On 3/30/2020 8:18 AM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
* Matus UHLAR:
remote senders don't understand the message too often.
On 30.03.20 14:55, Ralph Seichter wrote:
Using "show_user_unknown_table_name = no" will hide the table name.
That might reduce some of the confusion.
I'd prefer to add
On 3/30/2020 8:18 AM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
* Matus UHLAR:
remote senders don't understand the message too often.
On 30.03.20 14:55, Ralph Seichter wrote:
Using "show_user_unknown_table_name = no" will hide the table name.
That might reduce some of the confusion.
I'd prefer to add
* Matus UHLAR:
remote senders don't understand the message too often.
On 30.03.20 14:55, Ralph Seichter wrote:
Using "show_user_unknown_table_name = no" will hide the table name.
That might reduce some of the confusion.
I'd prefer to add short translation of the default message.
yes, the
* Matus UHLAR:
> remote senders don't understand the message too often.
Using "show_user_unknown_table_name = no" will hide the table name.
That might reduce some of the confusion.
-Ralph
Hello,
can anyone advise me, what's the easiest way to modify error message:
"User unknown in local recipient table"
if we use:
- virtual aliases
- aliases
- password file?
remote senders don't understand the message too often.
Thanks
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ;
