-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Le 11.11.2010 22:10, Voytek Eymont a écrit :
>
> On Fri, November 12, 2010 6:16 am, Carlos Mennens wrote:
>> On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 2:07 PM, Victor Duchovni
>> wrote:
>
>> This would be no problem except I've never attempted this before and
>> just
On Fri, November 12, 2010 6:16 am, Carlos Mennens wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 2:07 PM, Victor Duchovni
> wrote:
> This would be no problem except I've never attempted this before and
> just did some searching on the web for tutorials I can follow since I don't
> have any experience and hone
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
mouss wrote:
|> anyone know that level of difficultly involved from turning SRPM's
|> into a RPM file I can use / distribute to others? I have the time and
|> dedication but lack the experience and knowledge.
|
|
|
| http://perso.b2b2c.ca/sarrazip/dev
Le 11/11/2010 20:16, Carlos Mennens a écrit :
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 2:07 PM, Victor Duchovni
wrote:
Simon also publishes SRPMs, so you can build an equivalent RPM on any
latest/greatest release of an O/S, for which Simon has not yet uploaded
a binary package. You really should always do that
On 11/11/2010 08:16 PM, Carlos Mennens wrote:
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 2:07 PM, Victor Duchovni
wrote:
Simon also publishes SRPMs, so you can build an equivalent RPM on any
latest/greatest release of an O/S, for which Simon has not yet uploaded
a binary package. You really should always do
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 2:07 PM, Victor Duchovni
wrote:
> Simon also publishes SRPMs, so you can build an equivalent RPM on any
> latest/greatest release of an O/S, for which Simon has not yet uploaded
> a binary package. You really should always do that, and not trust that
> some downloaded colle
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 01:46:06PM -0500, Carlos Mennens wrote:
> I know there's an un-official 2.7 Postfix RPM that I believe Simon
> created for RHEL 5 64-bit but does anyone know if there's a RHEL 6
> 64-bit version available or if the RHEL 5 version will install / work
> on RHEL 6?
Simon also
I know there's an un-official 2.7 Postfix RPM that I believe Simon
created for RHEL 5 64-bit but does anyone know if there's a RHEL 6
64-bit version available or if the RHEL 5 version will install / work
on RHEL 6?
For the archive, I had to change the postfix.spec slightly for it to
build on CentOS 5.4 x64, by setting with_sasl to 2
The sender_dependent_default_transport_maps feature works a treat,
thankyou Wietse.
Carl
Am 24.02.2010 14:04, schrieb Carl Brewer:
> Carlos Williams wrote:
>> Does anyone happen to know if anyone is kindly dedicating their time
>> to creating a Postfix 2.7 RPM for download? I know this is extremely
>> time consuming but I am really interested to try out Postfix 2.
Carlos Williams wrote:
Does anyone happen to know if anyone is kindly dedicating their time
to creating a Postfix 2.7 RPM for download? I know this is extremely
time consuming but I am really interested to try out Postfix 2.7 on my
CentOS x64 server. I realize Simon was responsible for creating
* ram [23/02/2010 09:01] :
>
> If someone can help me with a doc on creating a ".src.rpm" package I
> would like to try it
I've always found Guru Labs' guide to be helpful:
http://www.gurulabs.com/downloads/GURULABS-RPM-LAB/GURULABS-RPM-GUIDE-v1.0.PDF
Emmanuel
If someone can help me with a doc on creating a ".src.rpm" package I
would like to try it
Thanks
Ram
actually,when you're follow workaround on my site you got both binary
and source.
usually located at %_topdir/SRPMS/
spec files always produces both binary and source when rebuild with
On 23 February 2010 19:34, Eero Volotinen wrote:
> 2010/2/23 ram :
>> All the files which I used for my compile are here
>>
>> https://ecm.netcore.co.in/tmp/postfix-2.7.0.rpmfiles.tgz
>>
>> You may want to hash-off the dotname patch which I use on my machines
>>
>> Of course take care of the usual
2010/2/23 ram :
> On Mon, 2010-02-22 at 16:48 +0200, Eero Volotinen wrote:
>> 2010/2/22 ram :
>> > On Mon, 2010-02-22 at 09:17 -0500, Carlos Williams wrote:
>> >
>> > Does anyone happen to know if anyone is kindly dedicating their time
>> > to creatin
On Mon, 2010-02-22 at 16:48 +0200, Eero Volotinen wrote:
> 2010/2/22 ram :
> > On Mon, 2010-02-22 at 09:17 -0500, Carlos Williams wrote:
> >
> > Does anyone happen to know if anyone is kindly dedicating their time
> > to creating a Postfix 2.7 RPM for download? I know
2010/2/22 ram :
> On Mon, 2010-02-22 at 09:17 -0500, Carlos Williams wrote:
>
> Does anyone happen to know if anyone is kindly dedicating their time
> to creating a Postfix 2.7 RPM for download? I know this is extremely
> time consuming but I am really interested to try out Po
On Mon, 2010-02-22 at 09:17 -0500, Carlos Williams wrote:
> Does anyone happen to know if anyone is kindly dedicating their time
> to creating a Postfix 2.7 RPM for download? I know this is extremely
> time consuming but I am really interested to try out Postfix 2.7 on my
> CentOS x
Does anyone happen to know if anyone is kindly dedicating their time
to creating a Postfix 2.7 RPM for download? I know this is extremely
time consuming but I am really interested to try out Postfix 2.7 on my
CentOS x64 server. I realize Simon was responsible for creating the
previous RPM&#
19 matches
Mail list logo
