On 25 Jul 2012, at 08:20, Ansgar Wiechers wrote:
On 2012-07-25 mouss wrote:
Le 24/07/2012 08:37, Stan Hoeppner a écrit :
You'd think humans beings would be smart enough to follow directions
and use strong passwords, AV software, etc, and not fall for phishing
scams. Your adversary in this
On 25 Jul 2012, at 10:09, Ansgar Wiechers wrote:
Mark,
Please re-read what I wrote, particularly the second half of it. Is
Joseph Zebediah Average 4/1/1999 really a strong password?
It is a strong password, unless you believe attackers would regard that
format as a promising format to
Jack wrote:
Hello All,
I am using CIDR lookups and am getting some warnings when it doesn't like
certain IP blocks in my CIDR list.
The error message seems reasonably clear. You shouldn't have any
non-zero bits after the bit position indicated by the network size (/23
below).
I.e. those
On 27 Oct 2010, at 13:02, Tomasz Chmielewski wrote:
Is it somehow possible to make Postfix add a digital signature to outgoing
emails?
Most likely Postfix itself can't do it, but maybe there is some filter
(similar to amavis, or dkimproxy) which can be used with Postfix, which lets
On 27 Oct 2010, at 13:11, lst_ho...@kwsoft.de wrote:
Zitat von Mark Blackman m...@exonetric.com:
On 27 Oct 2010, at 13:02, Tomasz Chmielewski wrote:
Is it somehow possible to make Postfix add a digital signature to outgoing
emails?
Most likely Postfix itself can't do it, but maybe
On 01/12/2009 14:09, John wrote:
Sorry to bring this here, but we are having trouble setting up a
Postfix/dovecot mail system.
Background:
We are a bunch of retirees, so cost is a factor in any decision. We all
have IT experience, some of going back decades, however the world of
Linux and its
On 19 Oct 2009, at 13:41, Paul Cockings wrote:
What are you trying to achieve?
- why do you want anti-spam on outbound mail?
I'd guess he has little or no control over the configuration
of the internal machines and so he's concerned about malware/botnets
perhaps.
- Mark
smime.p7s
On 17/08/2009 17:01, Guy wrote:
Hi,
I'm using Postfix 2.5.5 with Amavis/CLAM. Also looking at adding
SpamAssassin in the near future. I've also got Postfix Policyd V2 on
my gateways.
I've currently got this all running on Ubuntu (Hardy 8.04) and it's
been fine so far.
I have had one or two
On 14/7/09 12:10, Keld Jørn Simonsen wrote:
OK, here goes:
1) The server replies with good news. Postfix replies with good news.
2) The server replies with bad news. Postfix replies with 5xx.
3) No server reply. Postfix replies with 4xx.
Is this finally clear?
Yes, thanks. But it seems
