Greetings.
I have a non-chrooted postfix running, where I reject mail from hosts
with no reverse-DNS (it kills a lot of spam, and makes a lot of people
do their reverse DNS, but thats a whole other religious discussion)
smtpd_client_restrictions = permit_mynetworks,
Søren Schrøder wrote:
Greetings.
[]
Jun 30 07:55:42 mailgate postfix/smtpd[39222]: warning: \
87.53.72.254: address not listed for hostname mail.viauc.dk
Jun 30 07:55:42 mailgate postfix/smtpd[39222]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT
from unknown[87.53.72.254]: 550 5.7.1 Client host rejected: cannot
* Søren Schrøder s...@chaos.dk:
Greetings.
I have a non-chrooted postfix running, where I reject mail from hosts
with no reverse-DNS (it kills a lot of spam, and makes a lot of people
do their reverse DNS, but thats a whole other religious discussion)
smtpd_client_restrictions =
On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 12:05, Ralf
Hildebrandtralf.hildebra...@charite.de wrote:
$ host 87.53.72.254
254.72.53.87.in-addr.arpa domain name pointer mail.viauc.dk.
$ host mail.viauc.dk
mail.viauc.dk has address 87.53.72.234
87.53.72.254 !=
87.53.72.234
I got that point, but what tricks me
* Jan P. Kessler post...@jpkessler.info:
Søren Schrøder schrieb:
On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 12:05, Ralf
Hildebrandtralf.hildebra...@charite.de wrote:
$ host 87.53.72.254
254.72.53.87.in-addr.arpa domain name pointer mail.viauc.dk.
$ host mail.viauc.dk
mail.viauc.dk has address
He knows! But he argues that the hostname COULD be found and the
WORDING of the message is (supposedly) incorrect.
Ok, got that. Although I think it's kind of nitpicking, a more precise
answer would be
Client host rejected: cannot verify your hostname, [87.53.72.254]
* Jan P. Kessler post...@jpkessler.info:
Ok, got that. Although I think it's kind of nitpicking, a more precise
answer would be
Client host rejected: cannot verify your hostname, [87.53.72.254]
Yes, that's sort-of better
--
Ralf Hildebrandt
Geschäftsbereich IT | Abteilung Netzwerk
On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 14:21, Ralf
Hildebrandtralf.hildebra...@charite.de wrote:
Client host rejected: cannot verify your hostname, [87.53.72.254]
Yes, that's sort-of better
much better - that would have saved me from looking for
resolver-related bugs. It might seem as nitpicking, but even
On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 05:05:24PM +0200, S?ren Schr?der wrote:
On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 14:21, Ralf
Hildebrandtralf.hildebra...@charite.de wrote:
Client host rejected: cannot verify your hostname, [87.53.72.254]
Yes, that's sort-of better
much better - that would have saved me from
