Re: REDIRECT with multiple recipients

On 03/03/15 11:09, Koko Wijatmoko wrote: On Tue, 03 Mar 2015 10:58:20 +0100 Rudy Gevaert wrote: Could someone tell me if there any other differences between using u...@domain.com REJECT The user has moved and a relocated map with: u...@domain.com The user has moved There is no "REJEC

Re: REDIRECT with multiple recipients

On 03/03/15 10:00, Rudy Gevaert wrote: Thanks for the possible alternatives. In this case I chose to go with the REDIRECT because we have an option to also do REJECT. (User can chose to redirect or reject through a webinterface). It was nice to do it in one lookup. I didn't see i

Re: REDIRECT with multiple recipients

On 03/02/15 17:37, Viktor Dukhovni wrote: On Mon, Mar 02, 2015 at 11:26:14AM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote: If you want to *replace* those recipients, you could use /etc/postfix/main.cf: recipient_canonical_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/recipient_canonical recipient_canonical_classes = envel

REDIRECT with multiple recipients

Hallo, I configured smtpd_recipient_restrictions to look in an access table. I was intending to use the REDIRECT statement to redirect mails for certain recipients. unfortunately, after a selected roll out into production we noticed that this has issues for messages sent to multiple recipie

Re: PATCH: access map for sasl authenticated users

On 10/29/2013 01:11 AM, Wietse Venema wrote: . I have a patch that should also work with other Postfix releases at ftp://ftp.porcupine.org/mirrors/postfix-release/experimental/feature-patches/20131028-check-sasl-access-patch I saw there was a newer one ftp://ftp.porcupine.org/mirrors/postfix

Re: postfix access map for sasl authenticated users

Quoting wie...@porcupine.org (Wietse Venema), Fri, 25 Oct 2013: Rudy Gevaert: Hello, I was wondering if I could add a access map (to deny access in fact) for specific sasl authenticated users? Adding check_sasl_sender_access support would not be difficult. It just hasn't been don

postfix access map for sasl authenticated users

Hello, I was wondering if I could add a access map (to deny access in fact) for specific sasl authenticated users? E.g. even if the login succeeds that user can't send email. I couldn't find anything in the docs, but maybe I'm looking in the wrong place. Thanks, Rudy

Re: segfault when running postconf on Solaris

On 04/04/2011 07:16 PM, Wietse Venema wrote: Rudy Gevaert: Hello list, I am getting a segfault when I run postconf on Solaris 10 SunOS horus 5.10 Generic_142910-17 i86pc i386 i86pc postconf -n doesn't segfault! running it with truss: smtpd_discard_ehlo_keyword_address

segfault when running postconf on Solaris

Hello list, I am getting a segfault when I run postconf on Solaris 10 SunOS horus 5.10 Generic_142910-17 i86pc i386 i86pc postconf -n doesn't segfault! running it with truss: smtpd_discard_ehlo_keyword_address_maps = smtpd_discard_ehlo_keywords = smtpd_end_of_data_restrictions14374:write(

Re: canonical rewriting From header?

Dear Wietse, On 06/14/2010 09:54 PM, Wietse Venema wrote: Rudy Gevaert: Thank you for your help Wietse! Quoting "Wietse Venema": It will not, because you have receive_override_options = no_address_mappings This of course explains it! I now figure that I need to put, sev

Re: canonical rewriting From header?

? For the time being it is empty for each service. -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Rudy Gevaert e-mail: rudy.geva...@ugent.be Directie ICT, Afdeling Infrastructuur Groep Systemen tel: +32

Re: canonical rewriting From header?

Sorry if am missing some obvious here!! Thanks in advance, Rudy -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Rudy Gevaert e-mail: rudy.geva...@ugent.be Directie ICT, Afdeling Infrastructuur Groep Systemen

Re: canonical rewriting From header?

Dear Wietse, Please find below and in attachment the necessary information. On 06/11/2010 03:31 PM, Wietse Venema wrote: I'll consider looking into this after I see one posting with: - postconf -n output. Please see attachment - Configuration parameters (-o name=value) in master.cf. Plea

Re: canonical rewriting From header?

Quoting "Wietse Venema" : Rudy Gevaert: Dear list, It recently came to my attention that our canonical rewriting had stopped working. Further inspection led me to the information on the site that default behaviour was changed in Postfix 2.2. Fine no problem, I should have seen it

canonical rewriting From header?

Dear list, It recently came to my attention that our canonical rewriting had stopped working. Further inspection led me to the information on the site that default behaviour was changed in Postfix 2.2. Fine no problem, I should have seen it. As this is already couple of years ago and nobod

Re: hold queue management

Wietse Venema wrote: Rudy Gevaert: Hello postfix users, I have question concerning the hold queue. I have a smtpd_*_restriction map that puts certain mails in the hold queue. (E.g. phishing messages). My idea was to then update the restriction to DISCARD or REJECT the message and to move the

hold queue management

Hello postfix users, I have question concerning the hold queue. I have a smtpd_*_restriction map that puts certain mails in the hold queue. (E.g. phishing messages). My idea was to then update the restriction to DISCARD or REJECT the message and to move the mails out of the hold queue. However

selective strict_rfc821_envelopes ?

-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Rudy Gevaert rudy.geva...@ugent.be tel:+32 9 264 4734 Directie ICT, afd. Infrastructuur Direction ICT, Infrastructure dept. Groep Systemen Systems group Universiteit Gent

selective strict_rfc821_envelopes ?

-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Rudy Gevaert rudy.geva...@ugent.be tel:+32 9 264 4734 Directie ICT, afd. Infrastructuur Direction ICT, Infrastructure dept. Groep Systemen Systems group Universiteit Gent

Re: smtp_helo_name from file appends . to hostname

Citeren Wietse Venema : Rudy Gevaert: Dear list, This morning I stumbled upon a strange problem. Mail delivery to an exchange backend did not work: refused to talk to me: 501 5.5.4 Invalid Address) After some troubleshooting an googling I found http://support.microsoft.com/kb/291828

smtp_helo_name from file appends . to hostname

the smtp_helo_name (or with e.g. myorigin) it appends a '.' to the end of the hostname. And according to the rfc this isn't allowed. Why is postfix appending the . ? Thanks in advance, -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --

selective milter possible?

Hello, I was looking for a way to do selective milter. Meaning if a specific host connects I send it trough the milter. I couldn't find it however. Is it possible? Thanks in advance, -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Rudy Ge

stopping UCE with postfix

ne use one (or more) milter/policy servers or a combination of both, completed with the basic postfix checks.? Where should the line be drawn Thanks in advance, -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Rudy Gevaert rudy.geva...@ugent.be tel:+32

Re: lmtp port in 2.1.5 vs 2.3.8

Wietse Venema wrote: Rudy Gevaert: Hi, Previously we were running postfix 2.1.5 (Debian Sarge) and now have upgraded to 2.3.8 (Etch). We have several lmtp transports in master.cf: mail1 unix - - n - - lmtp mail2 unix - - n

lmtp port in 2.1.5 vs 2.3.8

transport: result_format = %s:2003 I was wondering why this was changed, or did I miss something? Thanks in advance, -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Rudy Gevaert [EMAIL PROTECTED] tel:+32 9 264 4734 Directie ICT, afd. Infrastructuur ICT