i use dkimproxy 1.1 , I dont use the beta release on my box
On Fri, 24 Jul 2009 19:36:28 +0530 (IST), Zakir Shaikh <searchza...@yahoo.co.in> wrote: > Thanks fakessh, > > Dkimproxy did the Magic! > works gr8.. for both - Domain Keys & DKIM. > > > Thanks & Regards, > Zakir H. Shaikh > > > > > ________________________________ > From: fakessh <fake...@fakessh.eu> > To: Zakir Shaikh <searchza...@yahoo.co.in> > Cc: postfix mailing list <postfix-users@postfix.org>; > njo...@megan.vbhcs.org > Sent: Friday, 24 July, 2009 4:34:06 PM > Subject: Re: Domain Key Issues > > > uses dkimproxy 1.1 > > its work fine on my box > CentOS 5.3 > On Fri, 24 Jul 2009 16:16:54 +0530 (IST), Zakir Shaikh > <searchza...@yahoo.co.in> wrote: >>> This is a Domain Keys issue. See the -i option to dk-filter to add > which >> IPs should be signed. >> >>> And note that Domain Keys is less used these days. Consider dropping > it >> and using DKIM instead. >> >> >> Thanks for the suggestion. >> But it is Still Not Working. I tried with the " -i filename "option >> providing the list of IP-addresses that will sending/relaying the mails >> through the main server. >> The file entries have been properly fed with each IP on a different > line, >> as mentioned in the man page. >> >> I'm wondering, is there a 100 % solution for the Domain Keys & DKIM >> implementations ? >> >> >> Thanks & Regards, >> Zakir H. Shaikh >> >> >> >> Love Cricket? Check out live scores, photos, video highlights and >> more. Click here http://cricket.yahoo.com > > > > See the Web's breaking stories, chosen by people like you. Check > out Yahoo! Buzz. http://in.buzz.yahoo.com/
