On 2 Feb 2021, at 8:46, Tim Coote wrote:
Before I pollute the mailing list with all the gory details. Is this
a known/expected/ever seen behaviour?
SRS rewriting should not operate on ANY header addresses. It is
designed, like SPF, to operate on the SMTP envelope sender.
It is normal for
Before I pollute the mailing list with all the gory details. Is this a
known/expected/ever seen behaviour?
SRS rewriting should not operate on ANY header addresses. It is
designed, like SPF, to operate on the SMTP envelope sender.
It is normal for automated messages such as bounces to have a
>>
>> Before I pollute the mailing list with all the gory details. Is this a
>> known/expected/ever seen behaviour?
>
> SRS rewriting should not operate on ANY header addresses. It is designed,
> like SPF, to operate on the SMTP envelope sender.
>
> It is normal for automated messages such as
On 1 Feb 2021, at 14:35, Tim Coote wrote:
Hullo
I’ve been running my email domain using postfix for most, possibly
all of this century. Recently, I’ve had to add in the SPF/DMARC
capabilities, and postsrsd to rewrite the return addresses of
forwarded email. I do have a number of users who fo
Hullo
I’ve been running my email domain using postfix for most, possibly all of this
century. Recently, I’ve had to add in the SPF/DMARC capabilities, and postsrsd
to rewrite the return addresses of forwarded email. I do have a number of users
who forward using the Unix ~/.forward mechanism. R
