Does this help?
Wietse
smtp_dns_resolver_options (default: empty)
DNS Resolver options for the Postfix SMTP client. Specify zero or more
of the following options, separated by comma or whitespace. Option
names are case-sensitive. Some options refer to domain
Am 05.05.2011 04:11, schrieb Matthias Andree:
Now, possible workarounds:
- be sure that /etc/resolv.conf contains a search list where at least
one of the listed domains has a direct localhost resolving to 127.0.0.1
and/or ::1. Say, if you have search example.com another.example, at
least
Am 05.05.2011 13:19, schrieb Wietse Venema:
Does this help?
Wietse
smtp_dns_resolver_options (default: empty)
DNS Resolver options for the Postfix SMTP client. Specify zero or more
of the following options, separated by comma or whitespace. Option
names
On Thu, May 05, 2011 at 03:49:35PM +0200, Matthias Andree wrote:
Executive summary:
We are facing a massive bug in the GNU glibc 2.11 and eglibc 2.13
resolvers which fails to even attempt a query for a name without dots if
RES_DEFNAMES is unset. FreeBSD 8.2, DragonflyBSD 2.10 and Solaris
Am 05.05.2011 17:33, schrieb Victor Duchovni:
On Thu, May 05, 2011 at 03:49:35PM +0200, Matthias Andree wrote:
Executive summary:
We are facing a massive bug in the GNU glibc 2.11 and eglibc 2.13
resolvers which fails to even attempt a query for a name without dots if
RES_DEFNAMES is
On Thu, May 05, 2011 at 05:58:46PM +0200, Matthias Andree wrote:
Do NOT use [localhost] as an SMTP nexthop. I always use [127.0.0.1].
If IPv6 works well for you, you can use [::1].
Hi Victor,
Why do you recommend so, now that Postfix strips RES_DEFNAMES from
_res.options by default?
Am 05.05.2011 18:23, schrieb Victor Duchovni:
You know exactly what you mean when you use [localhost] as a nexthop,
why not say so? What's the point of jumping through a pile of indirection
and shared libraries just to arrive at an address that every administrator
knows in advance. In fact,
On Thu, May 05, 2011 at 08:37:01PM +0200, Matthias Andree wrote:
I had checked the Postfix 2.8 release notes immediately, but they bore
no references to this particular HISTORY entry:
It is in the 2.8 release notes:
Major changes - dns lookup
--
[Incompat 20100827]
Am 05.05.2011 20:46, schrieb Victor Duchovni:
On Thu, May 05, 2011 at 08:37:01PM +0200, Matthias Andree wrote:
I had checked the Postfix 2.8 release notes immediately, but they bore
no references to this particular HISTORY entry:
It is in the 2.8 release notes:
Major changes - dns