On Sep 26, 2009, at 12:30 PM, mouss wrote:
== virtual_alias_maps:
/^(joe|jim|jane)-(.*)@(example\.net|example\.com)$/$1...@$3
this converts joe-...@example.com to joe+...@example.com
If you don't want to generate the file (and update it when you add
users), you can use mysql or friends.
Erick Calder wrote:
> On Sep 25, 2009, at 3:07 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
>
>> Erick Calder:
>>> On Sep 25, 2009, at 2:30 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
>
>
>
You can't replace the delimiter. That would break other people's
transit mail, among many things.
>>>
>>> I'm not sure I understand...
On Sep 26, 2009, at 0:08, Barney Desmond
wrote:
LuKreme: sure, it's easy to describe the generally-expected behaviour,
but I suspect Wietse's point is that you're welcome to write the patch
and make sure nothing breaks. *grin*
Aye, there's the rub.
2009/9/26 Erick Calder :
> oh, I think i get it. if server A is just relaying to server B, it will get
> e/j...@arix.com and hand e+j...@arix.com to B. I'm not sure I understand
> how that would break the mail (since e+j...@arix.com) is valid and will
> still be received. of course, if B is conf
On Sep 25, 2009, at 15:30, wie...@porcupine.org (Wietse Venema) wrote:
What if one address matches more than one element in your delimiter
set?
Only match on the first delimited found, seems like the best idea.
user.extension-word+...@example.com
If the delimited is + then the extension is e
On Sep 25, 2009, at 3:07 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
Erick Calder:
On Sep 25, 2009, at 2:30 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
You can't replace the delimiter. That would break other people's
transit mail, among many things.
I'm not sure I understand... perhaps we're speaking of 2 different
things.
Erick Calder:
> On Sep 25, 2009, at 2:30 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
>
> > Erick Calder:
> >> On Sep 25, 2009, at 12:20 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> >>
> >>> Erick Calder:
> >>>
> this brings to mind: I've long used plussed addresses and love that
> feature but my only complaint is that many
On Sep 25, 2009, at 2:30 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
Erick Calder:
On Sep 25, 2009, at 12:20 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
Erick Calder:
this brings to mind: I've long used plussed addresses and love that
feature but my only complaint is that many systems disallow the +
sign
in an e-mail address...
Erick Calder:
> On Sep 25, 2009, at 12:20 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
>
> > Erick Calder:
> >
> >> this brings to mind: I've long used plussed addresses and love that
> >> feature but my only complaint is that many systems disallow the +
> >> sign
> >> in an e-mail address... is there a way to have
On Sep 25, 2009, at 12:20 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
Erick Calder:
this brings to mind: I've long used plussed addresses and love that
feature but my only complaint is that many systems disallow the +
sign
in an e-mail address... is there a way to have a character bag work
as
the delimiter?
Erick Calder:
> On Sep 25, 2009, at 6:34 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
>
> > Patrick Ben Koetter:
> >> Everybody seems to use recipient delimiters. I wonder if there's a
> >> standard
> >> that specifies a recipient delimiter functionality or did it just
> >> appear one
> >> day and people adopted
On Sep 25, 2009, at 6:34 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
Patrick Ben Koetter:
Everybody seems to use recipient delimiters. I wonder if there's a
standard
that specifies a recipient delimiter functionality or did it just
appear one
day and people adopted it without a spec or anything.
Anybody know
Patrick Ben Koetter:
> Everybody seems to use recipient delimiters. I wonder if there's a standard
> that specifies a recipient delimiter functionality or did it just appear one
> day and people adopted it without a spec or anything.
>
> Anybody knows?
As far as I know, the basic email RFCs have
Everybody seems to use recipient delimiters. I wonder if there's a standard
that specifies a recipient delimiter functionality or did it just appear one
day and people adopted it without a spec or anything.
Anybody knows?
p...@rick
--
All technical questions asked privately will be automatical
14 matches
Mail list logo
