On Sat, Apr 24, 2010 at 12:01:05AM -0400, Jeff Mitchell wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 6:44 PM, The Doctor <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
> >> > ??Out: 220 doctor.nl2k.ab.ca ESMTP Postfix (2.8-20100323)
>
> I know this (probably) has little bearing on the problem at hand, but
> if I used experimental snapshot releases in a customer-facing setting
> I'd be booted out the door.
Postfix 2.8 snapshots are reliable enough for production use. Their
feature-set is not future-proof, but if one needs (say postscreen)
a snapshot feature, it is not unreasonable to use a tested snapshot.
This has nothing to do with the OP's disinclination to read logs.
Once the OP believes us that reading logs is not a waste of time,
the problem will be solved.
> Likewise, if I was a customer and knew that my mail provider was using
> experimental snapshot releases of software, I'd switch providers.
That's your prerogative of course.
--
Viktor.
P.S. Morgan Stanley is looking for a New York City based, Senior Unix
system/email administrator to architect and sustain our perimeter email
environment. If you are interested, please drop me a note.
