On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 4:53 PM, Charles Marcus
[EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
On 11/11/2008 4:49 PM, Charles Marcus wrote:
Common administrative practices include submission on 587 for
trusted clients only and should not be permitted on the internet.
This port should be firewalled outside of
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 12:44 PM, mouss [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Linux Addict wrote:
On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 4:53 PM, Charles Marcus
[EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
On 11/11/2008 4:49 PM, Charles Marcus wrote:
Common administrative practices include submission on 587 for
trusted clients only
On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 5:19 PM, Noel Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Linux Addict wrote:
Hi, Please excuse me if it is not relevant on this forum.
I am planning to use domain keys and dkim for our domain just to send
mails outside.
Is DKIMproxy good enough to cover both older Yahoo
Linux Addict wrote:
While I read through this, I understand that to use domain keys, the
client has to send mails through submission port 587. Does that sound
right? Just to use domainkeys, all clients to has to send mails to
port 587 instead of port 25? Please clarify. Thank you
The
On 11/11/2008 4:35 PM, Brian Evans - Postfix List wrote:
Linux Addict wrote:
While I read through this, I understand that to use domain keys, the
client has to send mails through submission port 587. Does that sound
right? Just to use domainkeys, all clients to has to send mails to
port 587
On 11/11/2008 4:49 PM, Charles Marcus wrote:
Common administrative practices include submission on 587 for
trusted clients only and should not be permitted on the internet.
This port should be firewalled outside of your network.
Excuse me?!?!? Thats ridiculous... in fact, just the OPPOSITE
Hi, Please excuse me if it is not relevant on this forum.
I am planning to use domain keys and dkim for our domain just to send mails
outside.
Is DKIMproxy good enough to cover both older Yahoo Domainkeys and new DKIM?
thanks you.
~LA
