Re: keeping off brute force password attempts

Hi Ram, You are in the right track. Just add some additional logic to your banning code so it also detects and tracks correct logins. With this information you can easily avoid blocking legitimate IPs (with correct logins) that are just failing to authenticate because old and/or half configured

Re: ASPL: discarding a single recipient or a set of them from a multi-recipient message

s that shouldn't be used, do not install unrecommended software (thus compromising his/her equipment) and do not configure fancy combinations of my-yahoo-account+sasl_user_of_my_isp is function that nearly approximates to 0 -- Francis Brosnan Blázquez <fran...@aspl.es> ASPL 91 134 14

ASPL: discarding a single recipient or a set of them from a multi-recipient message

"already handled/delivered" a particular recipient in a message directly in the queue? 3) Are we wrong or the only solution is to go with a smtp-like content filter that does the recipient removal? Thanks for your time and patience, Best Regards, [1] http://www.aspl.es/valvula --

Re: ASPL: discarding a single recipient or a set of them from a multi-recipient message

postfix/transport: > # The ^ at the beginning is required to avoid false matches. > /^user@/discard: > > Of course this will have collateral damage; it discards mail for > recipients in unrelated domains. > > Wietse -- Francis Brosnan Blázquez <fr

Re: ASPL: discarding a single recipient or a set of them from a multi-recipient message

Hi Wietse, Thanks for your response, > This is how Postfix content filters work: > > postfix1 -> filter -> postfix2 > > The filter takes precedence in postfix1; Just to clarify we are talking about the same thing, "filter" is not a "content filter" taking the mail from postfix and

Re: ASPL: discarding a single recipient or a set of them from a multi-recipient message

Hi Wietse, > transport_maps takes effect ONLY AFTER the filter has processed the message. Ok, so because transport_maps takes effect after filter, do you mean transport_maps declarations will never take effect because at the time filter finished, the delivery attempt was already made? >

Re: ASPL: discarding a single recipient or a set of them from a multi-recipient message

Hi Victor, Thanks for your response, > If your policy service says "FILTER ..." it is setting a > content_filter that preempts transport table routing for *all* > recipients. Ok, thanks for clarifying this. It was one of questions we did but wasn't resolved (from my previous mail): It

Re: ASPL: discarding a single recipient or a set of them from a multi-recipient message

tfix way of doing things). I'll take me time to review this, Thanks for taking your time, Best Regards, [1] http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.mail.postfix.user/250046 -- Francis Brosnan Blázquez <fran...@aspl.es> ASPL 91 134 14 22 - 91 134 14 45 - 91 116 07 57 AVISO LEGAL En virtud