Hi,
On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 6:31 PM, Viktor Dukhovni
wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 03:45:25PM -0400, Alex wrote:
>
>> I see for the postconf(5) entry for reject_rhsbl_client is:
>>
>> reject_rhsbl_client rbl_domain=d.d.d.d
>
> That "=d.d.d.d" is your choice of optional filter on the RBL's
> re
On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 03:45:25PM -0400, Alex wrote:
> I see for the postconf(5) entry for reject_rhsbl_client is:
>
> reject_rhsbl_client rbl_domain=d.d.d.d
That "=d.d.d.d" is your choice of optional filter on the RBL's
reply.
> In my smtpd_recipient_restrictions I'm doing the following:
>
>
Hi,
On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 3:56 PM, Alex wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 12:45 AM, Viktor Dukhovni
> wrote:
>> On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 07:59:29PM -0400, Alex wrote:
>>
>>> Oct 21 19:56:10 mail01 postfix/smtpd[20778]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT
>>> from bx1.c4xf.com[66.150.190.74]: 554 5.7.1
On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 03:56:30PM -0400, Alex wrote:
> >> Oct 21 19:56:10 mail01 postfix/smtpd[20778]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT
> >> from bx1.c4xf.com[66.150.190.74]: 554 5.7.1 Service unavailable;
> >> Unverified Client host [bx1.c4xf.com] blocked using
> >> mykey.dbl.dq.spamhaus.net;
> >> http://
Hi,
On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 12:45 AM, Viktor Dukhovni
wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 07:59:29PM -0400, Alex wrote:
>
>> Oct 21 19:56:10 mail01 postfix/smtpd[20778]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT
>> from bx1.c4xf.com[66.150.190.74]: 554 5.7.1 Service unavailable;
>> Unverified Client host [bx1.c4xf.com]
Hi,
On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 12:45 AM, Viktor Dukhovni
wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 07:59:29PM -0400, Alex wrote:
>
>> Oct 21 19:56:10 mail01 postfix/smtpd[20778]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT
>> from bx1.c4xf.com[66.150.190.74]: 554 5.7.1 Service unavailable;
>> Unverified Client host [bx1.c4xf.com]
On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 07:59:29PM -0400, Alex wrote:
> Oct 21 19:56:10 mail01 postfix/smtpd[20778]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT
> from bx1.c4xf.com[66.150.190.74]: 554 5.7.1 Service unavailable;
> Unverified Client host [bx1.c4xf.com] blocked using
> mykey.dbl.dq.spamhaus.net;
> http://www.spamhaus.org
Hi,
On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 7:26 PM, Benny Pedersen wrote:
> On October 22, 2015 12:39:52 AM Alex wrote:
>
>> http://rob0.nodns4.us/postscreen.html
>>
>> I'm unsure what else to do from here.
>
> http://www.postfix.org/POSTSCREEN_README.html
>
> point 7
Yes, that's exactly what I'm doing, and a
On October 22, 2015 12:39:52 AM Alex wrote:
http://rob0.nodns4.us/postscreen.html
I'm unsure what else to do from here.
http://www.postfix.org/POSTSCREEN_README.html
point 7
Hi,
On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 10:38 AM, L.P.H. van Belle wrote:
> I just point everything to http://multirbl.valli.org so they can see if they
> are listed on multiple rbl servers.
That's a great idea. How did you configure your system to do that?
> And imo thats better, then, mailing, getting r
Hi,
On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 6:53 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Alex:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'd like to obscure the names of the DNSBLs that we use in response to
>> emails that are rejected. I've set up postscreen_dnsbl_reply_map and
>> it's working properly for most:
>>
>> Oct 20 21:41:36 mail02 postfix/pos
.
So 1 point to 1 site, customers check there.
Greetz,
Louis
> -Oorspronkelijk bericht-
> Van: krem...@kreme.com [mailto:owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org] Namens
> @lbutlr
> Verzonden: woensdag 21 oktober 2015 16:28
> Aan: Postfix users
> Onderwerp: Re: Using postscre
On Oct 20, 2015, at 7:44 PM, Alex wrote:
> I'd like to obscure the names of the DNSBLs that we use in response to
> emails that are rejected.
Why would you do that? If someone hits your blocks and doesn’t know why they
were blocked you may find yourself on blocklists yourself.
--
she [Esk] wa
Alex:
> Hi,
>
> I'd like to obscure the names of the DNSBLs that we use in response to
> emails that are rejected. I've set up postscreen_dnsbl_reply_map and
> it's working properly for most:
>
> Oct 20 21:41:36 mail02 postfix/postscreen[17651]: NOQUEUE: reject:
> RCPT from [46.102.117.88]:43226:
14 matches
Mail list logo
