On Sat, Apr 24, 2010 at 4:21 PM, Noel Jones wrote:
> Then read the developer's labeling.
I've read it, and it doesn't really change anything for me personally,
but everyone is entitled to their own opinion. Wietse may use them on
his production systems, but that still doesn't change the fact th
On 4/24/2010 3:06 PM, Jeff Mitchell wrote:
On Sat, Apr 24, 2010 at 12:20 AM, Victor Duchovni
wrote:
On Sat, Apr 24, 2010 at 12:01:05AM -0400, Jeff Mitchell wrote:
On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 6:44 PM, The Doctor wrote:
??Out: 220 doctor.nl2k.ab.ca ESMTP Postfix (2.8-20100323)
I know this (pro
On Sat, Apr 24, 2010 at 12:20 AM, Victor Duchovni
wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 24, 2010 at 12:01:05AM -0400, Jeff Mitchell wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 6:44 PM, The Doctor wrote:
>> >> > ??Out: 220 doctor.nl2k.ab.ca ESMTP Postfix (2.8-20100323)
>>
>> I know this (probably) has little bearing on th
On Sat, Apr 24, 2010 at 12:01:05AM -0400, Jeff Mitchell wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 6:44 PM, The Doctor wrote:
> >> > ??Out: 220 doctor.nl2k.ab.ca ESMTP Postfix (2.8-20100323)
>
> I know this (probably) has little bearing on the problem at hand, but
> if I used experimental snapshot release
On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 6:44 PM, The Doctor wrote:
>> > Out: 220 doctor.nl2k.ab.ca ESMTP Postfix (2.8-20100323)
I know this (probably) has little bearing on the problem at hand, but
if I used experimental snapshot releases in a customer-facing setting
I'd be booted out the door.
Likewise, if I
On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 03:02:30PM -0700, brian moore wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Apr 2010 15:38:06 -0600
> The Doctor wrote:
>
>
> > Out: 220 doctor.nl2k.ab.ca ESMTP Postfix (2.8-20100323)
> > In: mail-iw0-f172.google.com
> > Out: 402 4.5.2 Error: command not recognized
>
> is not a vali
On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 06:35:52PM -0400, Bill Cole wrote:
>> In: DATA
>> Out: 354 End data with.
>> Out: 451 4.3.0 Error: queue file write error
>
> http://www.postfix.org/SMTPD_PROXY_README.html explains one possible source
> of this: inability to connect to a before-queue proxy.
This i
On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 06:35:52PM -0400, Bill Cole wrote:
> The Doctor wrote, On 4/22/10 5:38 PM:
>> First off apologies for the rather sharp tone:
>>
>> A case of too many agngry customers breathing down the neck.
>>
>> Anyhow I have been since recover been getting many of these:
>>
>> - Forw
brian moore wrote, On 4/22/10 6:02 PM:
Google -does- usually use ESMTP, so it really looks like you have a
Pix running SMTP Fixup, which doesn't fix anything at all.
It can fix the problem of receiving too much mail. :)
It should be noted that the Cisco ASA also has this misfeature, and
repo
The Doctor wrote, On 4/22/10 5:38 PM:
First off apologies for the rather sharp tone:
A case of too many agngry customers breathing down the neck.
Anyhow I have been since recover been getting many of these:
- Forwarded message from Mail Delivery
System -
X-Spam-Checker-Version: Spam
On Thu, 22 Apr 2010 15:38:06 -0600
The Doctor wrote:
> Out: 220 doctor.nl2k.ab.ca ESMTP Postfix (2.8-20100323)
> In: mail-iw0-f172.google.com
> Out: 402 4.5.2 Error: command not recognized
is not a valid SMTP/ESMTP command.
Are you using a Pix?
> Out: 451 4.3.0 Error: queue fi
First off apologies for the rather sharp tone:
A case of too many agngry customers breathing down the neck.
Anyhow I have been since recover been getting many of these:
- Forwarded message from Mail Delivery System
-
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on doctor.nl
12 matches
Mail list logo
