Sure, I must suck at expressing myself as well. Not only had it been
left intact and moved into the conditional construct, it had still been
there without that in addition, thereby defeating the very purpose of
patching. Like I said, contrary to what I might seem, I'm no moron and
I've realized the
Tam?s G?rczei:
> Indeed, I should have had some rest before applying your patch... I did
> create the condition, branching on init mode towards continue as
> intended, yet also left the original call there right thereafter :D It
You MUST KEEP the original panic call, like this:
if ((proc
Indeed, I should have had some rest before applying your patch... I did
create the condition, branching on init mode towards continue as
intended, yet also left the original call there right thereafter :D It
applied and compiled well and I was sure I used the new packages and
image so I was relucta
Tam?s G?rczei:
> 1 root 0:00 /usr/libexec/postfix/master -i
>...
> 78 postfix 0:00 smtpd -n smtp -t inet -u -o stress=
>
> Feb 18 09:36:57 mail-postfix-0 postfix/master[1]: panic: master_reap:
> unknown pid: 78*
> > + if (init_mode)
> > + continue; /
So I've now configured init mode in foreground with logging properly on
stdout and your patch applied to the last 3.5 snapshot and I got the
same panic, although this time not against my piped spamd process,
rather smtpd, it would appear:
/ # ps
PID USER TIME COMMAND
1 root 0:00 /u
Tam?s G?rczei:
> Thanks Wietse, I'll definitely try this patch -? but this code didn't
> change in quite a bit of time.
If in doubt, look RTFM the Postfix 3.3.1 announcement.
* Postfix did not support running as a PID=1 process, which
complicated Postfix management in containers. The "postf
Hm.. Thanks to You both, I'll go take a look at this.
On 2019. 02. 17. 16:14, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Tam?s G?rczei:
>> Thanks Wietse, I'll definitely try this patch -? but this code didn't
>> change in quite a bit of time.
> If in doubt, look RTFM the Postfix 3.3.1 announcement.
>
> * Postfix di
Am 17.02.19 um 16:01 schrieb Tamás Gérczei:
> Anyway I'm invoking postfix-script in order to start master:
I wonder why you don't use "postfix start-fg" available since postfix-3.3.1
(http://www.postfix.org/announcements/postfix-3.3.1.html)
Andreas
Thanks Wietse, I'll definitely try this patch - but this code didn't
change in quite a bit of time. Can this behaviour I'm seeing somehow
relate to a change introduced between 3.3.0 and 3.3.2 ? I have zero
problems with the exact same setup and configuration on 3.3.0. Anyway
I'm invoking postfix-s
Wietse Venema:
> Tam?s G?rczei:
> > Hello List,
> >
> > I'd like to ask whether You're aware of any change which might cause
> > breakage in my setup involving spamc with a completely unchanged
> > configuration in between - I'm getting the following error:
> >
> > *"panic: master_reap: unknown p
10 matches
Mail list logo
