Steve:
> Original-Nachricht
> > Datum: Fri, 16 Jul 2010 16:44:23 -0400
> > Von: Charles Marcus
> > An: postfix-users@postfix.org
> > Betreff: Re: Better spam filter for postfix
Steve, I request that you end this thread.
Wietse
Corey Chandler:
> Jul 16 14:52:13 Leavenworth postfix/pipe[31344]: fatal: user=
> command-line attribute specifies mail system vmail group id 1008
As the error message says, you MUST NOT run non-Postfix programs
with Postfix user or group privileges.
Wietse
Christopher Hilton:
> Outlook express can be convinced to use 587 but my experience with
> my users I find that Outlook sometimes changes the port setting
> from 587 to 465 during configuration.
>
> You will need a certificate for this but if the number of clients
> is small you don't have to go to
Corey Chandler:
> I've had to run postfix set-permissions on my box to resolve a few
> ownership issues. On this platform (Debian Lenny) a few things aren't what
> set-permissions expects to find-- largely man pages that aren't compressed,
> slightly different pathing, map files that aren't necess
Jerry:
> I have been having an argument with an associate of mine who uses Exim
> for his company's mail server. He claims that Exim is totally compliant
> and that Postfix users claim otherwise to simply poison users against
> using Exim. I have used Postfix for 4 years and would never dream of
>
Victor Duchovni:
> On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 06:17:52AM +0200, Stefan Foerster wrote:
>
> > * Victor Duchovni :
> > > On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 12:14:17PM +0200, Stefan Foerster wrote:
> > >
> > > > Given: A dedicated Postfix instance, configured to accept mails from
> > > > SASL authenticated users.
Ram:
> One server of ours just accepts the mails from clients and then relays
> the mails to other servers.
> Since there is almost no mail queued on the server , I think it is will
> be good to mount /var/spool/postfix on a tmpfs partition.
>
> The machine ( linux Centos 5.4 + postfix 2.7 ) ha
Ralf Hildebrandt:
> * Ansgar Wiechers :
>
> > The issue with this attack is that it might exhaust CPU resources on the
> > server without having to saturate the bandwidth, due to cryptographic
> > operations required by SSL.
>
> Correct.
>
> > And that it seems to use BitTorrent as a multiplicat
Kai Krakow:
> Mystery solved:
>
> Adding "-O2" to CFLAGS (an "-Ox" parameter was missing) solved the problem.
> Seems to be an GCC issue. I don't know if postfix should compile and work fine
> without this or with another optimizer level.
It *should* work with all optimization levels. except for:
Ram:
> One server of ours just accepts the mails from clients and then relays
> the mails to other servers.
> Since there is almost no mail queued on the server , I think it is will
> be good to mount /var/spool/postfix on a tmpfs partition.
You will lose all mail in the queue when the system cr
Kai Krakow:
> Bas,
>
> why should that make a difference if it was already proven that
> changing the optimization level of the compiler fixes the issue, and
> that it is probably a special corner case of hardened gcc3.4? I
> suppose it has to do with it's stack protecting techniques etc.
That is
Patrick Ben Koetter:
> I can put a mail on HOLD and release it later with the postsuper command.
> That's great for debugging purposes, but only if I need to send the message
> just once.
>
> Would it be possible to expand the postsuper command with an optional command
> line parameter that releas
Sahil Tandon:
> Time of death on Thu, Jul 22: 01:57:34 UTC
>
> END OF THREAD. Please? :-)
Yes. I was posting that when my hotel's internet connection broke.
TRESPASSERS WILL BE REMOVED FROM THE LIST.
Wietse
Patrick Ben Koetter:
> > > Postfix queue files should not have multiple hard links.
> > >
> > > Consider using RSYNC to COPY the file from the hold queue to the
> > > incoming queue, using the same file name.
> >
> > Once it's there, will it take the same path as the initial mail (on
> > HOLD) wo
Vasya Pupkin:
> Hello.
>
> First, I have spent two days reading articles and searching web for
> solution but failed there. I am using postfix as an mx for my domains,
> it accpets mail for different addresses withing my domains which is
> then forwarded to other external domains, i.e. google.com
Vasya Pupkin:
> > In particular, if a bounce is caused by a downstream MTA rejecting
> > an email because it's too large, then that's an unavoidable bounce.
> > But it's also unlikely to be backscatter
>
> In my case it was one of the most reasons why my server acted as a
> backscatterer.
You hav
Victor Duchovni:
> On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 09:24:52PM +0200, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
>
> > * Victor Duchovni :
> >
> > > Note, if rsync propagates file permissions before it copies file contents,
> > > an incomplete queue file could be picked up by the queue manager before
> > > it is completely
Mark Goodge:
> OK, I'm sure this is in the documentation somewhere, but my brain isn't
> working this morning and I need to get a fix for this fairly quickly, so
> I'm asking here instead :-)
>
> Anyway, I currently have a situation where mail is currently received by
> machine A, which then fo
>
> How can I help you to diagnose & solve the error?.
With POSTFIX "smtpd -v" and "cleanup -v" logging for:
- One message that demonstrates the problem.
- The EXACT SAME MESSAGE with one letter changed in the recipient
address, so that it does not demonstrate the problem.
Do not send verbos
Jesus Cea:
> For instance, in sendmail I see things like this in the logs:
>
> Jul 23 20:10:09 XXX sendmail[9338]: [ID 801593 mail.info]
> o6NIA6ef009338: Milter: to=, reject=451 Temporaly delayed.
> Try later (3540)
...
> Jul 23 20:10:56 XXX sendmail[9374]: [ID 801593 mail.info]
> o6NIArA7009374:
Jesus Cea:
> On 23/07/10 20:29, Wietse Venema wrote:
> > - The EXACT SAME MESSAGE with one letter changed in the recipient
> > address, so that it does not demonstrate the problem.
>
> Only one letter?. Then would be a non existant account. Is this test
> useful to you?
Jesus Cea:
> On 23/07/10 20:29, Wietse Venema wrote:
> >>
> >> How can I help you to diagnose & solve the error?.
> >
> > With POSTFIX "smtpd -v" and "cleanup -v" logging for:
> >
> > - One message that demonstrates the pr
Jesus Cea:
> On 23/07/10 23:09, Wietse Venema wrote:
> > This has nothing to do with milters.
> >
> > A diff between the logs shows that YOU disconnect from the submission
> > port before POSTFIX has logged the final MIME boundary.
> >
> > I suspect that
Jesus Cea:
-- Start of PGP signed section.
> On 24/07/10 01:28, Wietse Venema wrote:
> > 2) I repeat, the problem is that Postfix does not recognize the
> > end of the message.
>
> I don't send the message completely. According to thunderbird, it sends
The logging s
Jesus Cea:
> Wietse, if you can confirm that postfix DOESN'T send to milter modules
> the headers, EOH, body and EOB *UNTIL* it has received the complete
> message via SMTP, I think I can move this issue to Thunderbird bugzilla.
AFTER Postfix receives the ``.'', THEN Postfix
sends headers, EOH, bo
Wietse:
> Postfix does not log message changes unless you turn on debug
> logging. Message changes can be quite extensive, such as deleting
> a header, adding a header, or replacing the message body. Such
> logging is not of interest for production usage.
Jesus Cea:
> I find it VERY useful for pr
> Jonathan Amiez put forth on 7/27/2010 8:26 AM:
> > Le mardi 27 juillet 2010 15:15:24, Fons van der Beek a _crit :
>
> >> domain.com smpt:sbsserver:25
>
>
>
> >> Anyone an idea what is wrong
>
> > Double-check your config, you wrote "sm
Stan Hoeppner:
> Fons van der Beek put forth on 7/27/2010 10:53 AM:
> > sorry...
> > i just didn't see it.
> > very stupid, but also gratefull
>
> Don't sweat it. Laugh about it instead. Exercise a little self deprecating
> humor. Whenever this kind of thing happens, _always_ sa
donovan jeffrey j:
> version 2.5.5,
>
> greetings
> im upgrading a couple of xserves to 10.6 from 10.4. the main.cf
> used to be pretty straight forward. The default main.cf on 10.6
> snow leopard server has overwhelmed my old eyeballs. may new lines
> most i understand but they pretty much list e
donovan jeffrey j:
>
> On Jul 29, 2010, at 7:16 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
>
> > The simplest way to upgrade an existing configuration is:
> >
> > - Back up the new main.cf, master.cf, postfix-files, postfix-script
> > and post-install files.
> >
> >
donovan jeffrey j:
> thanks for the reply, i did the update and have no errors on postfix check.
>
> i have setup a test on my mx server to transport mail for
> lukeskywal...@beth.k12.pa.us to mx2.beth.k12.pa.us ( my new 10.6 filter )
>
> so far my mail2 primary mx can send to the filter (mx2).
Christopher Adams:
> Hello,
>
> I have a new Postfix install running under Centos 5.3. I am able to send
> mail from the command line, but anything sent from another machine is not
> sent, nor is it logged. I have read the debugging information and hopefully,
> I am sending some useful information
Mike Morris:
> Hi,
>
> I'm working on a mail server deployment that will only have one server
> for MX and SASL submission purposes. Generally I like to have separate
> Postfix instances to handle a specific task. In this case I'm running
> in to problems when the submission instance uses the sa
Peter L. Berghold:
> Hi folks,
>
> In pseudo code here's how I want my outside mail exchange system to
> behave:
>
On the Postfix server:
/etc/postfix/main.cf:
smtpd_recipient_restrictions =
permit_mynetworks
permit_sasl_authenticated <- for the roaming laptop
...
Mike Morris:
[ Charset ISO-8859-1 unsupported, converting... ]
> On 08/01/2010 09:29 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> > Mike Morris:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I'm working on a mail server deployment that will only have one server
> >> for MX and SASL submi
subscri...@viliar.net.ru:
> On Mon, 02 Aug 2010 09:02:41 -0400, Brian Evans - Postfix List
> wrote:
> > On 8/2/2010 5:18 AM, subscri...@viliar.net.ru wrote:
> >> I use postfix with sqlite patch about 2 years with small fix to
> function
> >> name. I
> >> suggest to make something like this for pos
subscri...@viliar.net.ru:
> On Mon, 2 Aug 2010 14:36:35 -0400 (EDT), Wietse Venema
> wrote:
> > subscri...@viliar.net.ru:
> >> On Mon, 02 Aug 2010 09:02:41 -0400, Brian Evans - Postfix List
> >> wrote:
> >> > On 8/2/2010 5:18 AM, subscri...@viliar.net.r
Lefteris Tsintjelis:
> On Aug 2, 2010, at 10:47 am, Lefteris Tsintjelis wrote:
>
> > On Aug 2, 2010, at 3:59 am, Phill Macey wrote:
> >
> >> On 2 August 2010 10:10, Lefteris Tsintjelis wrote:
> >>> This warning does not make any sense at all since there is no such thing
> >>> listed in mydestin
See http://www.postfix.org/DEBUG_README.html#logging
When Postfix does not receive or deliver mail, the first order of business is
to look for errors that prevent Postfix from working properly:
% egrep '(warning|error|fatal|panic):' /some/log/file | more
Note: the most important message is
Jay G. Scott:
> every time i try to go to a newer version of postfix, the
> installation overwrites the previous version. and that
You can choose the install location.
Wietse
Mike Morris:
> approach. Out of curiosity, what would your reasons be for suggesting
> running postscreen with 2.7 rather than using a 2.8 snapshot? Wouldn't
> similar instability concerns about the latter apply to the former?
The difference is that stable release features not change except
in c
Manuel Mely:
> Hi,
>
> I've programmed one script for checking the allowed message size for
> every user on my network. I started programming this script based on
> the greylist perl example script that it's in the postfix
> documentation[1] (very nice start point).
> The script is working well bu
Zhou, Yan:
> Hi there,
>
> I have seen success stories with SMTP AUTH integrating with both MySQL
> and LDAP, but our user/configuration are stored in Oracle 10g database.
> Is there any info. on integrating Postfix with Oracle?
If you use DOVECOT SASL, look in the DOVECOT documentation.
If you
it.
You can use different master.cf configurations for smtpd, if local
and remote clients have different limits (use a different server
IP address).
Wietse
> On 8/6/10, Wietse Venema wrote:
> > Manuel Mely:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I've programmed one script for
Manuel Mely:
> On 8/8/10, Wietse Venema wrote:
> > Manuel Mely:
> >> Hi Wietse,
> >>
> >> My server is acting as relay for my network, so my internal clients
> >> are MTAs that uses ESMTP. The problem is when other servers in
> >> internet
In case you wonder, I wrote Postfix.
Perhaps you can follow instructions in
http://www.postfix.org/.DEBUG_README.html#logging
TURN OFF -v logging before you do this.
Wietse
Dominik Storck:
> Hello Wietse,
>
> I have been tracking down to "Automatically tracing a Postfix daemon
> process" from the DEBUG_README. This is how I got the log snippet.
>
> Can't reproduce the error now after deleting unnecessary .forward files.
Please do not waste your time with verbose lo
Dominik Storck:
> Hello Wietse,
>
> I have been looking for these error messages over and over before I
> started digging deeper. There are none of the error,fatal,warning or
> panic messages before. The first error log entry to occur is the unknown
> mail transport error, really.
Looking at t
Phill Macey:
> On 10 August 2010 21:35, Wietse Venema wrote:
>
> > When you have a many-recipient "all" alias, you need to set up an
> > "owner-all" alias in the alias database (with the right-hand side
> > being the adminstrator of the "al
CJ Keist:
> I'm trying to install postfix-2.7.2-RC2 on Solaris 10 sparc system.
> Make and install goes through fine. postfix starts up with no errors.
> But getting the following errors in the log file:
>
> Aug 10 09:58:43 mail1 postfix/smtpd[173]: [ID 947731 mail.crit] fatal:
> statvfs .:
Sharma, Ashish:
> Hi,
>
> I have a postfix(postfix 2.6.5) mail receiving server.
>
> On this I have used an email filter (sendmail-jilter
> http://sendmail-jilter.sourceforge.net/) that have some of my custom code.
> Following setting is used for the milter in 'main.cf':
>
> #Milter support fo
> Aug 11 20:15:41 myhost sendmail[17048]: o7B9uJjQ015169:
> to=, ctladdr= (0/0),
> delay=15:19:22, xdelay=00:00:00, mailer=esmtp, pri=1560372,
> relay=mail.example.com., dsn=4.0.0, stat=Deferred: Connection refused by
> mail.example.com.
That is the Sendmail MTA, not POSTFIX.
Wietse
Ralf Hildebrandt:
> * Ram :
>
> > Mail in plain text format , mime encoded message
>
> OK!
>
> > Currenlty I get 40/s - 45/s
> That sounds normal. Any filtering (in these cases you should inject in
> a way that bypasses and filters)
> > But I want it to be atleast 100/s
>
> Two machineS?
> re
jason hirsh:
> I am apparently having an issue with some servers whose mail is being
> rejected because of
>
> reject_unknown_hostname
>
> the reject was shown here
>
> Aug 11 00:21:36 xxx postfix/smtpd[96422]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT
> from mail01a.yesbank.com[65.196.66.182]: 450 4.7.1
Alex:
> Hi,
>
> I'm running an older version of postfix and a 2.6.35 Linux kernel, and
> recently started seeing these messages:
>
> Aug 14 19:52:01 smtp01 postfix/postsuper[2634]: fatal: setuid(103):
> Resource temporarily unavailable
>
> How can I troubleshoot this?
On many systems setuid() i
Alex:
> For reference, there was nothing further in the system or postfix
> logs, dmesg, or even by increasing the postfix logging level to the
> best of my ability.
When the kernel reports "Resource temporarily unavailable", that's
all that Postfix can report without second-guessing the kernel.
Alex:
> Hi,
>
> >> For reference, there was nothing further in the system or postfix
> >> logs, dmesg, or even by increasing the postfix logging level to the
> >> best of my ability.
> >
> > When the kernel reports "Resource temporarily unavailable", that's
> > all that Postfix can report without
Stan Hoeppner:
> Google uses less than 1/10th of 1% "Enterprise grade" hardware, using the
> typical definition of "Enterprise grade", in their operations. And Google is
> the undisputed single largest operator of servers on the planet. I think that
> qualifies them as an "Enterprise". ;)
Indeed
Stan Hoeppner:
> Wietse Venema put forth on 8/16/2010 2:36 PM:
> > Stan Hoeppner:
> >> Google uses less than 1/10th of 1% "Enterprise grade" hardware, using the
> >> typical definition of "Enterprise grade", in their operations. And Google
> &g
Zhou, Yan:
> Hi there,
>
> I have defined my own process to handle all incoming emails, by using a
> local transport. My master.cf has entry like this, where the Python
> script delegates each mail processing to somewhere else.
>
> connector unix - n n - - pi
Zhou, Yan:
> >
> > By default, Postfix delivery decisions are based solely on envelope
> > recipient addresses. If you send mail to a non-existent address,
> > then the non-delivery report will be sent to your email address.
> >
> > You can configure Postfix via access(5), header_checks(5) and
>
p...@alt-ctrl-del.org:
> I take it that I am expected to bottom post here. But is it ok, if I crop
> out parts of the original message (if it's long)?
Yes.
Wietse
Morten P.D. Stevens:
> Hi,
>
> is there a greet_pause feature in postfix comparable with the sendmail
> greet_pause feature?
>
> For example: FEATURE(`greet_pause',5000)
If you have a zombie problem, then delaying every SMTP session
is a terrible idea.
The expirimental Postfix release has a be
Morten P.D. Stevens:
> is there a greet_pause feature in postfix comparable with the
> sendmail greet_pause feature?
>
> For example: FEATURE(`greet_pause',5000)
Wietse:
> If you have a zombie problem, then delaying every SMTP session
> is a terrible idea.
>
> The expirimental Postfix release has
Jordan Russell:
> Whenever cron (cronie-1.4.5-2.fc13.i686 on Fedora 13) sends mail to a
> non-root local user, e.g.:
>
>12 * * * * someuser echo test
In which file is this? /etc/crontab does not document the use of
username fields in my Fedora 13 test box, nor would I expect to
see username
Jordan Russell:
> Should I just ignore the warnings from postfix? Does invoking sendmail
> this way present any sort of security risk?
I think it is bogus fron cron to invoke (mail or other) commands
with EUID root and UID non-root.
Wietse
Alex:
> Aug 6 09:44:20 smtp01 postfix/smtp[24772]: setting up TLS connection
> to mail.messaging.microsoft.com
> Aug 6 09:44:20 smtp01 postfix/smtp[24772]: Peer verification:
> CommonName in certificate does not match:
> mail.global.frontbridge.com != mail.messaging.microsoft.com
The certificate
Edward avanti:
> Halo list,
>
> We have thousands domain and user, we have two different configuration, we
> now look to make one.
>
> Anyone suggest how have postfix virtual deliver binary, deliver mail to
> format of
> /virtual/domain_first letter/domain_second
> letter/domain_third_letter/doma
Squeeshh Me:
> Aug 21 11:12:55 node1 kernel: pid 40382 (virtual), uid 5000: exited on
> signal 6
For details, look in your MAILLOG file.
Wietse
http://www.postfix.org/DEBUG_README.html#logging
Look for obvious signs of trouble
Postfix logs all failed and successful deliveries to a logf
Squeeshh Me:
> Hi,
>
> Thanks for replying. My bad, I realised I posted the log message from
> /var/log/message. It's quite similar to what I get in postfix log
> too. Here's the postfix /var/log/mailog version of a test mail that I just
> sent, hope this is better (also there are no other warnin
Squeeshh Me:
> Wietse: ok, here it is:
> egrep '(warning|error|fatal|panic):' /var/log/maillog | more
>
> Aug 22 21:50:17 node2 postfix/virtual[71240]: panic: file size limit
> 100 < message size 1498997.
Your Postfix version was modified with an unofficial patch
that implements quota in th
Stan Hoeppner:
> That's not necessarily true. It depends on the order of his
> smtpd_*_restrictions and whether he's using delayed evaluation. If he's
> using the multiple section restrictions style with delayed eval it's
> possible he may have an "OK" in a later table that causes the mail to be
Erik Logtenberg:
> Hi,
>
> I wrote a small milter using Sendmail::Milter in perl. This worked okay
> with postfix 2.6.5, but it doesn't with 2.7.0. I use the i-macro
> (postfix queue-id) in the EOM-callback function. Previously, the i-macro
> was always set at this stage, but now this is no longer
listadecorreo:
[ Charset ISO-8859-1 unsupported, converting... ]
> Hi to all
>
> In the configuration of my main.cf, I have all mail sent to an external
> server (relayhost) I can do to check if the server is operational and if
> it fails to send all mail to another server
>
> relayhost=xxx.xxx
Jose Ildefonso Camargo Tolosa:
> I have to ask: is there a way of making postfix rewrite Date header to
> server's time for authenticated mail? (or at list for a range of IPs),
No, but it is possible to delete the Date: header for mail that
is received via the submission service.
In the master.cf
Noel Jones:
[ Charset UTF-8 unsupported, converting... ]
> On 8/23/2010 8:48 AM, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> > * p...@alt-ctrl-del.org:
> >> I find that a lot of spam comes from recently registered, throw away
> >> domains. The new domain may be used as the sender, hostname, or name
> >> server.
> >>
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 01:41:20PM -0500, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> Anyway, if you had the time and inclination and were able to get
> your hands on a few units, it would be great to see some basic
> queue performance data from you on SSD vs a disk based test rig
> you use.
Victor Duchovni:
> All ben
listadecorreo:
> > See: http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#smtp_fallback_relay
> >
> Thanks a lot i'm using smtp_fallback_relay but show tis error
>
> Aug 23 19:27:52 jupiter postfix/smtpd[15705]: ECC30EA056:
> client=unknown[10.111.100.100]
> Aug 23 19:27:55 jupiter postfix/c
Pablo Garcia Melga:
> Hi, I have a group of domains, that can't cope with our delivery rate,
> I need to send them mail at most at 1/second, how should I achieve
> that ?
> I tried to create a new transport in master.cf and reroute these
> domains thru this transpor but it doesn't seems to work.
>
Charles Marcus:
> On 2010-08-22 8:38 PM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> > Stan Hoeppner put forth on 8/22/2010 7:34 PM:
> >> So if we reverse the scenario and put the "REJECT" first, it's a final
> >> decision? If so, and if I've described the situation correctly, why do
> >> we have this opposite behavi
Pablo Garcia Melga:
> I added the following lines to the configuration
>
> master.cf
>
> smtpslow unix - - n - - smtp
>
> transport
>
> yahoo.com smtpslow:
> yahoo.com.ar smtpslow:
> yahoo.com.mx smtpslow:
> ymail.com smtpslow:
>
> main.cf
>
> transpo
Stan Hoeppner:
> Wietse Venema put forth on 8/23/2010 10:11 AM:
> > Noel Jones:
>
> > (Might be time to revisit DNS whitelists in
> >> postfix.)
> >
> > Maybe someone can draft a strawman user interface:
> >
> > - what is the configu
Mike:
> Aug 24 17:21:48 sato postfix/virtual[581]: warning: recipient
> m...@example.com: bad uid example.com/mike/ 3001 3001 in
> virtual_uid_maps
Please RTFM the documentation.
http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#virtual_uid_maps
http://www.postfix.org/virtual.8.html
Wietse
Ram:
> I have a custom milter for userwise blacklists/whitelists I have been
> running with postfix 2.3.4
>
>
> Now when I upgraded to postfix 2.7 I get this error
>
> "can't read SMFIC_DATA reply packet header: Success"
>
> This works if I use milter_protocol=2. But how do I build my milte
Wietse Venema:
> Ram:
> > I have a custom milter for userwise blacklists/whitelists I have been
> > running with postfix 2.3.4
> >
> >
> > Now when I upgraded to postfix 2.7 I get this error
> >
> > "can't read SMFIC_DATA repl
Stan Hoeppner:
> Noel Jones put forth on 8/24/2010 2:18 PM:
>
> > - This is specific for dnswl.org. Postfix needs a general mechanism.
> > Other whitelists are not required to follow dnswl.org's 127.0.x.y
> > mechanism.
>
> Yeah, I used this example as dnswl is, afaik, the most "established" of
Stefan Foerster:
> Hello world,
>
> I am concerned about those log entries:
>
> Aug 24 21:16:51 drought postfix/pickup[23165]: fatal: watchdog timeout
> Aug 24 21:16:52 drought postfix/master[4713]: warning: process
> /usr/libexec/postfix/pickup pid 23165 exit status 1
> Aug 24 21:33:31 drought
Zhou, Yan:
> Hi there,
>
> We want to implement SMTP authentication in Postfix and support multiple
> virtual domains. Rather than having user/domain/endpoint in different
> files, we prefer them either in database (Oracle) or LDAP. I am trying
> to weigh the pros and cons of both options. I have
Patrick Ben Koetter:
> > There currently exists no Oracle client for Postfix. Maybe someone
> > can donate an ODBC (or other cross-platform) client. It would be
> > a little slower, but would allow Postfix to talk to lots of databases
> > without needing a driver for everything and the kitchen sink
Noel Jones:
> As I see it, there are two complementary paths we can take
> with DNS whitelists, each with a slightly different purpose.
> While these are both useful, neither depends on the other, so
> postfix can implement either or both.
I'll read the entire proposal later.
Would this notatio
Noel Jones:
> On 8/25/2010 4:27 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> > Noel Jones:
> >> As I see it, there are two complementary paths we can take
> >> with DNS whitelists, each with a slightly different purpose.
> >> While these are both useful, neither depends on the
Matthias Leisi:
> On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 11:27 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
>
> > ?dnswl1.example.com=127.0.0.2*weight1, dnswl2.example.com=127.0.0.1*weight2
> > ?dnsbl3.example.com=127.0.0.3*weight3, dnsbl4.example.com=127.0.0.1*weight4
>
> What about wildcarding? dns
Stan Hoeppner:
> Wietse Venema put forth on 8/25/2010 4:27 PM:
> > Noel Jones:
> >> As I see it, there are two complementary paths we can take
> >> with DNS whitelists, each with a slightly different purpose.
> >> While these are both useful, neither depend
Daniel Prieto:
> Is there a substitute 'vacation' feature from Sendmail for Postfix for
> all my users? Is Postfix.admin the best bet?
> I compiled vacation on my linux box and enable my .forward file with
> \user1, "|/usr/bin/vacation user1" but the sender doesn't get a
> 'vacation' message bac
Zhou, Yan:
> Hi There,
>
> What version of LDAP interface does Postfix 2.4.x support?
Try: the Postfix 2.4 LDAP_README file.
Wietse
Noel Jones:
> This looks like a useful concept. If we use "*" as an octet
> wildcard, we'll need to use something else as the weight
> modifier. dnsbl_site=127.0.*.3w1 seems reasonable.
You can't use an alphanumerical operator such as "w", because the
"=127.0.*.3" portion is optional.
Noel Jones:
> This looks like a useful concept. If we use "*" as an octet
> wildcard, we'll need to use something else as the weight modifier.
> dnsbl_site=127.0.*.3w1 seems reasonable.
On 8/26/2010 2:28 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> You can't use an alphanumerical o
Daniel Prieto:
> So what is the alternative to vacation for Postfix?
On 8/26/2010 11:15 AM, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> Huh? Why alternative? The "normal" vacation works just fine.
> Just read the manpage, there are options to answer to every mail etc.
Daniel Prieto:
> I've used it for a long
On 8/26/2010 4:14 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> The more precise solution is to implement wildcards with ranges:
>
> example.com=127.0.[0-128].3*1
> example.com=127.0.[0-5,6-9].3*1
Noel Jones:
> I like the range idea. You want proto docs reflecting that
> syntax?
Yes, that woul
Lie, Jafaruddin:
> There's an ASA 5500 inbetween, but the SMTP fixup protocol has been turned
> off,
Prove it.
Wietse
1501 - 1600 of 14030 matches
Mail list logo
