Re: report from google relate to failed dkim

2017-12-29 Thread Dominic Raferd
You are still top-posting please don't... See bottom for my reply... On 29 December 2017 at 06:21, Poliman - Serwis wrote: > But "signing domain" and domain in "From" will never be matched. Server has > own domain s1.domain.net. On this server are hosted few websites. These

Re: report from google relate to failed dkim

2017-12-28 Thread Poliman - Serwis
But "signing domain" and domain in "From" will never be matched. Server has own domain s1.domain.net. On this server are hosted few websites. These have another domains than the server fqdn. In report from google I see fail in dkim row but for IP of the server. I don't know why there is IP not

Re: report from google relate to failed dkim

2017-12-27 Thread Dominic Raferd
Please bottom post on this list (and see below) On 28 December 2017 at 07:05, Poliman - Serwis wrote: > For particular domain from report dkim works well. I checked it here > http://dkimcore.org/c/keycheck. Mails from this domain are sent by > s1.domain.net server. Should be

Re: report from google relate to failed dkim

2017-12-27 Thread Poliman - Serwis
For particular domain from report dkim works well. I checked it here http://dkimcore.org/c/keycheck. Mails from this domain are sent by s1.domain.net server. Should be dkim configured for domain name of the server which corresponds to IP mentioned earlier? 2017-12-28 7:46 GMT+01:00 Poliman -

Re: report from google relate to failed dkim

2017-12-27 Thread Poliman - Serwis
All is clear but how setup dmarc per IP address of the server if dmarc is based on spf and dkim which are based on particular domain? 2017-12-27 10:37 GMT+01:00 Dominic Raferd : > On 27 December 2017 at 07:22, Poliman - Serwis wrote: > > I configured

Re: report from google relate to failed dkim

2017-12-27 Thread Dominic Raferd
On 27 December 2017 at 10:06, li...@lazygranch.com wrote: > On Wed, 27 Dec 2017 09:37:24 + > Dominic Raferd wrote: >> ... DMARC reports from mail providers are very useful in checking for >> problems with spf/dkim/dmarc before one moves to

Re: report from google relate to failed dkim

2017-12-27 Thread Juri Haberland
On 27.12.2017 08:22, Poliman - Serwis wrote: > I configured yesterday spf, dkim, dmarc for example.com. Today I got report > in xml on my mailbox. Attached. One from addresses has dkim failed - marked > in orange. What that means and how to fix it? I use ubuntu 16.04 lts and > postfix: Judging

Re: report from google relate to failed dkim

2017-12-27 Thread li...@lazygranch.com
On Wed, 27 Dec 2017 09:37:24 + Dominic Raferd wrote: > On 27 December 2017 at 07:22, Poliman - Serwis > wrote: > > I configured yesterday spf, dkim, dmarc for example.com. Today I > > got report in xml on my mailbox. Attached. One from addresses

Re: report from google relate to failed dkim

2017-12-27 Thread Dominic Raferd
On 27 December 2017 at 07:22, Poliman - Serwis wrote: > I configured yesterday spf, dkim, dmarc for example.com. Today I got report > in xml on my mailbox. Attached. One from addresses has dkim failed - marked > in orange... This is a DMARC report from Gmail and so a more

report from google relate to failed dkim

2017-12-26 Thread Poliman - Serwis
I configured yesterday spf, dkim, dmarc for example.com. Today I got report in xml on my mailbox. Attached. One from addresses has dkim failed - marked in orange. What that means and how to fix it? I use ubuntu 16.04 lts and postfix: root@s1:~# postconf | grep version