On Mon, Aug 04, 2008 at 02:40:54PM -0400, Brian Evans - Postfix List wrote:
> Nicolas KOWALSKI wrote:
>> On Mon, Aug 04, 2008 at 12:29:34PM -0400, Brian Evans - Postfix List wrote:
>>
A *better* way is force them to Authenticate using SASL.
See http://www.postfix.org/SASL_README.html
>
Nicolas KOWALSKI wrote:
On Mon, Aug 04, 2008 at 12:29:34PM -0400, Brian Evans - Postfix List wrote:
A *better* way is force them to Authenticate using SASL.
See http://www.postfix.org/SASL_README.html
Postfix supports either Cyrus or Dovecot SASL.
P.S. This is if you fully trust and
On Mon, Aug 04, 2008 at 12:29:34PM -0400, Brian Evans - Postfix List wrote:
> Brian Evans - Postfix List wrote:
>> Nicolas KOWALSKI wrote:
The client said 'EHLO demisel.dyndns.org'.
This is the value that check_helo_access can find, though somewhat
unreliable to whitelist.
>>>
>>>
Brian Evans - Postfix List wrote:
Nicolas KOWALSKI wrote:
The client said 'EHLO demisel.dyndns.org'.
This is the value that check_helo_access can find, though somewhat
unreliable to whitelist.
I apparently have no other choices to whitelist-before-rbl such a
dynamic pool's host.
Than
Nicolas KOWALSKI wrote:
The client said 'EHLO demisel.dyndns.org'.
This is the value that check_helo_access can find, though somewhat
unreliable to whitelist.
I apparently have no other choices to whitelist-before-rbl such a
dynamic pool's host.
Thanks to all,
A *better* way is fo
On Mon, Aug 04, 2008 at 10:56:36AM -0400, Brian Evans - Postfix List wrote:
> Nicolas KOWALSKI wrote:
>> On Mon, Aug 04, 2008 at 08:58:01AM -0400, Charles Marcus wrote:
>>
>>> On 8/4/2008, Nicolas KOWALSKI ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>>>
Aug 4 14:17:18 petole postfix/smtpd[23545]: NOQU
Nicolas KOWALSKI wrote:
On Mon, Aug 04, 2008 at 08:58:01AM -0400, Charles Marcus wrote:
Let me give this one a try... I *think* i see the problem...
On 8/4/2008, Nicolas KOWALSKI ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Aug 4 14:17:18 petole postfix/smtpd[23545]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT
from 225.96.6
On Mon, Aug 04, 2008 at 08:58:01AM -0400, Charles Marcus wrote:
> Let me give this one a try... I *think* i see the problem...
>
> On 8/4/2008, Nicolas KOWALSKI ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>> Aug 4 14:17:18 petole postfix/smtpd[23545]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT
>> from 225.96.68-86.rev.gaoland.net[86.6
Stan Hoeppner wrote:
Hello Nicolas,
Try this:
Remove 'check_client_access hash:/etc/postfix/client_access' from
smtpd_recipient_restrictions. Add the following line in main.cf
somewhere before/above smtpd_recipient_restrictions:
smtpd_client_restrictions = hash:/etc/postfix/client_access
Hello Nicolas,
Try this:
Remove 'check_client_access hash:/etc/postfix/client_access' from
smtpd_recipient_restrictions. Add the following line in main.cf
somewhere before/above smtpd_recipient_restrictions:
smtpd_client_restrictions = hash:/etc/postfix/client_access
And make sure you 'pos
Let me give this one a try... I *think* i see the problem...
On 8/4/2008, Nicolas KOWALSKI ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Aug 4 14:17:18 petole postfix/smtpd[23545]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT
from 225.96.68-86.rev.gaoland.net[86.68.96.225]: 554 5.7.1 Service
unavailable; Client host [86.68.96.225] bloc
Hello,
I would like to whitelist a specific host, because it is currently
listed in the zen rbl, but I am unable to do so.
Here is a sample log of the rejected host connecting to my postfix:
Aug 4 14:17:17 petole postfix/smtpd[23545]: connect from
225.96.68-86.rev.gaoland.net[86.68.96.225]
Au
12 matches
Mail list logo