KLaM Postmaster a écrit :
> Noel Jones wrote:
>> Voytek Eymont wrote:
>>> On Sat, January 24, 2009 1:39 am, Noel Jones wrote:
>>>
reject_unknown_reverse_client_hostname reject_rbl_client
zen.spamhaus.org
{a greylisting policy service}
>>>
>>> Noel,
>>>
>>> is that a good place to add
Noel Jones wrote:
> Voytek Eymont wrote:
>> On Sat, January 24, 2009 1:39 am, Noel Jones wrote:
>>
>>> reject_unknown_reverse_client_hostname reject_rbl_client
>>> zen.spamhaus.org
>>> {a greylisting policy service}
>>
>>
>> Noel,
>>
>> is that a good place to add reject_unknown_reverse_client_host
Voytek Eymont wrote:
On Sat, January 24, 2009 1:39 am, Noel Jones wrote:
reject_unknown_reverse_client_hostname reject_rbl_client zen.spamhaus.org
{a greylisting policy service}
Noel,
is that a good place to add reject_unknown_reverse_client_hostname ?
smtpd_recipient_restrictions =
permi
On Sat, January 24, 2009 1:39 am, Noel Jones wrote:
> reject_unknown_reverse_client_hostname reject_rbl_client zen.spamhaus.org
> {a greylisting policy service}
Noel,
is that a good place to add reject_unknown_reverse_client_hostname ?
smtpd_recipient_restrictions =
permit_sasl_authenticated
> Is anyone using ClamAV with Postfix with the phishing filters?
> Are they effective?
>
> Does anyone know of any other service offering Phishing
> signatures that one can employ?
SaneSecurity (they're back) is providing ClamAV signatures for spam,
phishing, etc. Rsync scripts are available to d
Paul Reilly wrote:
Hello,
I know this is not specifically a postfix question, but I know there
are a lot of
very knowledgeable people on this list.
I'm wondering what success others have had blocking Phishing emails?
We can block them using header/body checks, but one is always playing
Hello,
I know this is not specifically a postfix question, but I know there
are a lot of
very knowledgeable people on this list.
I'm wondering what success others have had blocking Phishing emails?
We can block them using header/body checks, but one is always playing
catch up. It's
