On 14 Apr 2020, at 11:42, Rick King wrote:
> We were thinking using a header_check rule, something like this; but didn't
> work due to the "backtracking limit exceeded" warning.
The From: header is entirely valid, and the issue is the user’s MUA is not
showing the full header (in an effort to
On 14/04/2020 18:42, Rick King wrote:
We have a customer that occasionally receives messages like this...
Return-Path:
From: "Free iPad "
To:
Subject:Free iPad
Any suggestions welcome! Thank you!
On 15.04.20 11:09, Allen Coates wrote:
I am no expert on pattern matching, but could you
On 14/04/2020 18:42, Rick King wrote:
> Hello List!
>
> We have a customer that occasionally receives messages like this...
>
> Return-Path:
> From: "Free iPad "
> To:
> Subject:Free iPad
> Any suggestions welcome! Thank you!
>
>
I am no expert on pattern matching, but could you
On Tue, 14 Apr 2020 at 18:45, Rick King wrote:
>
> Postfix version 3.1.1
>
> Hello List!
>
> We have a customer that occasionally receives messages like this...
>
> Return-Path:
> From: "Free iPad "
> To:
> Subject:Free iPad
>
> From the looks of it, messages like these are from legit domains
Postfix version 3.1.1
Hello List!
We have a customer that occasionally receives messages like this...
Return-Path:
From: "Free iPad "
To:
Subject:Free iPad
>From the looks of it, messages like these are from legit domains with a
>carefully crafted "displayName".
So the "displayName" is
