> On 24 April 2018, at 13:48, Wietse Venema wrote:
>
> Doug Hardie:
>>> On 22 April 2018, at 05:50, Wietse Venema wrote:
>>>
>>> Doug Hardie:
I understood from the dnsblog man page that each dnsblog process
only lives for a "limited amount
Doug Hardie:
> > On 22 April 2018, at 05:50, Wietse Venema wrote:
> >
> > Doug Hardie:
> >> I understood from the dnsblog man page that each dnsblog process
> >> only lives for a "limited amount of time". I noticed this because
> >> I have over 50 dnsblog processes running
> On 22 April 2018, at 05:50, Wietse Venema wrote:
>
> Doug Hardie:
>> I understood from the dnsblog man page that each dnsblog process
>> only lives for a "limited amount of time". I noticed this because
>> I have over 50 dnsblog processes running on a fairly light duty
Doug Hardie:
> I understood from the dnsblog man page that each dnsblog process
> only lives for a "limited amount of time". I noticed this because
> I have over 50 dnsblog processes running on a fairly light duty
> postfix server. Some of them are over a week old. At first I
> thought they
I understood from the dnsblog man page that each dnsblog process only lives for
a "limited amount of time". I noticed this because I have over 50 dnsblog
processes running on a fairly light duty postfix server. Some of them are over
a week old. At first I thought they must have been