,
Bussi Andrea
Joe
-Original Message-
From: Bussi Andrea [mailto:bu...@mfn.unipmn.it]
Sent: Monday, March 25, 2013 11:07 AM
To: pound@apsis.ch
Subject: Re: [Pound Mailing List] Location comparision with backend
address host
On 03/18/2013 09:43 AM, Bussi
On 03/18/2013 09:43 AM, Bussi Andrea wrote:
On 03/16/2013 09:30 AM, Raj Kishore1/CHN/TCS wrote:
Hi Joe,
Thanks for the previous replies.
We have modified the pound 1.9 socket structures to listen IPV4/ipv6
address.
However when IPV4 request comes,it is mapped to IPV6 address as
the same result.
Joe
-Original Message-
From: Bussi Andrea [mailto:bu...@mfn.unipmn.it]
Sent: Monday, March 25, 2013 11:07 AM
To: pound@apsis.ch
Subject: Re: [Pound Mailing List] Location comparision with backend
address host
On 03/18/2013 09:43 AM, Bussi Andrea wrote:
On 03/16/2013
On 03/16/2013 09:30 AM, Raj Kishore1/CHN/TCS wrote:
Hi Joe,
Thanks for the previous replies.
We have modified the pound 1.9 socket structures to listen IPV4/ipv6
address.
However when IPV4 request comes,it is mapped to IPV6 address as
:::X.X.X.X
In case of IPV6 client, it is fetching the
2013 21:42:39 +0530 (IST)
Subject: RE: [Pound Mailing List] Location comparision with backend address
host
IPv6 support was added in v2.4, and is available in the current release (v2.6)
It’s as easy as:
$ host www.sapphireschoolnurse.com
www.sapphireschoolnurse.com has address 67.216.66.153
Hi Joe,
Thanks for your reply. No our clients arent proxies. However we are using
pound 1.9 version to make it to support dual stack.
Few additional questions
1) Does the latest version support wild card interfaces as in 1.9 version?
2) In Pound 2.4, why is there a break for TCP socket in
.
Joe
From: Raj Kishore1/CHN/TCS [mailto:raj.kisho...@tcs.com]
Sent: Monday, March 11, 2013 8:52 AM
To: pound@apsis.ch
Subject: RE: [Pound Mailing List] Location comparision with backend address
host
Hi Joe,
Thanks for your reply. No our clients arent proxies. However we are using
pound 1.9