Hi, On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 12:45 AM, Viktor Dukhovni <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 07:59:29PM -0400, Alex wrote: > >> Oct 21 19:56:10 mail01 postfix/smtpd[20778]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT >> from bx1.c4xf.com[66.150.190.74]: 554 5.7.1 Service unavailable; >> Unverified Client host [bx1.c4xf.com] blocked using >> mykey.dbl.dq.spamhaus.net; >> http://www.spamhaus.org/query/dbl?domain=c4xf.com; >> from=<[email protected]> to=<[email protected]> proto=ESMTP >> helo=<bx1.c4xf.com> > > This was blocked by smtpd(8) NOT postscreen. Perhaps surprisingly, > The smtpd(8) service has a different mechanism for obfuscating the > DNSBL service name. > > http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#rbl_reply_maps
Thanks so much for catching this. >> # cat /etc/postfix/postscreen_dnsbl_reply_map.pcre >> mykey.dbl.dq.spamhaus.net multiple DNS-based blocklists >> mykey.zen.dq.spamhaus.net zen.spamhaus.org > > Unwise (misleading) to use a ".pcre" suffix for a texthash table. Ah yes, I failed to follow through with the change from when I was previously using pcre, thanks. Thanks also to L.P.H. van Belle for his ideas.
