I'm running Postfix 2.6.5.
Is there any way to specify that sender-dependent SASL password data
should be used only when talking to one specific relay host?
Depending on the destination of a message, I need to use two different
relay hosts (defined in transport_maps). One of these relays demands
Rich Wales:
[ Charset UTF-8 unsupported, converting... ]
> I'm running Postfix 2.6.5.
>
> Is there any way to specify that sender-dependent SASL password data
> should be used only when talking to one specific relay host?
The SASL info is per relay host - Postfix isn't going to send the
same pass
I had thought / hoped this might be a straightforward question that
would require only a pointer to the right place in the documentation
(and not need a full-fledged problem report). Sorry I was mistaken.
I'm attaching my output from "postconf -n", my "transport" file, and
my "sasl_password" file
Rich Wales:
> Now, here's my problem. I want to be able to do special handling of
> mail to a subdomain (sandals.richw.org). Mail for this subdomain
> should be relayed via its own server (sandals.richw.org, as shown in
> my "transport" file) -- and this alternate relay host should *not*
> requir
> If sandals.richw.org should not require SASL authentication, then
> you should not turn on SASL authentication on sandals.richw.org.
Ah. Indeed, I had inadvertently enabled SASL authentication in the
Sandals SMTP server (smtpd_sasl_auth_enable = yes in that server's
Postfix configuration). Thi
Rich Wales:
> > If sandals.richw.org should not require SASL authentication, then
> > you should not turn on SASL authentication on sandals.richw.org.
>
> Ah. Indeed, I had inadvertently enabled SASL authentication in the
> Sandals SMTP server (smtpd_sasl_auth_enable = yes in that server's
> Post
> You're supposed to use sender-dependent AUTHENTICATION in combination
> with sender-dependent RELAYHOST. Otherwise, it makes no sense.
I was trying to describe a situation in which a site might have to deal
with two separate relay hosts . . .
where the choice of relay is dependent on the destin
Rich Wales:
> > You're supposed to use sender-dependent AUTHENTICATION in combination
> > with sender-dependent RELAYHOST. Otherwise, it makes no sense.
>
> I was trying to describe a situation in which a site might have to deal
> with two separate relay hosts . . .
That makes absolutely no sense
