On 3/13/2011 4:57 AM, Frank Bonnet wrote:
Hello
Sorry if this seems a bit off topic ...
Postfix is really a great piece of software
and we all thanks to Wiese for his tremendous work.
Yes it is and it gets better every release.
But to fight spam and all other malicious
problems it's
--- On Tue, 3/10/09, Glen B batch...@bellsouth.net wrote:
From: Glen B batch...@bellsouth.net
Subject: Re: v2.5.5 showq and postcat date/time stamp discrepancy
To: Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org
Date: Tuesday, March 10, 2009, 1:16 PM
--- On Tue, 3/10/09, Wietse Venema
wie
Wietse Venema wrote:
Ben Winslow:
FWIW, my test system uses the system-wide timezone (US/Central)
in the output from mailq and the timezone from $TZ (US/Eastern)
for the output from postcat. This is, IMO, the correct behavior.
I hadn't thought of that (system versus user time zone).
Glen B wrote:
Wietse Venema wrote:
Ben Winslow:
FWIW, my test system uses the system-wide timezone (US/Central)
in the output from mailq and the timezone from $TZ (US/Eastern)
for the output from postcat. This is, IMO, the correct behavior.
I hadn't thought of that (system versus
Hi,
Postfix 2.5.5 on Debian
I've just noticed a discrepancy between showq (postqueue -p) and
postcat. I've looked through the code, played with the conversion code
in postcat and I honestly can not figure out what's going wrong:
-Queue ID- --Size-- Arrival Time
: Friday, February 06, 2009 10:34 PM
To: postfix-users@postfix.org
Subject: Re: mailbox integration questions
On Fri, 06 Feb 2009, Glen B wrote:
I'm working on a DB environment integration with Postfix and
have gotten
TCP dict lookups to function. Now, I'm working on mail delivery and am
I'm working on a DB environment integration with Postfix and have gotten
TCP dict lookups to function. Now, I'm working on mail delivery and am
trying to determine which method of mailbox delivery to take. I have a few
limitations in my application, but for the most part I'm open to all
