I've been experimenting with relocated_maps as well as user-specific entries
in transport_maps. They work, but they also terminate the SMTP conversation
with the defined message. In my configuration the sender would never see
that message because the mail is received by the external spam filtering
Ville Walveranta wrote:
So I'm wondering if it would be possible to accept the mail, blackhole it,
and send a bounce-message to the sender with a User unknown message.
User-specific blackholing seems to be easy to implement, but how about the
user unknown bounce message? I'd like to be able to
Ville Walveranta wrote:
I've been experimenting with relocated_maps as well as user-specific entries
in transport_maps. They work, but they also terminate the SMTP conversation
with the defined message. In my configuration the sender would never see
that message because the mail is received
On Sat, Dec 13, 2008 at 10:24 AM, Sahil Tandon sa...@tandon.net wrote:
No, this is backscatter. Do not accept mail that you intend to bounce.
Relocated maps should be setup on the MX that sits on the border; not
an internal mail server.
Unfortunately I don't control the MX that initially
On 12/13/2008, Ville Walveranta (walvera...@gmail.com) wrote:
Unfortunately I don't control the MX that initially accepts the mails
(beyond accepting/rejecting an email for a specific address).
There are really very, very few situations where you should NOT reject
all mail destined for invalid
