On 13 Oct 2011, at 13:29, Tolga wrote:
>
>
> On 10/13/2011 03:24 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>>
>> Am 13.10.2011 14:18, schrieb Tolga:
>>
>> On 10/13/2011 03:09 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>>> is this your first mailserver?
>> No, it's not my first mailserver, but I have lost my previous configurat
On 10/13/2011 03:24 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 13.10.2011 14:18, schrieb Tolga:
On 10/13/2011 03:09 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
is this your first mailserver?
No, it's not my first mailserver, but I have lost my previous configuration
the question "if i need both" cares me a little bit beca
Am 13.10.2011 14:18, schrieb Tolga:
On 10/13/2011 03:09 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
> is this your first mailserver?
No, it's not my first mailserver, but I have lost my previous configuration
> the question "if i need both" cares me a little bit because logically a
> foreign
> mailserver has a M
On 10/13/2011 03:09 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 13.10.2011 14:04, schrieb Tolga:
Yes, it's a client connection. So, bottom line is, I need both 25 *and* 587 if
this is an MX.
If yes, I'm trying for days for nothing.
is this your first mailserver?
No, it's not my first mailserver, but I ha
Am 13.10.2011 14:04, schrieb Tolga:
> Yes, it's a client connection. So, bottom line is, I need both 25 *and* 587
> if this is an MX.
> If yes, I'm trying for days for nothing.
is this your first mailserver?
587 is for ATHENTICATED smtp-submission and should be active because more and
more I
On 10/13/2011 02:49 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 13.10.2011 13:43, schrieb Tolga:
submission inet n - n - - smtpd
# -o smtpd_tls_security_level=encrypt
# -o smtpd_sasl_auth_enable=yes
# -o smtpd_client_restrictions=permit_sasl_authenticated,reject
# -o milter_
Am 13.10.2011 13:43, schrieb Tolga:
>>> submission inet n - n - - smtpd
>>> # -o smtpd_tls_security_level=encrypt
>>> # -o smtpd_sasl_auth_enable=yes
>>> # -o smtpd_client_restrictions=permit_sasl_authenticated,reject
>>> # -o milter_macro_daemon_name=ORIGINATING
On 10/12/2011 05:35 PM, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 09:13:45AM +0300, Tolga wrote:
Below are my postconf -n and master.cf:
root@vps:~# postconf -n
debug_peer_level = 3
debug_peer_list = localhost
Don't.
What should I do? Remove these?
myhostname = vps.ozses.net
No such
On 2011-10-12 10:19 AM, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 07:44:34AM -0400, Charles Marcus wrote:
I'm far from expert at this stuff, but I'm fairly certain you can't
mix/match... either run everything chrooted, or don't.
Not true, in fact, some services should never be chrooted,
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 09:13:45AM +0300, Tolga wrote:
> Below are my postconf -n and master.cf:
>
> root@vps:~# postconf -n
> debug_peer_level = 3
> debug_peer_list = localhost
Don't.
> myhostname = vps.ozses.net
No such host in the public DNS.
> mynetworks = 127.0.0.0/8 127.0.0.2/32 184.82.
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 07:44:34AM -0400, Charles Marcus wrote:
> On 2011-10-12 2:13 AM, Tolga wrote:
> >pickupfifo n - - 60 1 pickup
> >cleanup unix n - - - 0 cleanup
>
> You still have lots of stuff chrooted...
>
> I'm far fro
On 2011-10-12 2:13 AM, Tolga wrote:
pickupfifo n - - 60 1 pickup
cleanup unix n - - - 0 cleanup
You still have lots of stuff chrooted...
I'm far from expert at this stuff, but I'm fairly certain you can't
mix/match... either
Hi,
Below are my postconf -n and master.cf:
root@vps:~# postconf -n
alias_database = hash:/etc/aliases
alias_maps = hash:/etc/aliases
append_dot_mydomain = no
biff = no
broken_sasl_auth_clients = yes
config_directory = /etc/postfix
debug_peer_level = 3
debug_peer_list = localhost
html_directory
On 2011-10-11 09:11, Tolga wrote:
On 10/11/2011 08:58 AM, Tolga wrote:
On 10/10/2011 11:41 PM, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 2011-10-10 4:17 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
Tolga:
On 10-10-2011 21:09, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 2011-10-10 2:56 AM, Tolga wrote:
I was reported that the e-mails people se
On 10/11/2011 08:58 AM, Tolga wrote:
On 10/10/2011 11:41 PM, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 2011-10-10 4:17 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
Tolga:
On 10-10-2011 21:09, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 2011-10-10 2:56 AM, Tolga wrote:
I was reported that the e-mails people send never get to my
server. When
I
On 10/10/2011 11:41 PM, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 2011-10-10 4:17 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
Tolga:
On 10-10-2011 21:09, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 2011-10-10 2:56 AM, Tolga wrote:
I was reported that the e-mails people send never get to my
server. When
I first was reported, I tested and it wa
On 2011-10-10 4:17 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
Tolga:
On 10-10-2011 21:09, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 2011-10-10 2:56 AM, Tolga wrote:
I was reported that the e-mails people send never get to my server. When
I first was reported, I tested and it was true. I tested some more and
found out I couldn
Tolga:
> On 10-10-2011 21:09, Charles Marcus wrote:
> > On 2011-10-10 2:56 AM, Tolga wrote:
> >> I was reported that the e-mails people send never get to my server. When
> >> I first was reported, I tested and it was true. I tested some more and
> >> found out I couldn't get e-mail when I switch t
On 10-10-2011 21:09, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 2011-10-10 2:56 AM, Tolga wrote:
I was reported that the e-mails people send never get to my server. When
I first was reported, I tested and it was true. I tested some more and
found out I couldn't get e-mail when I switch to submission port. How
ca
On 2011-10-10 2:56 AM, Tolga wrote:
I was reported that the e-mails people send never get to my server. When
I first was reported, I tested and it was true. I tested some more and
found out I couldn't get e-mail when I switch to submission port. How
can I fix this? You can find my postconf -n an
On 10/10/2011 1:56 AM, Tolga wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was reported that the e-mails people send never get to my server.
> When I first was reported, I tested and it was true. I tested some
> more and found out I couldn't get e-mail when I switch to submission
> port. How can I fix this? You can find my
On 10/10/2011 01:27 PM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
On 10/10/2011 4:56 AM, Tolga wrote:
Sorry, I have absolutely no log for that entry. And no, there is no
firewall.
Can you ping your Postfix host by name and IP address from the remote host?
Yes.
On 10/10/2011 4:56 AM, Tolga wrote:
> Sorry, I have absolutely no log for that entry. And no, there is no
> firewall.
Can you ping your Postfix host by name and IP address from the remote host?
--
Stan
Sorry, I have absolutely no log for that entry. And no, there is no
firewall.
On 10/10/2011 12:41 PM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
On 10/10/2011 4:18 AM, postfix wrote:
Firewall sitting on submission port?
Log entries of the transactions would be very helpful. The list welcome
msg instructed you to
On 10/10/2011 4:18 AM, postfix wrote:
> Firewall sitting on submission port?
Log entries of the transactions would be very helpful. The list welcome
msg instructed you to include log entries. If there are no
corresponding log entries for the attempted connections that info would
be helpful as w
Firewall sitting on submission port?
suomi
On 2011-10-10 08:56, Tolga wrote:
Hi,
I was reported that the e-mails people send never get to my server. When
I first was reported, I tested and it was true. I tested some more and
found out I couldn't get e-mail when I switch to submission port. How
Hi,
I was reported that the e-mails people send never get to my server. When
I first was reported, I tested and it was true. I tested some more and
found out I couldn't get e-mail when I switch to submission port. How
can I fix this? You can find my postconf -n and master.cf below (at the
mom
27 matches
Mail list logo
