I thought I posted this already, but it hasn't shown up on the list, so here
goes:
Those of you who have swapped a passive 1400 screen for an active one, is the
difference that radical?
Is the 1400c screen as sharp as a typical small desktop monitor?
Any suggestions for sources for the 1400c sc
metimes a little too sharp
as text and such looks a bit more jaggy ;)
Scott Holder
-Original Message-
From: PowerBooks [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
Spencer Carter
Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 12:15 PM
To: PowerBooks
Subject: 1400cs vs 1400c screens
I thought I posted
>
>Those of you who have swapped a passive 1400 screen for an active one, is the
>difference that radical?
>
>Is the 1400c screen as sharp as a typical small desktop monitor?
>
>Any suggestions for sources for the 1400c screen other than eBay?
I can't say about the 1400 displays 'cos I don't have
; as text and such looks a bit more jaggy ;)
>
> Scott Holder
>
> -Original Message-
> From: PowerBooks [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
> Spencer Carter
> Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 12:15 PM
> To: PowerBooks
> Subject: 1400cs vs 1400c screens
>
>
> Those of you who have swapped a passive 1400 screen for an active one, is the
> difference that radical?
Yes, yes, yes.
> Is the 1400c screen as sharp as a typical small desktop monitor?
Sharp, yes. Colour perfect, no. The screen is a bit washed out compared to
a CRT, but no LCD is as good an
>I thought I posted this already, but it hasn't shown up on the list, so here
>goes:
>
>Those of you who have swapped a passive 1400 screen for an active one, is the
>difference that radical?
>
>Is the 1400c screen as sharp as a typical small desktop monitor?
Neither the passive or active is bad.
