Re: [PATCH] inet_interfaces = none

2011-04-05 Thread Ansgar Wiechers
On 2011-04-05 Christoph Moench-Tegeder wrote: > ## Wietse Venema (wie...@porcupine.org): >>> Well, postfix still doesn't relay mail to hosts with it's own host >>> name in the server greeting ("host ... greeted me with my own >>> hostname ..." and "host ... replied to HELO/EHLO with my own >>> host

Re: [PATCH] inet_interfaces = none

2011-04-05 Thread Pau Amma
On Tue, April 5, 2011 2:02 pm, Wietse Venema wrote: > I'm > not good at diplomacy. > > Wietse We know. We like you anyway. :-)

Re: [PATCH] inet_interfaces = none

2011-04-05 Thread Victor Duchovni
On Tue, Apr 05, 2011 at 03:49:28PM +0200, Christoph Moench-Tegeder wrote: > It would be a shame if we spend more time on the discussion of the > short-sightedness of my patch than I'd have to spend on fixing my > patch - just to have a better patch documented for those trapped with > broken setups

Re: [PATCH] inet_interfaces = none

2011-04-05 Thread Wietse Venema
Christoph Moench-Tegeder: > ## Wietse Venema (wie...@porcupine.org): > > > > Well, postfix still doesn't relay mail to hosts with it's own > > > host name in the server greeting ("host ... greeted me with my own > > > hostname ..." and "host ... replied to HELO/EHLO with my own hostname > > > ...

Re: [PATCH] inet_interfaces = none

2011-04-05 Thread Christoph Moench-Tegeder
## Wietse Venema (wie...@porcupine.org): > > Well, postfix still doesn't relay mail to hosts with it's own > > host name in the server greeting ("host ... greeted me with my own > > hostname ..." and "host ... replied to HELO/EHLO with my own hostname ..."), > > so it's not that easy to shoot one'

Re: [PATCH] inet_interfaces = none

2011-04-05 Thread Wietse Venema
Christoph Moench-Tegeder: > ## Wietse Venema (wie...@porcupine.org): > > > > for some admittedly special and braindead setup I needed to relay > > > outgoing mail via another MTA running on localhost:25. In order to > > > bypass some of the mail loop safety catches, I exteded inet_interfaces > > >

Re: [PATCH] inet_interfaces = none

2011-04-05 Thread Christoph Moench-Tegeder
## Wietse Venema (wie...@porcupine.org): > > for some admittedly special and braindead setup I needed to relay > > outgoing mail via another MTA running on localhost:25. In order to > > bypass some of the mail loop safety catches, I exteded inet_interfaces > > to accept "none". > > In case someone

Re: [PATCH] inet_interfaces = none

2011-04-05 Thread Wietse Venema
Christoph Moench-Tegeder: > Hi, > > for some admittedly special and braindead setup I needed to relay > outgoing mail via another MTA running on localhost:25. In order to > bypass some of the mail loop safety catches, I exteded inet_interfaces > to accept "none". > In case someone might find this

[PATCH] inet_interfaces = none

2011-04-05 Thread Christoph Moench-Tegeder
Hi, for some admittedly special and braindead setup I needed to relay outgoing mail via another MTA running on localhost:25. In order to bypass some of the mail loop safety catches, I exteded inet_interfaces to accept "none". In case someone might find this useful, I'll publish the path (against 2