On Sun, Mar 10, 2019 at 9:41 AM Scott Kitterman
wrote:
> My preference would be to press on with 3.4 (I don't mind packaging the
bug
> fixes if you don't mind releasing them), but if you are going to withdraw
3.4,
> please do it before next Sunday so I can keep it out of the next Debian
> release.
Daniele Nicolodi:
> On 10/03/2019 15:07, Wietse Venema wrote:
> > You are looking from the "we made improvements" angle. I am looking
> > from the "with hard work, we introduce 1 bug in 1000 lines of new
> > code" angle.
> >
> > In the TLS library there were 1039 additions and 559 deletions from
>
On 10/03/2019 15:07, Wietse Venema wrote:
> You are looking from the "we made improvements" angle. I am looking
> from the "with hard work, we introduce 1 bug in 1000 lines of new
> code" angle.
>
> In the TLS library there were 1039 additions and 559 deletions from
> Postfix 3.3.3 to 3.4.1 (diff
Viktor Dukhovni:
> On Sun, Mar 10, 2019 at 12:29:44PM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
>
> > > My preference would be to press on with 3.4 (I don't mind packaging the
> > > bug
> > > fixes if you don't mind releasing them), but if you are going to withdraw
> > > 3.4
> > > please do it before next S
On Sun, Mar 10, 2019 at 12:29:44PM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
> > My preference would be to press on with 3.4 (I don't mind packaging the bug
> > fixes if you don't mind releasing them), but if you are going to withdraw
> > 3.4
> > please do it before next Sunday so I can keep it out of the ne
On Sun, Mar 10, 2019 at 02:34:02PM +, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> This worked just fine until 3.3.2-4 inclusive but since I've upgraded
> my sid system yesterday and Postfix was upgraded to 3.4.1-1 I see:
>
> postfix/smtp[15202]: warning: Trust anchor files not supported
> postfix/smtp[15202
Scott Kitterman:
> On Sunday, March 10, 2019 11:11:15 AM Wietse Venema wrote:
> > Scott Kitterman:
> > > I received the bug report/patch below from a Debian user. I'm somewhat
> > > busy this weekend/week, so I decided to forward it without evaluation
> > > rather than sit on it for a week until I
To add a possible data point to the convo,
at least one distro, OpenSUSE, is already toying with apparently poorly
thought-thru patches (aka, not vetted/source here, from upstream) --
e,g, here,
https://build.opensuse.org/package/view_file/openSUSE:Factory/postfix/postfix-linux45.patch?expand=
On Sunday, March 10, 2019 11:11:15 AM Wietse Venema wrote:
> Scott Kitterman:
> > I received the bug report/patch below from a Debian user. I'm somewhat
> > busy this weekend/week, so I decided to forward it without evaluation
> > rather than sit on it for a week until I could research it.
> >
>
Scott Kitterman:
> I received the bug report/patch below from a Debian user. I'm somewhat busy
> this weekend/week, so I decided to forward it without evaluation rather than
> sit on it for a week until I could research it.
>
> I attempted to remove the distro specific noise from the report.
S
10 matches
Mail list logo
