Manager:
> Spam and Virus Prevention
> Mass Mailing
> G Suite/Gmail
>
> ang...@uconn.edu
> University of Connecticut, ITS, SSG, Server Systems
> 860-486-9075
>
> -Original Message-
> From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org On
> Behalf Of Viktor Dukhovni
&g
Dukhovni
Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2018 12:10 PM
To: Postfix users
Subject: Re: Not sure if i have a DNS or Postfix issue ?
> On Sep 20, 2018, at 11:37 AM, Fazzina, Angelo
> wrote:
>
> User sends email to ling...@listserv.uconn.edu.
> [two of recipients are woodsan...
> On Sep 20, 2018, at 11:37 AM, Fazzina, Angelo
> wrote:
>
> User sends email to ling...@listserv.uconn.edu.
> [two of recipients are woodsan...@msn.com and jb...@albanylaw.edu]
>
> Listserv.uconn.edu relays the email to smtp.uconn.edu
> When smtp.uconn.edu resolves to MTA4 and not MTA1-3 w
Hi, not sure if i am looking in the wrong place:
If you want my postconf I can get it.
User sends email to ling...@listserv.uconn.edu with client. [one of recipients
is woodsan...@msn.com and jb...@albanylaw.edu]
MX for listserv.uconn.edu is spam boxes.
Email goes to spam boxes, and spam boxes r
Hi,
Thanks, that has done it.
Thanks.
Dave.
On 8/4/18, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
>
>
>> On Aug 4, 2018, at 11:15 AM, David Mehler wrote:
>>
>> Sorry, the parameter is smtpd_tls_eecdh_grade it was set to ultra I
>> set it to strong. I don't know if that's what did it but clients can
>> now send.
> On Aug 4, 2018, at 11:15 AM, David Mehler wrote:
>
> Sorry, the parameter is smtpd_tls_eecdh_grade it was set to ultra I
> set it to strong. I don't know if that's what did it but clients can
> now send.
With recent Postfix releases, and OpenSSL >= 1.0.2, the best setting
for this parameter
Hi,
Sorry, the parameter is smtpd_tls_eecdh_grade it was set to ultra I
set it to strong. I don't know if that's what did it but clients can
now send.
If I'm getting what I'm reading ultra refers to p-384 bit ecc curves,
while strong is p-256, that's what I've got.
Thanks.
Dave.
On 8/4/18, Wie
David Mehler:
> Hello,
>
> Thanks Wietse and Victor,
>
> I commented out the smtp* lines and didn't fix it. What I then did was
> changed my ecc_grade from ultra to strong. Does this sound like the
> solution?
$ postconf|grep ecc_grade
[empty output]
Hello,
Thanks Wietse and Victor,
I commented out the smtp* lines and didn't fix it. What I then did was
changed my ecc_grade from ultra to strong. Does this sound like the
solution?
Thanks.
Dave.
On 8/3/18, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
>
>
>> On Aug 3, 2018, at 6:09 PM, David Mehler wrote:
>>
>> s
> On Aug 3, 2018, at 6:09 PM, David Mehler wrote:
>
> smtpd_tls_mandatory_protocols = !SSLv2, !SSLv3, !TLSv1 !TLSv1.1 TLSv1.2
> smtpd_tls_protocols = !SSLv2, !SSLv3, !TLSv1 !TLSv1.1 TLSv1.2
This does not leave too many working options... :-)
--
Viktor.
David Mehler:
> Aug 3 17:22:27 hostname postfix/submission/smtpd[65716]: warning: TLS
> library problem: error:1408A0C1:SSL routines:ssl3_get_client_hello:no
> shared cipher:s3_srvr.c:1427:
...
> smtp_tls_mandatory_exclude_ciphers = aNULL, eNULL, EXPORT, DES, RC4,
> MD5, PSK, aECDH, EDH-DSS-DES-CB
Hello,
I'm using Postfix 3.3. I am atempting to send mail from a remote
android phone running AquaMail Pro, which does support ECC
certificates of secp-256. So I got an ecc cert pair from letsencrypt
and installed it. Atempting to send an email gives me a handshake
error on the android client and
Hi again, thanks for the pointers everyone.
It was not a Postfix issue. I have no idea how it happened but permissions on /
got changed some how.
This fixed the default Postfix install, and then I put my config in and we are
running normally again.
root@mail2 ~]# ls -ld /
drw---. 23
On 2012-07-23 Marius Lewies wrote:
> Referring to Ansgar reply it seems that relay_domains.db is out of
> date. Ansgar suggested " You need to run the command to convert the
> (plain text) map into the database file that Postfix uses" How to do
> or else, where can I find the instruction to do
day, July 23, 2012 4:15 PM
> To: Marius Lewies; Ansgar Wiechers; postfix-users@postfix.org
> Subject: RE: Postfix Issue
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Marius Lewies [mailto:mariu...@verpakt.com]
>> Sent: 23 July 2012 15:03
>> To: James Day; Ansgar Wi
-Original Message-
From: James Day [mailto:james@ontraq.com]
Sent: Monday, July 23, 2012 4:15 PM
To: Marius Lewies; Ansgar Wiechers; postfix-users@postfix.org
Subject: RE: Postfix Issue
> -Original Message-
> From: Marius Lewies [mailto:mariu...@verpakt.com]
> Sent
> -Original Message-
> From: Marius Lewies [mailto:mariu...@verpakt.com]
> Sent: 23 July 2012 15:03
> To: James Day; Ansgar Wiechers; postfix-users@postfix.org
> Subject: RE: Postfix Issue
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: James Day [mailto:james.
Am 23.07.2012 16:03, schrieb Marius Lewies:
please strip qutoings a little bit!
> Referring to Ansgar reply it seems that relay_domains.db is out of
> date. Ansgar suggested " You need to run the command to convert the
> (plain text) map into the database file that Postfix uses" How to do or
-Original Message-
From: James Day [mailto:james@ontraq.com]
Sent: Monday, July 23, 2012 3:45 PM
To: Marius Lewies; Ansgar Wiechers; postfix-users@postfix.org
Subject: RE: Postfix Issue
> -Original Message-
> From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [mailto:owner-p
> -Original Message-
> From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [mailto:owner-postfix-
> us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of Marius Lewies
> Sent: 23 July 2012 14:32
> To: Ansgar Wiechers; postfix-users@postfix.org
> Subject: RE: Postfix Issue
>
> Nor did I think I am.
Message-
From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org
[mailto:owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of Ansgar Wiechers
Sent: Monday, July 23, 2012 2:39 PM
To: postfix-users@postfix.org
Subject: Re: Postfix Issue
Please keep this on-list. You're neither family, nor personal friend,
nor p
Please keep this on-list. You're neither family, nor personal friend,
nor paying customer, so you're not entitled to personal support.
On 2012-07-23 Marius Lewies wrote:
> Did you postmap all_ad_recipients after adding the recipient address?
> = Yes did run a ./getadusers and verified that address
On Mon, 23 Jul 2012 12:19:18 +0200
Marius Lewies articulated:
> I am new to Postfix and have taken over the admin thereof.
>
> We have a situation where a certain email address get the following
> error. All other mail gets relayed.
> SMTP error from remote mail server after RCPT
> TO:: host
On 2012-07-23 Marius Lewies wrote:
> We have a situation where a certain email address get the following
> error. All other mail gets relayed.
>
> SMTP error from remote mail server after RCPT
> TO::
> host maila.vegaspartnerlounge.dk [196.14.16.67]:
> 554 5.7.1 : Relay access denied
>
> Below
I have gone thorugh that actualy my scenario is that we have a server
through which mails are sent by a PHP script to a server which has
postfix as an MTA this postfix server then forwards mails to the
network i.e to their destinations.
In this scenario how can i achieve my goal with a VERP- encode
Achal tomar:
>
> This is header of mail that i have received from mailchimp:
>
> Return-Path:
> bounce-mc.us2_6034522.1358370-achal.tomar58=gmail@mail76.us2.mcsv.net>
That is a VERP-encoded sender address.
This combines the sender
bounce-mc.us2_6034522.1358...@mail76.us2.mcsv.net
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 2:30 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
> PLEASE reply to the list and not private!
>
> Am 12.06.2012 10:56, schrieb achal tomar:
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 1:40 PM, Reindl Harald
> > h.rei...@thelounge.net>> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > Am 12.06.2012 09:26, schrieb Achal to
Am 12.06.2012 09:26, schrieb Achal tomar:
>
> This is header of mail that i have received from mailchimp:
>
> Return-Path:
> bounce-mc.us2_6034522.1358370-achal.tomar58=gmail@mail76.us2.mcsv.net>
> Received: from mail76.us2.mcsv.net (mail76.us2.mcsv.net. [173.231.139.76])
> by mx.go
elp may be i am missing something. My mail server has
postfix as an MTA and i have centOS 5 as an OS.
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/return-address-header-postfix-issue.-tp33998114p33998114.html
Sent from the Postfix mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
On Sun, Jun 10, 2012 at 4:32 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> achal tomar:
> > ~/.forward+listname:
> > "|/some/where/command ..."
> >
> > I am no able to understand what is the meaning of that is what to write
> in it:-
> >"|/some/where/command ..."
>
> VERP_README says:
>
>You need to set
achal tomar:
> ~/.forward+listname:
> "|/some/where/command ..."
>
> I am no able to understand what is the meaning of that is what to write in
> it:-
>"|/some/where/command ..."
VERP_README says:
You need to set up a file named .forward+listname with the
commands that process a
On Sat, Jun 9, 2012 at 5:18 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Achal tomar:
> > mail. I have tried http://www.postfix.org/VERP_README.html but i am not
> able
> > to implement it properly can anyone tell me how to do this in some easy
> > steps.
>
> If you can show what you did, then someone can point ou
Achal tomar:
> mail. I have tried http://www.postfix.org/VERP_README.html but i am not able
> to implement it properly can anyone tell me how to do this in some easy
> steps.
If you can show what you did, then someone can point out the
mistake, and I may be able to improve the documentation.
is message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/VERP-postfix-issue.-tp33985639p33985639.html
Sent from the Postfix mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
year or more.)
>
> Who has some time available now?
>
> -
> http://davestechshop.net blog
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://www.nabble.com/looking-to-pay-for-problem-solving-on-minor-Postfix-issue-tp21711590p21711590.html
> Sent from the Postfix mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 1:30 PM, Evan Platt wrote:
> While I'll probably get flamed for this...
> There are probably tons of people who'd jump at the chance for this - easy
> money. I'm one of them - I love easy money. If I knew enough postfix, I'd
> jump on this. But as it is, I know just enoug
While I'll probably get flamed for this...
There are probably tons of people who'd jump at the chance for this -
easy money. I'm one of them - I love easy money. If I knew enough
postfix, I'd jump on this. But as it is, I know just enough to be dangerous.
Your best bet is to - excuse the expr
I have paid for
consulting like this many times before on various open source projects over
the last year or more.)
Who has some time available now?
-
http://davestechshop.net blog
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/looking-to-pay-for-problem-solving-on-minor-Postfix-issue-tp21
38 matches
Mail list logo
