ip4 and ipv6 adres. > I'm using clamav-milter for virus scanning. Do I have to use 2 milters, > one for ipv4 and one for ipv6 or can I use only one milter? One is enough. -- Viktor.

stupid question about ipv4 and ipv6?

Hi, I have a postfix server on an ip4 and ipv6 adres. I'm using clamav-milter for virus scanning. Do I have to use 2 milters, one for ipv4 and one for ipv6 or can I use only one milter? Thanks Jack

Re: execvp failure but command seems to be there

No. Thanks. It was a long-leftover 32-bit binary in the wrong place. Sent from my iPhone > On Mar 29, 2022, at 4:23 AM, Wietse Venema wrote: > > Wietse

Re: Why the name Postfix?

Wietse Venema previously_wrote on Mon-28-Mar 22 12:00AM > external name "Postfix". "post" was a different word for "mail", > and "fix" was for Sendmail, the inspiration for my efforts. It is a much cooler sounding name now that its decoded. But in retrospect the meaning is pretty obvious 臘

Re: unexpected: postfix tls deploy-server-cert + smtpd_tls_chain_files

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Hi, Just going to say I banged my head against this wall for months on end - every time I updated certificates (using letsencrypt it's pretty frequent) postfix showed the new certs as active - but external tests still showed certs from over a year

Re: Why the name Postfix?

On Monday, March 28, 2022, 12:01:58 AM GMT+2, Wietse Venema wrote: | the inspiration for my efforts. Thanks for your efforts, Wietse...  and for all your support in the list!!!  Regards.. Pete.  

Re: Why the name Postfix?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Hey, On Sun, 2022-03-27 at 10:59 +0200, Benny Pedersen wrote: > funny from myside: it fixes all known sendmail bugs :) > it did not take m4 configure from it How plebeian, you used m4 to configure sendmail. ️ In all my years administering

Re: Why the name Postfix?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On Sun, 2022-03-27 at 09:08 +0530, Amarjeet Anand wrote: > What’s the story behind choosing the name as “Postfix”? As with all children it's what it's parents chose to call it  - -- Nikolai Lusan -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-

Re: execvp failure but command seems to be there

Roger Klorese: > CentOS 7.9 with SELinux off. > > Log shows: > > Mar 28 11:29:16 divine postfix/pipe[2685]: 21FE73000171E: > to=, relay=sympa, > delay=599, delays=599/0.06/0/0.04, dsn=4.3.0, status=deferred (temporary > failure. Command output: pipe: fatal: pipe_command: execvp >

Re: reject_unknown_helo_hostname

On 2022-03-29 Istvan Prosinger wrote: > the documentation says: > > "Reject the request when the HELO or EHLO hostname has no DNS A or MX > record" > > I'm trying to understand the "or" between the "A" and "MX" words - > will this test reject the transport when any of those records are >

reject_unknown_helo_hostname

Hi guys, the documentation says: "Reject the request when the HELO or EHLO hostname has no DNS A or MX record" I'm trying to understand the "or" between the "A" and "MX" words - will this test reject the transport when any of those records are missing, or when the propagated HELO/EHLO