On 2010-09-10 5:50 AM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> Indexes can speed up IMAP performance a decent amount, but they don't
> help POP performance at all.
Dovecots indexes speed up IMAP performance quite dramatically in most
cases, not just a 'decent amount', at least as compared to Courier -
well, lets
On 2010-09-22 6:03 PM, Nick Edwards wrote:
> By the way, I need to thank you, given your discussion with Timo was one
> that had set alarm bells off on this, and the thread with Eddie
> confirmed the risks, can't understand Timo's attitude towards it, but as
> he said maybe dovecot is not for anyon
On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 12:36 AM, Charles Marcus
wrote:
> On 2010-09-10 5:50 AM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> > Indexes can speed up IMAP performance a decent amount, but they don't
> > help POP performance at all.
>
>
> As far as I know, Courier's speed issues are mostly IMAP related, so if
> you're o
On 2010-09-10 8:35 PM, Nick Edwards wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 12:36 AM, Charles Marcus
> mailto:cmar...@media-brokers.com>> wrote:
>>> Please note, we are silent lurkers, we know some of you are on both
>>> lists, and aware of the threads I speak of, so are not interested in
>>> your POV in
I have no idea how gmail allowed this post, since I labelled you as a
spammer (you're an outright troll, but sadly gmail has no function for
trolls, only spammers) after your first post to me.
But you are the one full of it, anyone is free to read the archives of
dovecot to see it affects pop3 DUE
Zitat von Nick Edwards :
I have no idea how gmail allowed this post, since I labelled you as a
spammer (you're an outright troll, but sadly gmail has no function for
trolls, only spammers) after your first post to me.
But you are the one full of it, anyone is free to read the archives of
doveco
