In looking for methods to install DKIM with postfix I am running into
some old info and some new info. It looks like the best way to handle
DKIM is using the plugin feature of postfix and use the sendmail
milters.
The other question is what do most people do with the check on the
DKIM
LuKreme a écrit :
In looking for methods to install DKIM with postfix I am running into
some old info and some new info. It looks like the best way to handle
DKIM is using the plugin feature of postfix and use the sendmail milters.
if you use amavisd-new, then it supports DKIM (assuming you
On Mon, Dec 08, 2008 at 02:01:05AM +0100, mouss wrote:
The other question is what do most people do with the check on the DKIM
if a message fails, reject outright? Won't this mess up any forwarded
mail?
I wouldn't reject. I actually leave verification to spamassassin.
It would sure
On 7-Dec-2008, at 18:50, Victor Duchovni wrote:
Do NOT use DKIM to reject unsigned mail or mail with a broken
signature.
If you don't intend to whitelist any DKIM senders, don't both
validating
DKIM signatuers, there is little point in doing so.
My main intent is to try to flag mails
On Sun, Dec 07, 2008 at 08:14:17PM -0700, LuKreme wrote:
My main intent is to try to flag mails claiming to be from paypal that
aren't, so I think maybe just DKIM support in SpamAssassin is the way
to go.
http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/postfix/2007-11/0495.html
--
LuKreme wrote:
[...]
The other question is what do most people do with the check on the DKIM
if a message fails, reject outright? Won't this mess up any forwarded
mail?
Because of DKIM and related specifications are in a time of transition
stage, it is not good to reject directly if a
