I built and install 2.6.x today:
% make makefile
% make
% make install
on a pristine machine and tried the
multi-instance support. I did this (fresh from my shell, no edits):
r...@hanni:/etc/postfix# postmulti -l -a
- - y /etc/postfix
r...@hanni:/etc/postfix#
Ralf Hildebrandt:
> /usr/libexec/postfix/postfix-script: 346: /bin/env: not found
Replace "/bin/env find" by "`which find`.
Wietse
On Fri, Jun 05, 2009 at 10:05:16AM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Ralf Hildebrandt:
> > /usr/libexec/postfix/postfix-script: 346: /bin/env: not found
>
> Replace "/bin/env find" by "`which find`.
Perhaps /usr/bin/env, will be more portable? It seems that /usr/bin/env
is "more" correct than /bin/e
On Fri, 5 Jun 2009 12:51:54 -0400
Victor Duchovni wrote:
>Perhaps /usr/bin/env, will be more portable? It seems that /usr/bin/env
>is "more" correct than /bin/env for both Linux and Solaris, does it
>also work on *BSD systems? Also "find" is /usr/bin/find on both.
FreeBSD:
~ $ which env
/usr/bi
Victor Duchovni:
> On Fri, Jun 05, 2009 at 10:05:16AM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
>
> > Ralf Hildebrandt:
> > > /usr/libexec/postfix/postfix-script: 346: /bin/env: not found
> >
> > Replace "/bin/env find" by "`which find`.
>
> Perhaps /usr/bin/env, will be more portable? It seems that /usr/bin/
On Fri, 5 Jun 2009, Wietse Venema wrote:
Victor Duchovni:
On Fri, Jun 05, 2009 at 10:05:16AM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
Ralf Hildebrandt:
/usr/libexec/postfix/postfix-script: 346: /bin/env: not found
Replace "/bin/env find" by "`which find`.
Perhaps /usr/bin/env, will be more portable?
On Fri, Jun 05, 2009 at 03:30:55PM -0400, Rob Foehl wrote:
> Surprisingly enough, which isn't a standard utility -- and it's not
> installed by default in the "minimal" package sets on several platforms,
> mostly Linux variants. (Yes, this is annoying.)
>
> /usr/bin/env is probably the safest b
| "type" is a built-in in POSIX shells, and even the pre-historic SunOS
| /bin/sh has a "type" built-in, be it a bare-bones version that does not
| support the "-p" switch, that is sufficient. So another possibility is:
|
| set -- `type find`
| shift `expr $# - 1`
| # Now, $1 is the fu
