Carlos Mennens wrote:
Guys I apologize if this doesn't belong here but I did a 'Google'
search and I decided it would be best to ask the community who uses
Postfix from an 'administrative' perspective. I am looking for a
statistics utility for mail. I don't really have any specific
requirements
On 07/03/2010 01:27 PM, /dev/rob0 wrote:
On Sat, Jul 03, 2010 at 02:53:44PM -0500, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
Morten P.D. Stevens put forth on 7/3/2010 2:40 PM:
Does anyone know backported Postfix 2.6.x or 2.7.x RPM packages
for RHEL5?
This binary rpm is for x86-64 only:
On 07/06/2010 09:07 AM, Bas Mevissen wrote:
On Tue, 06 Jul 2010 09:01:53 -0700, Roderick A. Anderson
Love to -- plus I'm dealing with not-64 bit machines -- but I can't find
a RPM for tinycdb I feel comfortable with. All were circa 2002. Is
this OK? What are others using?
\\||/
Rod
Andy Dills wrote:
On Thu, 27 May 2010, Wietse Venema wrote:
Andy Dills:
I've been investigating postscreen, as we've been address probed/bombed
for years, as we have a few domains that are very old (well, early 90s)
that had a lot of users back in the dialup days. Our approach was to just
Wietse Venema wrote:
Roderick A. Anderson:
Also, would postscreen_cache_map work with a mysql backend?
postscreen needs very low latency (I put in explicit tests for
this). Also, postscreen requires read, write, iterate support
which is implemented only for file-based databases.
If table
Daniel L'Hommedieu wrote:
On Mar 28, 2010, at 15:23, Wietse Venema wrote:
BTW, Postfix 2.3 is no longer maintained. It is almost four years old.
Wietse,
After seeing this comment, I decided to see what versions of postfix I have installed.
The RPM available for both CentOS 5 and RHEL5 is
Roderick A. Anderson wrote:
My understanding, from following several threads here and some research,
is the return-path is transmitted out-of-band in the SMTP MAIL request
and placed in the message by the LDA.
How would a proxy determine the value(s) that will be used to create the
Return
Roderick A. Anderson wrote:
Roderick A. Anderson wrote:
My understanding, from following several threads here and some
research, is the return-path is transmitted out-of-band in the SMTP
MAIL request and placed in the message by the LDA.
How would a proxy determine the value(s
Neil Smith wrote:
I run Postfix to handle my personal mail. I also act as a backup MX host for
a friend.
To give him time to return from holiday and fix a broken Postfix installation,
I want to keep messages for the backup domains for up to 21 days. However, I
want undeliverable messages
ghe wrote:
On Aug 22, 2009, at 9:56 AM, Security Admin (NetSec) wrote:
Could someone provide links to sites where IP addresses are grouped by
country? ASNs would work too but would prefer IP lists that I could
put in a file that my postfix mail gateway could read. Obvious
countries like
AMP Admin wrote:
Does anyone use iptables or something to defend against attacks? Like
if x amount of requests per x amount of time send away. If so I would
love some examples. Thanks!
Probably based on Glenn English's work (in another email) I found this
during a brute force search with
Jorey Bump wrote:
Martijn de Munnik wrote, at 08/22/2009 02:06 PM:
I use fail2ban with ipf on Solaris 10. When a host produces to many 5xx
errors or sends to much spam it is banned in the firewall.
failregex = reject: RCPT from (.*)\[HOST\]: 5\d\d
ban time 1h
failregex = Passed SPAM,
And that is as vague as it gets! :-)
I've been looking and searching but just can't seem to find what I'm
looking for.
I need to configure Postfix (and sasl?) so a select group of users from
multiple domains can send email. Originally it was to allow some
users/domains to send email from
With all the traffic recently on DNS and friends I got overloaded and
stopped reading. :-(
But now I've run into a situation that I don't remember seeing addressed.
How will Postfix deal with a machine that has two different names for
the same IP and multiple PTR records?
\\||/
Rod
--
Victor Duchovni wrote:
On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 09:18:07AM -0700, Roderick A. Anderson wrote:
With all the traffic recently on DNS and friends I got overloaded and
stopped reading. :-(
But now I've run into a situation that I don't remember seeing addressed.
How will Postfix deal
Wietse Venema wrote:
Roderick A. Anderson:
With all the traffic recently on DNS and friends I got overloaded and
stopped reading. :-(
But now I've run into a situation that I don't remember seeing addressed.
How will Postfix deal with a machine that has two different names for
Thanks
Ville Walveranta wrote:
Here's the completed script (the IP/CIDR extract worked perfectly --
thanks Barney!):
---
#!/bin/sh
ORIGINAL=/usr/local/etc/postfix/tables/client_access_maps.cidr
NEW=/tmp/postfix_clients.tmp
dig +short senderdomain.net TXT | grep 'v=spf1' | egrep -o
'ip4:[0-9./]+' |
Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
* Brian Collins lis...@newnanutilities.org:
I noticed that Postfix V#2.6.0 is now out. Does anybody know where to
get RPM files? GOOGLE did not help.
Simon Mudd picks up the releases and makes good source and binary RPMs from
them with lots of options. However, he's a
Wade Williams wrote:
I'm having a problem where an installation of Mantis bug tracking
software cannot send mail to external addresses. It sends mail to me
(w...@dogwatchsw.com mailto:w...@dogwatchsw.com) fine. However, it
will not send to external email addresses. I've done a lot of google
James A R Brown wrote:
Hi Alan,
Looks like its not the paths.
I edited /usr/lib/rpm/macros :-
#Path to top of build area.
#%_topdir %(echo $HOME)/rpmbuild
%_topdir/usr/src/redhat
Then I tried again from fresh.
You can see below same error, but new path is being
Wietse Venema wrote:
Roderick A. Anderson:
I keep seeing and having questions on valid parameters and valid values
for them. The Postfix.org site and manual have great listings and this
list has provided excellent info on them.
Still I stay a bit confused as I started with an older version
Victor Duchovni wrote:
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 09:05:28AM -0700, Roderick A. Anderson wrote:
snip /
Well, the only opportunity to respond an SMTP command is in respnse to
*that* command, so originally these took place at the time of the
correspoding SMTP command.
connect
Jim Seymour wrote:
Hi All,
I'm simplifiying my life. Amonst other things, that means I'm dropping
my business class DSL circuit and all of my involvement in projects,
documentation, anti-spam efforts, etc.
If somebody *qualified* wants to officially take over maintenance of
Pflogsumm, please
Everything I'm reading in The Book of Postfix and from the web site
seem to indicate that virtual_mailbox_domains has to be a list of values
in main.cf. Is this correct? Anyway to put them in a file instead?
TIA,
Rod
--
Pablo Scheri wrote:
dig mx trendargentina.com.ar.
; DiG 9.3.3rc2 mx trendargentina.com.ar.
;; global options: printcmd
;; Got answer:
;; -HEADER- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 27701
;; flags: qr aa rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 1, AUTHORITY: 1, ADDITIONAL: 2
;; QUESTION SECTION:
Victor Duchovni wrote:
On Fri, Feb 06, 2009 at 09:11:43AM -0800, Roderick A. Anderson wrote:
mx.trendargentina.com.ar. 0INA10.0.0.208
mx.trendargentina.com.ar. 0INA10.0.0.207
What this says to me is every time Postfix requests the MX for
trendargentina.com.ar the name
Not too clear from the subject and probably a lame idea.
Situation: We have a system (MX1) that is having hardware problems.
Currently they are irritations but we want to rebuild the system before
it really crashes. There are actually two systems so there is back up
(MX2) in case there is a
Roderick A. Anderson wrote:
Not too clear from the subject and probably a lame idea.
Situation: We have a system (MX1) that is having hardware problems.
Currently they are irritations but we want to rebuild the system before
it really crashes. There are actually two systems so there is back
Magnus Bäck wrote:
On Wednesday, December 03, 2008 at 23:06 CET,
Roderick A. Anderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Magnus Bäck wrote:
[...]
You can choose any username you like as long as it matches whatever
is in your credential database. So far we don't know anything about
that. MySQL
I'm trying to test my Postfix/Dovecot set up to determine why (what I'm
doing wrong) a Perl script using Mail::Sender is failing. Errors say
connection failed -- rather ambiguous I'd say! :-)
This is for a system with multiple (virtual?) domains.
I'm using telnet to test but am having a
Magnus Bäck wrote:
On Wednesday, December 03, 2008 at 19:52 CET,
Roderick A. Anderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm trying to test my Postfix/Dovecot set up to determine why (what
I'm doing wrong) a Perl script using Mail::Sender is failing. Errors
say connection failed -- rather
Wietse Venema wrote:
Roderick A. Anderson:
I'm implementing greylisting on CentOS 5 systems.
These are spools for the actual mailserver/mailbox systems.
Currently we have:
smtpd_recipient_restrictions =
reject_unauth_pipelining, cheap
reject_non_fqdn_sender
mouss wrote:
Roderick A. Anderson wrote:
I'm implementing greylisting on CentOS 5 systems.
These are spools for the actual mailserver/mailbox systems.
Currently we have:
smtpd_recipient_restrictions =
reject_unauth_pipelining,
useless.
reject_non_fqdn_sender
mouss wrote:
Roderick A. Anderson wrote:
[snip]
If your problem is that From: equals To:, then Postfix can help
only with an external content filter.
If your problem is that MAIL FROM equals RCPT TO, then Postfix can
help only with an external policy daemon or external content filter
I'm starting to get a lot of SPAM where the Sender matches the To:.
I hear the same from several others. There was the thread recently on
something similar but dealing with lists so it seems to not apply.
I'm at a complete loss after being six pages into a search using
Google.com with
Wietse Venema wrote:
Roderick A. Anderson:
I'm starting to get a lot of SPAM where the Sender matches the To:.
You mean, the From: and To: headers, or the MAIL FROM and the RCPT
TO address in SMTP commands?
One of these days I'll stating thinking in the correct terms. Probably
about
36 matches
Mail list logo
