Re: problem with dspam

Le jeudi 22 décembre 2011 22:19, Andreas Berton a écrit : On Tue, 20 Dec 2011, fakessh @ wrote: hello list hello geek hello guru hello Fu I have done tests on my smtp server used to dspam. after problems of housing road I realized that dspam removes Return-Path header my

Re: problem with dspam

Le dimanche 25 décembre 2011 06:06, fakessh @ a écrit : Le jeudi 22 décembre 2011 22:19, Andreas Berton a écrit : On Tue, 20 Dec 2011, fakessh @ wrote: hello list hello geek hello guru hello Fu Hi Problem usually occur when you run dspam from pipe, and my guess is that you do

problem with dspam

postfix release with other tools sincerely your --  http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=getsearch=0x092164A7  gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-key 092164A7  http://urlshort.eu fakessh @ http://gplus.to/sshfake http://gplus.to/sshswilting http://gplus.to/john.swilting pgpCgw5pKqlj6

Re: My unqualified host name (servername) unknown; sleeping for retry

:11371/pks/lookup?op=getsearch=0x092164A7  gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-key 092164A7  http://urlshort.eu fakessh @ pgpf1R4y9nfK0.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: Sender-ID validation via Blackberry failing

Le mardi 10 mai 2011 15:25, Sharma, Ashish a écrit : -Original Message- From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [mailto:owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of fake...@fakessh.eu Sent: Saturday, January 29, 2011 9:11 PM To: postfix-users@postfix.org Subject: Re: Sender-ID

Re: Sender-ID validation via Blackberry failing

On Tue, 10 May 2011 17:38:29 +0200, fakessh wrote: Le mardi 10 mai 2011 15:25, Sharma, Ashish a écrit : -Original Message- From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [mailto:owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of fake...@fakessh.eu Sent: Saturday, January 29, 2011 9:11 PM

Re: milter postfix for the geolocation addresses and headers X-Anti-Abuse

Le lundi 2 mai 2011 17:22, Wietse Venema a écrit : fakessh: hello list hello gurus hello ? Wietse Venema a) Free crystal balls. yes I possess crystal balls some nice numbers thank you b) Free telepathic services. yes I possess powers parapsychic I discuss with a large Indian

mimedefang and sid-filter

hi wieste hi mouss hi all the guru of postfix since I said I have mimedefang headers X-SenderID are no longer present you have an explanation -- http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=getsearch=0x092164A7 gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-key 092164A7 pgp07QNePMLiK.pgp Description: PGP

Re: mimedefang and sid-filter

Le samedi 30 avril 2011 15:41, Patrick Ben Koetter a écrit : * fakessh fake...@fakessh.eu: hi wieste If you use vim, please put this line in your ~/.vimrc: ab wieste Wietse p@rick hello I had my way the programmer exception hello Wieste -- http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op

Re: mimedefang and sid-filter

Le samedi 30 avril 2011 16:02, Reindl Harald a écrit : Am 30.04.2011 15:57, schrieb fakessh: Le samedi 30 avril 2011 15:41, Patrick Ben Koetter a écrit : * fakessh fake...@fakessh.eu: jesus christ Wietse not wieste nor Wieste :-) hello Wietse Venema and my problem ? -- http

Re: Postfix 2.7.0 and yaa 0.3

Le mardi 26 avril 2011 11:28, Peter L. Hansen a écrit : Hi List, Iam having trouble trying to adding autoreply/autoresponder/outofoffice functionality to our setup. me i use sieve Can i configure postfix to send the proper headers? Thanks, Peter Hansen --

only accept EHLO and I see that I refuse a lot of legitimate mail

hello postfix guru hello Wieste and other develloper I already post a question asking for more. how to allow both HELO and EHLO. I currently only accept EHLO and I see that I refuse a lot of legitimate mail my postconf -n r13151 ~]# postconf -n alias_database = hash:/etc/aliases ,

Re: only accept EHLO and I see that I refuse a lot of legitimate mail

I just changed this option smtp_tls_note_starttls_offer = may that it's OK or not OK thanks Le dimanche 24 avril 2011 22:10, fakessh a écrit : hello postfix guru hello Wieste and other develloper I already post a question asking for more. how to allow both HELO and EHLO. I currently

Re: only accept EHLO and I see that I refuse a lot of legitimate mail

Le dimanche 24 avril 2011 22:37, fakessh a écrit : I just changed this option smtp_tls_note_starttls_offer = may that it's OK or not OK thanks i just reread the doc and I think he must use smtpd_tls_security_level = may it's OK wieste ? thanks ... s /// Le dimanche 24 avril 2011

Re: only accept EHLO and I see that I refuse a lot of legitimate mail

? the following should be enough! smtpd_helo_required = yes smtpd_helo_restrictions = permit_mynetworks reject_non_fqdn_helo_hostname reject_invalid_helo_hostname reject_unknown_helo_hostname Am 24.04.2011 22:37, schrieb fakessh: I just changed this option

Re: only accept EHLO and I see that I refuse a lot of legitimate mail

Le dimanche 24 avril 2011 22:53, Reindl Harald a écrit : smtpd_helo_required  = yes I follow the advice given to me I just added this option smtpd_helo_required = yes -- http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=getsearch=0x092164A7 gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-key 092164A7

Re: how add X-AntiAbuse header

Le lundi 18 avril 2011 03:27, Noel Jones a écrit : On 4/17/2011 6:28 PM, fakessh wrote: hello postfix guru hello wieste hello mouss I would like to add anti-abuse headers. I just spent a good little time to watch list archives and found no answers example of a header that I

Re: how add X-AntiAbuse header

Le lundi 18 avril 2011 14:16, Noel Jones a écrit : On 4/18/2011 6:46 AM, fakessh wrote: Le lundi 18 avril 2011 13:10, Morten P.D. Stevens a écrit : 2011/4/18 fakesshfake...@fakessh.eu: I would like to add anti-abuse headers. I just spent a good little time to watch list archives and found

Re: how add X-AntiAbuse header

Le mardi 19 avril 2011 01:22, fakessh a écrit : Le lundi 18 avril 2011 14:16, Noel Jones a écrit : On 4/18/2011 6:46 AM, fakessh wrote: Le lundi 18 avril 2011 13:10, Morten P.D. Stevens a écrit : 2011/4/18 fakesshfake...@fakessh.eu: I would like to add anti-abuse headers. I just spent

how add X-AntiAbuse header

hello postfix guru hello wieste hello mouss I would like to add anti-abuse headers. I just spent a good little time to watch list archives and found no answers example of a header that I want to appear in my mail X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any

Re: Postfix 2.7.3, 2.6.9, 2.5.12 and 2.4.16 available

when is it the official rpm. Simon Mudd the new rpms are still not present Le lundi 07 mars 2011 à 15:18 -0500, Wietse Venema a écrit : [An on-line version of this announcement will be available at http://www.postfix.org/announcements/postfix-2.7.3.html] Postfix legacy releases 2.7.3,

Re: Kernel Oops

it is necessary to consider the option parent_domain_matches_subdomains = Le mardi 08 mars 2011 à 00:45 +0100, mouss a écrit : Le 07/03/2011 15:13, Stan Hoeppner a écrit : Noel Jones put forth on 3/7/2011 7:00 AM: On 3/7/2011 4:47 AM, Stan Hoeppner wrote: I was taught to always start my

Re: Outbound relayhost distribution

the quantity of deferred is yahoo response : this as that that is this Le vendredi 25 février 2011 à 15:29 -0800, Robert Goodyear a écrit : On Feb 25, 2011, at 2:58 PM, Victor Duchovni wrote: On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 02:38:16PM -0800, Robert Goodyear wrote: Have you seen problem relays in

probleme ipv6

postfix network hello, hello Wieste. I think I have successfully configure ipv6 on my server anyway dig answer seems good. ~]$ dig fakessh.eu @8.8.8.8 +short 2001:41d0:2:3dd6:1234:5678:9abc:def0 and yet sometimes I don not connect to my postfix ipv6 source I have read the manual and

probleme ipv6

Hello postfix network. I encounter problems in configuring ipv6. I documented on the page but I don http://www.postfix.org/IPV6_README.html happens not connect in ipv6 on my mail server. My ISP does not support ipv6 I found the error in the ipv6 by visiting http://dnscheck.iis.se/ he tells me

Re: probleme ipv6

: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 What is the error that you received? If your ISP does not support IPv6 you will not be able to use IPv6 connectivity unless you have a PoP tunnel or some other type of IPv4-to-IPv6 tunnel going on. On 1/20/11 6:50 PM, fakessh @ wrote: Hello

Re: How not to reject invalid recipient domains (here: aol.com)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Le 21.12.2010 10:01, Wolfgang Zeikat a écrit : Hi, apparently, aol.com is currently not resolved via DNS (at least in Germany). How can I have postfix queue mails to AOL and retry delivery in that case instead of bouncing the mails?

Re: Compile error

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Le 15.12.2010 19:22, Eero Volotinen a écrit : 2010/12/15 M. Rodrigo Monteiro fale...@rodrigomonteiro.net: Hi! I'm tryind to compile Postfix with Dovecot support. Why? Can't you just take precompiled binary? -- Eero i try with succes

Re: Upgrade version 2.5.5 to 2.7.1

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Le 01.12.2010 21:49, Stan Hoeppner a écrit : Bruno Costacurta put forth on 12/1/2010 2:19 PM: Hello, I intend to upgrade Postfix version 2.5.5 to 2.7.1. Are there incompatibilities or specific path for upgrade ? Or any manual re-configuration to

Re: [OFF-TOPIC] Does 2.7 RPM Work on RHEL 6?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Le 11.11.2010 22:10, Voytek Eymont a écrit : On Fri, November 12, 2010 6:16 am, Carlos Mennens wrote: On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 2:07 PM, Victor Duchovni victor.ducho...@morganstanley.com wrote: This would be no problem except I've never

Re: Postfix not create Maildir

you must create them by hand or you have to use plugins dovecot and sieve anonymous Le vendredi 08 octobre 2010 à 19:11 -0300, Márcio Luciano Donada a écrit : I am configuring a server to read a basic ldap, everything is working wonders, but to deliver the e-mail, postfix is not creating the

Re: rejecting clients greeting me with my own name

i hijacked the server with the null sender and the valid recipient the mail go home anonymous nb : hey madduck Le lundi 04 octobre 2010 à 20:44 +0200, martin f krafft a écrit : also sprach Charles Marcus cmar...@media-brokers.com [2010.10.04.2029 +0200]: Yes, with my IP. So your

migration postfix vers latest release

hello postfix network hello wieste hello mouss hello all the reader of this list I wish to migrate postfix-2.5.4-1 to the latest version of postfix from rpm Official I desire to know the good manners to do I walk the couple clamd spamassassin postfix postgrey dovecot policyd sid-milter

Re: SPF and greylisting conditioning

Le dimanche 26 septembre 2010 22:38, mouss a écrit : Le 26/09/2010 12:08, Stan Hoeppner a écrit : Michal Bruncko put forth on 9/26/2010 4:24 AM: It is possible in some way to configure postfix, that SPF Passed mails will be automatically accepted with postfix without greylisting? If I

Re: SPF and greylisting conditioning

Le dimanche 26 septembre 2010 23:46, mouss a écrit : Le 26/09/2010 23:28, fakessh a écrit : Le dimanche 26 septembre 2010 22:38, mouss a écrit : Le 26/09/2010 12:08, Stan Hoeppner a écrit : Michal Bruncko put forth on 9/26/2010 4:24 AM: It is possible in some way to configure postfix

Re: Please Help Me Secure My Mail Server

On Mon, 20 Sep 2010 15:56:35 -0500, Noel Jones njo...@megan.vbhcs.org wrote: On 9/20/2010 3:29 PM, bper wrote: Hello, I have set up a postfix-dovecot server with smtp-auth using sasl by following this link: https://help.ubuntu.com/10.04/serverguide/C/postfix.html It seems to be working

Re: force startssl on port 25

On Wed, 15 Sep 2010 23:53:03 +0200, mouss mo...@ml.netoyen.net wrote: Le 14/09/2010 19:11, fakessh a écrit : hi guru of postfix hi mouss and wieste hi all the users of ths list my question is simply is there a way to force startssl on port 25 or it is not a good method the short

force startssl on port 25

hi guru of postfix hi mouss and wieste hi all the users of ths list my question is simply is there a way to force startssl on port 25 or it is not a good method many returns are welcome

Re: force startssl on port 25

On Tue, 14 Sep 2010 13:17:56 -0400, Matt Hayes domin...@slackadelic.com wrote: On 9/14/2010 1:11 PM, fakessh wrote: hi guru of postfix hi mouss and wieste hi all the users of ths list my question is simply is there a way to force startssl on port 25 or it is not a good method many

misunderstanding of some connections

hi all hi folks hi wieste : the saincristain of postfix hi all the postfix network I consult regularly logs postfix I consult regularly logs postfix, and he appears regularly attempts to connect mx3.mail2000.com.tw and that is that I do not understand how it happens I have the following rules

Re: How to drop the recipient address hostname when delivering mail via LMTP?

On Fri, 27 Aug 2010 12:22:59 -0400, Victor Duchovni victor.ducho...@morganstanley.com wrote: On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 10:58:37AM -0500, Noel Jones wrote: I think the problem is better solved in the delivery agent. If you're using the postfix LMTP client, this might work:

Re: OT: sid-milter package

On Fri, 25 Jun 2010 23:39:18 +0200, mouss mo...@ml.netoyen.net wrote: Jorge Andrea G Carminati a écrit : Hi all! I'm trying to implement sid-milter with Postfix 2.7, but am having some problems while trying to compile release 1.0 under RHEL 5.5 (x86_64) as shown below, any ideas? you need

trouble on my rules check_client_access hash:/etc/postf ix/acces_client

hello ladies and gents I do not know if I am in error or in the real i a file check_client_access hash:/etc/postfix/acces_client cat /etc/postfix/acces_client mx3.mail2000.com.tw REJECT mx2.mail2000.com.tw REJECT mx2.mail.tw.yahoo.com REJECT I forbid the property

Re: trouble on my rules check_client_access hash:/etc/p ostfix/acces_client

On Thu, 24 Jun 2010 10:09:35 +0200, fakessh fake...@fakessh.eu wrote: hello ladies and gents I do not know if I am in error or in the real i a file check_client_access hash:/etc/postfix/acces_client cat /etc/postfix/acces_client mx3.mail2000.com.tw REJECT mx2.mail2000.com.tw

Re: trouble on my rules check_client_access hash:/etc/p ostfix/acces_client

On Thu, 24 Jun 2010 11:03:18 +0200, fakessh fake...@fakessh.eu wrote: On Thu, 24 Jun 2010 10:09:35 +0200, fakessh fake...@fakessh.eu wrote: hello ladies and gents I do not know if I am in error or in the real i a file check_client_access hash:/etc/postfix/acces_client cat /etc/postfix

Re: wieste is a women . when do you

On Mon, 21 Jun 2010 00:41:21 +0200, fakessh fake...@fakessh.eu wrote: hello wieste is a women . when do you its my real @ i respond a you post duplicate in french please http://www.google.fr/search?q=wieste+is+a+womanhl=frclient=safarirls=enei=Z44fTL76NMeS4gbxxZWWDgstart=50sa=N http

wieste is a women . when do you

hello wieste is a women . when do you its my real @ i respond a you post duplicate in french please

Re: Postini, Has bad idea for adding ip numbers. This is sendmail example

postini give access telnet postini 25 mail from:herc...@hercule.eu rcpt to:youareinh...@youareinhome.fr data some date . emails is correctly delivred its synonymy to open relay

probleme with dk dkim and dlv for miltiple domain

hello all hello postfix network hello centos network I am having problems with my dk and dkim signature of my emails I have successfully made the process of verification of signatures dnssec all my domains are correct and good displays on dlv.isc.org the reason for my problem just the reason

hello postfix network : with dovecot deliver amavisd not work

hello all reader hello list hello postfix network since I've installed dovecot deliver. e-mails no longer pass through amavisd. amavisd no longer work. c is to say I have no anti-spam and anti virus my postconf and dovecot -n [r...@r13151 ~]# postconf -n alias_database = hash:/etc/aliases ,

are you there a official version of centos postfix most days can be redhat

hello postfix network are you there a official version of centos postfix most days can be redhat this actual version is [r...@r13151 ~]# rpm -qa | grep postfix postfix-pflogsumm-2.3.3-2.1.el5_2 postfix-2.3.3-2.1.el5_2 This version is outdated and is no longer supported how to keep the upstream

RE: are you there a official version of centos postfix most days can be redhat

On Fri, 21 May 2010 21:06:37 -0700, Gary Smith gary.sm...@holdstead.com wrote: hello postfix network are you there a official version of centos postfix most days can be redhat this actual version is [r...@r13151 ~]# rpm -qa | grep postfix postfix-pflogsumm-2.3.3-2.1.el5_2

Re: catch-all not working with postfix dovecot lda

On Sat, 17 Apr 2010 14:26:22 +0200, mouss mo...@ml.netoyen.net wrote: fakessh a écrit : On Thu, 15 Apr 2010 08:33:43 -0500, Noel Jones njo...@megan.vbhcs.org wrote: On 4/14/2010 3:42 PM, fakessh wrote: On Wed, 14 Apr 2010 13:50:34 -0500, Noel Jonesnjo...@megan.vbhcs.org wrote: On 4/14/2010

Re: catch-all not working with postfix dovecot lda

On Sat, 17 Apr 2010 17:16:04 +0200, mouss mo...@ml.netoyen.net wrote: fakessh a écrit : On Sat, 17 Apr 2010 14:26:22 +0200, mouss mo...@ml.netoyen.net wrote: fakessh a écrit : On Thu, 15 Apr 2010 08:33:43 -0500, Noel Jones njo...@megan.vbhcs.org wrote: On 4/14/2010 3:42 PM, fakessh wrote

Re: catch-all not working with postfix dovecot lda

On Sat, 17 Apr 2010 17:29:04 +0200, fakessh fake...@fakessh.eu wrote: On Sat, 17 Apr 2010 17:16:04 +0200, mouss mo...@ml.netoyen.net wrote: fakessh a écrit : On Sat, 17 Apr 2010 14:26:22 +0200, mouss mo...@ml.netoyen.net wrote: fakessh a écrit : On Thu, 15 Apr 2010 08:33:43 -0500, Noel Jones

Fwd: Re: [Dovecot] catch-all not working with postfix dovecot lda

12:39:24 +1000 From: Noel Butler noel.but...@ausics.net To: Dovecot Mailing List dove...@dovecot.org On Fri, 2010-04-16 at 03:50 +0200, fakessh wrote: On Fri, 16 Apr 2010 01:53:32 +0200, Pascal Volk user+dove...@localhost.localdomain.org wrote: On 04/16/2010 01:18 AM fakessh wrote: how

Re: catch-all not working with postfix dovecot lda

On Thu, 15 Apr 2010 08:33:43 -0500, Noel Jones njo...@megan.vbhcs.org wrote: On 4/14/2010 3:42 PM, fakessh wrote: On Wed, 14 Apr 2010 13:50:34 -0500, Noel Jonesnjo...@megan.vbhcs.org wrote: On 4/14/2010 1:45 PM, fakessh wrote: On Wed, 14 Apr 2010 14:12:25 -0400, Charles Marcus cmar...@media

Re: catch-all not working with postfix dovecot lda

On Fri, 16 Apr 2010 00:26:25 +0200, fakessh fake...@fakessh.eu wrote: On Thu, 15 Apr 2010 08:33:43 -0500, Noel Jones njo...@megan.vbhcs.org wrote: On 4/14/2010 3:42 PM, fakessh wrote: On Wed, 14 Apr 2010 13:50:34 -0500, Noel Jonesnjo...@megan.vbhcs.org wrote: On 4/14/2010 1:45 PM, fakessh

Re: [Dovecot] catch-all not working with postfix dovecot lda

a catch-all with dovecot lda the question then. is not a postfix issue On Fri, 2010-04-16 at 01:00 +0200, fakessh wrote: its tha archive to the cross post to postfix-users help me http://www.mail-archive.com/postfix-users@postfix.org/msg22963.html On Fri, 16 Apr 2010 00:26:25 +0200

Fwd: Re: [Dovecot] catch-all not working with postfix dovecot lda (fwd)

dovecot deliver assumes the MTA has verified the user to accept mail from and does not do further authentication how to build a catch-all with dovecot lda the question then. is not a postfix issue On Fri, 2010-04-16 at 01:00 +0200, fakessh wrote: its tha archive to the cross post to postfix

catch-all not working with postfix dovecot lda

fakessh a écrit : On Tue, 13 Apr 2010 18:38:28 -0300, Egberto Monteiro servido...@futuro.usp.br wrote: Apr 13 23:31:35 r13151 postfix/trivial-rewrite[5504]: warning: do not list domain fakessh.eu in *BOTH *mydestination and virtual_alias_domains this error I do not know how to correct

Re: catch-all not working with postfix dovecot lda

On Wed, 14 Apr 2010 15:07:51 +, d.h...@yournetplus.com wrote: Quoting fakessh fake...@fakessh.eu: fakessh a écrit : On Tue, 13 Apr 2010 18:38:28 -0300, Egberto Monteiro servido...@futuro.usp.br wrote: Apr 13 23:31:35 r13151 postfix/trivial-rewrite[5504]: warning: do not list domain

Re: catch-all not working with postfix dovecot lda

On Wed, 14 Apr 2010 14:12:25 -0400, Charles Marcus cmar...@media-brokers.com wrote: On 2010-04-14 1:47 PM, fakessh wrote: correct to this error my log Please do NOT send verbose logs unless requested to do so... Disable verbose logging, and then provide a complete log transaction of ONLY

Re: catch-all not working with postfix dovecot lda

On Wed, 14 Apr 2010 13:50:34 -0500, Noel Jones njo...@megan.vbhcs.org wrote: On 4/14/2010 1:45 PM, fakessh wrote: On Wed, 14 Apr 2010 14:12:25 -0400, Charles Marcus cmar...@media-brokers.com wrote: I changed the entries @fakessh to r...@localhost in /etc/postfix/virtual postmap then a file

catch-all not working with postfix dovecot lda

hello all hello list hello much many people hello wieste the catch-all does not seem to work. I, however, a proper definition of it in /etc/postfix/virtual postconf -n [r...@r13151 ~]# postconf -n alias_maps = hash:/etc/aliases body_checks = regexp:/etc/postfix/body_checks.cf

Re: catch-all not working with postfix dovecot lda

On Tue, 13 Apr 2010 16:02:01 -0500, Noel Jones njo...@megan.vbhcs.org wrote: On 4/13/2010 3:34 PM, fakessh wrote: hello all hello list hello much many people hello wieste the catch-all does not seem to work. Doesn't work in what way? Show logs of what happens vs. what you expect

Re: catch-all not working with postfix dovecot lda

correctly with that error fakessh wrote: On Tue, 13 Apr 2010 16:02:01 -0500, Noel Jones njo...@megan.vbhcs.org wrote: On 4/13/2010 3:34 PM, fakessh wrote: hello all hello list hello much many people hello wieste the catch-all does not seem to work. Doesn't work in what

Fwd: Re: Consolidating Virtual Domain Delivery

Original Message Subject: Re: Consolidating Virtual Domain Delivery Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2010 00:14:43 +0200 From: fakessh fake...@fakessh.eu To: Roderick A. Anderson raand...@cyber-office.net On Sun, 28 Mar 2010 15:00:08 -0700, Roderick A. Anderson raand...@cyber-office.net

Re: Reject_unlisted_recipient issue

-OF-MESSAGE from localhost.localdomain[127.0.0.1]: 5.7.1 can't identify domain in `MAILER-DAEMON'; from= to=fake...@fakessh.eu proto=SMTP helo=fakessh.eu Mar 19 22:11:10 r13151 dovecot: imap-login: Login: user=fakessh, method=PLAIN, rip=127.0.0.1, lip=127.0.0.1, TLS Mar 19 22:11:11 r13151 dovecot: IMAP

my postfix are banned ALERTE VIRii

1 messages rejected with banned file names. Banned File Names: .exe,.exe-unix,scellius_600_PLUGIN_linux-2.6.9/bin/request: 1 Times(s) From: 209.85.220.217 1 Time(s) ALERTE ALERTE Virii

Re: suitable webmail

On Mon, 01 Feb 2010 20:39:49 +0100, mouss mo...@ml.netoyen.net wrote: j debert a écrit : it seems that roundcube is popular. It seems to be most popular among bots as well, according to what my apache logs say. I don't have roundcube but there are frequent attempts to get to php scripts

Re: [OT] suitable webmail

On Mon, 01 Feb 2010 17:17:49 -0500, Charles Marcus cmar...@media-brokers.com wrote: On 2010-02-01 4:05 PM, Stan Hoeppner wrote: My Roundcube package is currently up to date, and it is a standard Debian package: [02:21:52][r...@greer]/$ aptitude show roundcube Package: roundcube New: yes

possible hack to postfix

hello all hello list I think there is a problem in the basic configuration of Postfix the basic configuration of Postfix is included in the rpm and sources I accessed the standard configuration file # Alternatively, you can specify the mynetworks list by hand, in # which case Postfix ignores

my problem is solved I'm not sending bounce

Hi URGENT my problem is solved I'm not sending bounce double_bounce_sender=no bounce_notice_recipient = postmaster sorry

startssl and CA autority

hi all hi postfix list I worked all day to develop my certificates with certificates free of startssl I based this document http://translate.google.fr/translate?js=yprev=_thl=frie=UTF-8u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.grandville.net%2FOpenSSL%2FLigneDeCommandesl=frtl=en I realized correctly signed

Re: startssl and CA autority

On Sun, 29 Nov 2009 03:00:46 +0100, fakessh fake...@fakessh.eu wrote: hi all hi postfix list I worked all day to develop my certificates with certificates free of startssl I based this document http://translate.google.fr/translate?js=yprev=_thl=frie=UTF-8u=http%3A%2F

how well set + anvil

hi all hi list how well set + anvil I would like to fine tune + anvil I wish there was not time to expectations identified in the original configuration of postfix. I would minimize the role of + anvil I often trade very fast mail that are slowed down by anvil thanks for all your nb : Buddha

Re: Postfix SMTP server: errors from 6.mail-out.ovh.net[91.121.25.210]

In: MAIL FROM:rps-return-25004-fakessh=fakessh...@ml.ovh.net Out: 250 2.1.0 Ok In: RCPT TO:fake...@fakessh.eu Out: 451 4.3.5 Server configuration error In: QUIT Out: 221 2.0.0 Bye

Re: Postfix SMTP server: errors from 6.mail-out.ovh.net[91.121.25.210]

In: MAIL FROM:rps-return-25008-fakessh=fakessh...@ml.ovh.net Out: 250 2.1.0 Ok In: RCPT TO:fake...@fakessh.eu Out: 451 4.3.5 Server configuration error In: QUIT Out: 221 2.0.0 Bye

Re: High volume Milter experiences?

may be used in http://milter-manager.sourceforge.net/ On Fri, 31 Jul 2009 21:59:47 +0200, Patrick Ben Koetter p...@state-of-mind.de wrote: Did anybody ever measure how many clients a Postfix server using Milter can serve? Somewhere hidden in my brain I recall someone on the list reporting

Re: Domain Key Issues

i use dkimproxy 1.1 , I dont use the beta release on my box On Fri, 24 Jul 2009 19:36:28 +0530 (IST), Zakir Shaikh searchza...@yahoo.co.in wrote: Thanks fakessh, Dkimproxy did the Magic! works gr8.. for both - Domain Keys DKIM. Thanks Regards, Zakir H. Shaikh

Re: Domain Key Issues

uses dkimproxy 1.1 work fine in my box On Wed, 22 Jul 2009 10:35:12 -0500, Noel Jones njo...@megan.vbhcs.org wrote: Zakir Shaikh wrote: Now, my problem is that when I send mails using webmail from the local user configured through vPostmaster then the mails are getting signed BUT the issue

Re: Postfix Toaster - replacing vpopmail

work fine on my box CentOS 5.3 http://pastebin.ca/1501508 On Mon, 20 Jul 2009 17:04:41 -0400, Charles Marcus cmar...@media-brokers.com wrote: On 7/20/2009, LuKreme (krem...@kreme.com) wrote: Before I bought my iTouch last year I thought I was going to hate the touch-screen keyboard, but the

Re: Postfix Toaster - replacing vpopmail

(MySQL+Postfix+Courier(+Amavisd-new)) and we are quite happy with it. Check it at http://www.ispconfig.org its lol ? ... trool On Sun, 19 Jul 2009 20:29:08 +0200, Ignacio Garcia i...@oenus.com wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 -Continued use of Courier-IMAP. Not so