Stan Hoeppner a écrit : > Well, there's one positive side to this thread Noel. Your reply to > "undisclosed > recipients" instead of the list address broke my postfix-users sort filter. I > just spent 20 minutes trying to figure it out. I tried "received" and > "return-path" and all kinds of header checks in the T-Bird message filter, and > none of them work on this message. They clearly should. > > So now I get to file a bug report on T-Bird as it's clearly not processing the > headers correctly or obeying "custom" headers I plug in. Hell, it won't even > filter on Sender: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org for Pete's sake and Sender > is > built into the filter, not custom, IIRC. >
There's no bug to field. postfix-users mail contains: Sender: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org Precedence: bulk List-Post: <mailto:postfix-users@postfix.org> List-Help: <http://www.postfix.org/lists.html> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majord...@postfix.org> List-Subscribe: <mailto:majord...@postfix.org> so you can use List-Post or Sender (it is unfortunate that there is no List-Id header...). so on T-Bird, when you create a filter, in the "header" field, select the last value to add a new header. add "List-Post". Use this to add other headers (List-Id, Sender, X-Spam-Status, ... whatever). then you can filter based on the newly added header. > Regardless of the T-Bird issue, could we all please reply to the list address > instead of burying it in a BCC? You're using the wrong tool. From:, To:, Cc: ... are not the right headers to identify list mail. If you check my replies, most of the time, you won't see a "To" header, but a Cc only. This is because I manually remove the To (which is the original From:) unless I want to Cc the original sender. This is because TB doesn't have a "reply to list" button (well, not in the "packaged" version I use...). > That's just plain silly. Keep calm Stan! Consider this to be a good lesson: your filtering approach is suboptimal. For most mailing lists, you can use one of: List-Id List-Post Sender except maybe for some exceptions (but then suggest to the list admins to implement the List-Id header).
