Hi,
after upgrading a machine from etch to lenny i get the following warning
postfix/smtpd[23231]: warning: pcre map /etc/postfix/postfix_rbl_check, line 0:
ignoring unrecognized request
main.cf:
check_client_access pcre:/etc/postfix/postfix_rbl_check
file:
reject_rbl_client zen.spamhaus.or
On 1/19/2010 9:15 AM, Harakiri wrote:
Hi,
after upgrading a machine from etch to lenny i get the following warning
postfix/smtpd[23231]: warning: pcre map /etc/postfix/postfix_rbl_check, line 0:
ignoring unrecognized request
main.cf:
check_client_access pcre:/etc/postfix/postfix_rbl_check
f
Harakiri:
> Hi,
>
> after upgrading a machine from etch to lenny i get the following warning
>
> postfix/smtpd[23231]: warning: pcre map /etc/postfix/postfix_rbl_check, line
> 0: ignoring unrecognized request
>
> main.cf:
>
> check_client_access pcre:/etc/postfix/postfix_rbl_check
>
> file:
--- On Tue, 1/19/10, Wietse Venema wrote:
>
> That is not a valid PCRE file entry, and it has never been
> valid.
>
> Postfix promises compatibility only for behavior that is
> promised
> by documentation. Postfix behavior for invalid inputs is
> subject
> to change without prior warning.
ok
On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 07:57:02AM -0800, Harakiri wrote:
> --- On Tue, 1/19/10, Wietse Venema wrote:
> > > postfix/tlsmgr[23233]: warning: request to update
> > table btree:/var/spool/postfix/smtpd_scache in non-postfix
> > directory /var/spool/postfix
> >
> > See the RELEASE_NOTES file. Postfix
On 1/19/2010 9:57 AM, Harakiri wrote:
See the RELEASE_NOTES file. Postfix documentation is
created with
a great deal of effort. Don't let it go to waste.
I dont agree on this one (and this list is maybe not the right place for this)
- i expect the debian package maintainer to take care of any
--- On Tue, 1/19/10, Noel Jones wrote:
> From: Noel Jones
> Subject: Re: Changes in PCRE handling postfix etch vs lenny?
> To: postfix-users@postfix.org
> Date: Tuesday, January 19, 2010, 11:42 AM
> On 1/19/2010 9:57 AM, Harakiri
> wrote:
> >> See the RELEASE_NOTES
On 1/19/2010 10:51 AM, Harakiri wrote:
--- On Tue, 1/19/10, Noel Jones wrote:
From: Noel Jones
Subject: Re: Changes in PCRE handling postfix etch vs lenny?
To: postfix-users@postfix.org
Date: Tuesday, January 19, 2010, 11:42 AM
On 1/19/2010 9:57 AM, Harakiri
wrote:
See the RELEASE_NOTES
Well, there's one positive side to this thread Noel. Your reply to "undisclosed
recipients" instead of the list address broke my postfix-users sort filter. I
just spent 20 minutes trying to figure it out. I tried "received" and
"return-path" and all kinds of header checks in the T-Bird message
On Tue, 19 Jan 2010 17:15:59 -0600
Stan Hoeppner wrote:
>
> Well, there's one positive side to this thread Noel. Your reply to
> "undisclosed
> recipients" instead of the list address broke my postfix-users sort filter. I
> just spent 20 minutes trying to figure it out. I tried "received" an
/dev/rob0 put forth on 1/19/2010 10:41 AM:
>> I have to manually install postfix-doc to find a
>> /usr/share/doc/postfix/RELEASE_NOTES.gz file.
>
> This is worth complaining about, IMO. If a user should make the
> conscious decision to not install the documentation with a given
> package, that's
Stan Hoeppner a écrit :
> Well, there's one positive side to this thread Noel. Your reply to
> "undisclosed
> recipients" instead of the list address broke my postfix-users sort filter. I
> just spent 20 minutes trying to figure it out. I tried "received" and
> "return-path" and all kinds of he
mouss put forth on 1/20/2010 2:26 PM:
>> That's just plain silly.
>
> Keep calm Stan!
I was calm. I had no exclamation point there. ;)
> Consider this to be a good lesson: your filtering approach is
> suboptimal. For most mailing lists, you can use one of:
It _was_ less than optimal.
> List-
On 2010-01-19, Stan Hoeppner (s...@hardwarefreak.com) wrote:
> So now I get to file a bug report on T-Bird as it's clearly not processing the
> headers correctly or obeying "custom" headers I plug in. Hell, it won't even
> filter on Sender: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org for Pete's sake and Sende
Charles Marcus put forth on 1/21/2010 6:05 AM:
> On 2010-01-19, Stan Hoeppner (s...@hardwarefreak.com) wrote:
>> So now I get to file a bug report on T-Bird as it's clearly not processing
>> the
>> headers correctly or obeying "custom" headers I plug in. Hell, it won't even
>> filter on Sender: o
On 2010-01-21 8:23 PM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> Thanks for the heads up. Yes, I'm using IMAP and TB3. So I'm sure
> this is the same bug. Interestingly, like I said, the filter on
> Sender works fine for newly arriving messages. It just doesn't work
> on messages already in the inbox when running
On 2010-01-22 5:36 PM, Charles Marcus wrote:
> Here's the bug:
Sorry, meant to send that direct to Stan...
17 matches
Mail list logo
