"alias_maps" with mysql ignored

2011-05-27 Thread Reindl Harald
hm - has anybody an idea why the following message is expanded to "myorigin" instead using "alias_maps" and relay to the external address? > [root@srv-rhsoft:~]$ mail harry > Subject: hm > test > . > EOT [root@srv-rhsoft:~]$ postconf -n alias_maps alias_maps = proxy:mysql

Re: "alias_maps" with mysql ignored

2011-05-27 Thread Brian Evans - Postfix List
On 5/27/2011 10:44 AM, Reindl Harald wrote: > hm - has anybody an idea why the following message is expanded to "myorigin" > instead using "alias_maps" and relay to the external address? > [root@srv-rhsoft:~]$ postconf -n alias_maps > alias_maps = proxy:mysql:/etc/postfix/mysql-aliases.cf > > [root

Re: "alias_maps" with mysql ignored

2011-05-27 Thread lst_hoe02
Zitat von Reindl Harald : hm - has anybody an idea why the following message is expanded to "myorigin" instead using "alias_maps" and relay to the external address? [root@srv-rhsoft:~]$ mail harry Subject: hm test . EOT As far as i know alias_maps is used by "local". If you don't have set

Re: "alias_maps" with mysql ignored

2011-05-27 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 27.05.2011 16:54, schrieb Brian Evans - Postfix List: > On 5/27/2011 10:44 AM, Reindl Harald wrote: >> hm - has anybody an idea why the following message is expanded to "myorigin" >> instead using "alias_maps" and relay to the external address? >> [root@srv-rhsoft:~]$ postconf -n alias_maps >> a

Re: "alias_maps" with mysql ignored

2011-05-27 Thread Brian Evans - Postfix List
On 5/27/2011 11:01 AM, Reindl Harald wrote: > Am 27.05.2011 16:54, schrieb Brian Evans - Postfix List: >> On 5/27/2011 10:44 AM, Reindl Harald wrote: >>> hm - has anybody an idea why the following message is expanded to "myorigin" >>> instead using "alias_maps" and relay to the external address? >>

Re: "alias_maps" with mysql ignored

2011-05-27 Thread Noel Jones
On 5/27/2011 10:01 AM, Reindl Harald wrote: Am 27.05.2011 16:54, schrieb Brian Evans - Postfix List: On 5/27/2011 10:44 AM, Reindl Harald wrote: hm - has anybody an idea why the following message is expanded to "myorigin" instead using "alias_maps" and relay to the external address? [root@srv-r

Re: "alias_maps" with mysql ignored

2011-05-27 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 27.05.2011 17:07, schrieb Brian Evans - Postfix List: > On 5/27/2011 11:01 AM, Reindl Harald wrote: >> Am 27.05.2011 16:54, schrieb Brian Evans - Postfix List: >>> On 5/27/2011 10:44 AM, Reindl Harald wrote: hm - has anybody an idea why the following message is expanded to "myorigin

Re: "alias_maps" with mysql ignored

2011-05-27 Thread Noel Jones
On 5/27/2011 10:14 AM, Reindl Harald wrote: myorigin = hostname = ltmp-domain, that is clear Indeed. Bare user names will be delivered to lmtp-domain and will not consult alias_maps. what i do not understand is why it is expanded to myorigin Bare addresses are always expanded to address

Re: "alias_maps" with mysql ignored

2011-05-27 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 27.05.2011 17:42, schrieb Noel Jones: > local aliases are not expanded until final delivery by local(8). so i am to stoopid to understand what exactly is "local" >> replace /etc/aliases by database-backend with having something >> like "mailman" in mind > > mailman requires the list domain t

Re: "alias_maps" with mysql ignored

2011-05-27 Thread Noel Jones
On 5/27/2011 10:56 AM, Reindl Harald wrote: Am 27.05.2011 17:42, schrieb Noel Jones: local aliases are not expanded until final delivery by local(8). so i am to stoopid to understand what exactly is "local" Postfix defines "local" as a domain listed in mydestination and delivered by the lo