acle keeps saying they plan to retire the legacy Dyn
stuff(and say the newer Oracle cloud DNS uses the same Dyn backend),
it's still alive until May 2023 at least.
In any case, outbound DANE does not require anything non-trivial on
your
end.
Good to know, thanks!!
nate
on DNSSEC a few years ago that really ripped it apart
(https://sockpuppet.org/blog/2015/01/15/against-dnssec/). Can't
vouch for accuracy but the person seemed like they knew what they
were talking about. That was of course 7 years ago so maybe things
have changed since.
nate
's just my personal email server.
thanks
nate
ted to TLS on outbound. I expect by the time the
message is in the queue to go outbound it's already passed through
the filtering, and is not filtered again when the message is
transmitted.
thanks
nate
On Fri, 6 Mar 2009, Noel Jones wrote:
Victor Duchovni wrote:
Probably want a ":" in there to make it a valid header:
header_checks.pcre:
if /^Received:/
/\n\tby (smtp\.example\.com \(Postfix\) with ESTMPS?A id \w+)/
REPLACE X-Submitted: to $1
endif
Yes, thanks.
I extrapo
only apply the header_checks to certain mail processes?
I suppose I could do something like 'no_header_body_checks' on the main
SMTP process, but it'd be nice to be able to do some checks there in the
future too.
-Nate
remove
the header altogether or modify the IP to one of the IP's that we own for
all authenticated users that submit mail via 465/587. I'm not finding a
clean way of doing this; hoping someone has been down this road before so
I don't have to reinvent the wheel. ;)
Appreciate any advice - thanks much!
-Nate
ronment, I'd like to ensure that mail
sent via one user cannot affect another user's IP's 'reputation', and I'd
also like the outgoing mail server to match the incoming MX record for the
domain.
Thanks!
-Nate
At 06:45 PM 2/10/2009, post...@corwyn.net wrote:
At 07:22 PM 2/10/2009, Nate wrote:
At 03:53 PM 3/18/2008, you wrote:
Wietse Venema wrote:
We're using SMTP AUTH in postfix, querying the dovecot auth socket
which works well; however, in our virtual hosted environment it
requires
At 03:53 PM 3/18/2008, you wrote:
Wietse Venema wrote:
> There is no reason why this can't be implemented, but I want to
> avoid chaos in Postfix. So I don't want to keep adding more and
> more ad-hoc parameters to the Postfix-to-SASL library interface.
>
> This interface is also used by Cyrus SA
10 matches
Mail list logo
