Thank you everyone that pointed out the use of the recipient_delimiter
parameter. It took several of you pounding on my thick skull to
penetrate it, but I finally looked at the parameter.
This is embarrassing:
I have *never* looked at that parameter -- and when the first person
mentioned it I th
Charles Boling a écrit :
>> with SQL, there is no need to use pcre. just do that in the SQL query to
>> avoid having to keep an external file up to date...
>
> ...except that the "+" (and everything between it and the "@") is *not*
> actually part of the email address.
of course the "+" is part
On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 09:12:00AM -0800, Charles Boling wrote:
mouss:
> > with SQL, there is no need to use pcre. just do that in the SQL
> > query to avoid having to keep an external file up to date...
>
> ...except that the "+" (and everything between it and the "@") is
> *not* actually part
> with SQL, there is no need to use pcre. just do that in the SQL query to
> avoid having to keep an external file up to date...
...except that the "+" (and everything between it and the "@") is *not*
actually part of the email address. To use your address as an example:
When Postfix receives an
LuKreme a écrit :
> On 16-Jan-2010, at 12:24, Wietse Venema wrote:
>>> To address that issue, I would like to be able to use another character
>>> ("_" or ".") that is commonly accepted as part of email addresses, instead.
>> Address transformation mappings are always queried at recipient
>> valida
On 16-Jan-2010, at 12:24, Wietse Venema wrote:
>> To address that issue, I would like to be able to use another character
>> ("_" or ".") that is commonly accepted as part of email addresses, instead.
>
> Address transformation mappings are always queried at recipient
> validation time, so you can
Charles Boling:
> I've been a postfix user for nearly 10 years, but in many ways I'm still
> quite the newbie. That's the problem with Postfix being such a solid
> MTA: I don't mess with it much. :-)
>
> For a good chunk of that time, I have wrestled on and off with this
> problem off and on, pla
On Sat, Jan 16, 2010 at 11:06 AM, Charles Boling
wrote:
> I've been a postfix user for nearly 10 years, but in many ways I'm still
> quite the newbie. That's the problem with Postfix being such a solid
> MTA: I don't mess with it much. :-)
>
> For a good chunk of that time, I have wrestled on and
I've been a postfix user for nearly 10 years, but in many ways I'm still
quite the newbie. That's the problem with Postfix being such a solid
MTA: I don't mess with it much. :-)
For a good chunk of that time, I have wrestled on and off with this
problem off and on, playing with it for a bit, givi
