Nice idea, Adrian.
Maybe we can fill a table like this (please view in monospace):
|min RAM |max RAM|
| jiffy | slow | jiffy | slow |
pb 100 | 6 | 7.1 | 7.1 | 8.0 |
pb 135 | 7.0 | 7.1 | 7.1 | 8.0
Nice idea, Adrian.
Maybe we can fill a table like this (please view in monospace):
|min RAM |max RAM|
| jiffy | slow | jiffy | slow |
pb 100 | 6 | 7.1 | 7.1 | 8.0 |
pb 135 | 7.0 | 7.1 | 7.1 | 8.0
Le 04-05-2005 14:00, « [NOM] » [ADRESSE] a écrit :
I did :-), I managed to get it working but idd very very slow.
For the try nice, but not for working. Works only with an external
Keyboard and mouse through a USB pcmcia card.
See my picture:
/05, Fluxstringer wrote:
To: PowerBooks powerbooks@mail.maclaunch.com
From: Fluxstringer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Panther on 2400/3400?
Cc:
Bcc:
X-Attachments:
So now that XPostFacto v3.1 supports 10.2 on 603/604 Macs, has anyone
tried it yet on either 2400 or 3400?
Offhand it sounds like
Le 04-05-2005 14:00, « [NOM] » [ADRESSE] a écrit :
I did :-), I managed to get it working but idd very very slow.
For the try nice, but not for working. Works only with an external
Keyboard and mouse through a USB pcmcia card.
See my picture:
But that Golden Ratio of OS version spec to CPU spec would lead a
lot more users to a harmoniously balanced system.
Which would give longer lasting joy.
If it were only that simple; while you can count on the CPU's, my
experience is that each OS has it's strengths weaknesses, quirks
holes,
On 5/6/05, Geoffrey Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But that Golden Ratio of OS version spec to CPU spec would lead a
lot more users to a harmoniously balanced system.
Which would give longer lasting joy.
If it were only that simple; while you can count on the CPU's, my
experience is
I have a PB1400/133/64MB that has OS 8.6 because it suits the PB best.
OS 9.1 would give me more choices in software but it's not worth
bogging down the PB to do it. And OS 8.6 is much more stable than OS
9xx is anyway. Higher numbers are not always better.
just my .02 worth.
--
Ron
Pretty much
On 5/6/05, Geoffrey Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a PB1400/133/64MB that has OS 8.6 because it suits the PB best.
OS 9.1 would give me more choices in software but it's not worth
bogging down the PB to do it. And OS 8.6 is much more stable than OS
9xx is anyway. Higher numbers are not
What's that saying? Your mileage may vary.
gwd
My issue with OS 9 is that after time the drive will need to be
reformatted and the OS will need to be re-installed because for some
reason the OS hoses itself. And OS 9 Ia more of a RAM hog too.
Have run OS 9 for 3 years never hosed.
As the man
I have a PB1400/133/64MB that has OS 8.6 because it suits the PB best.
OS 9.1 would give me more choices in software but it's not worth
bogging down the PB to do it. And OS 8.6 is much more stable than OS
9xx is anyway. Higher numbers are not always better.
just my .02 worth.
--
Ron
I did :-), I managed to get it working but idd very very slow.
For the try nice, but not for working. Works only with an external
Keyboard and mouse through a USB pcmcia card.
See my picture:
http://forum.macosx.nl/viewtopic.php?p=413655highlight=3400+osx#413655
So now that XPostFacto v3.1
I did :-), I managed to get it working but idd very very slow.
For the try nice, but not for working. Works only with an external
Keyboard and mouse through a USB pcmcia card.
See my picture:
http://forum.macosx.nl/viewtopic.php?p=413655highlight=3400+osx#413655
Vie langzamm ist es?
Also would take like 4 hours of pain and frustration!
On 5/3/05, Fluxstringer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So now that XPostFacto v3.1 supports 10.2 on 603/604 Macs, has anyone
tried it yet on either 2400 or 3400?
Offhand it sounds like a sure receipe for a major case of the slows
--
Adrian
On May 3, 2005, at 4:55 AM, Noah Wood wrote:
Also would take like 4 hours of pain and frustration!
And that's just booting up! :-P
--
Bruce Johnson
University of Arizona
College of Pha rmacy
Information Technology Group
Institutions do not have opinions, merely customs
--
PowerBooks is sponsored
Id go with 8 or maybe 9
On 5/3/05, Bruce Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On May 3, 2005, at 4:55 AM, Noah Wood wrote:
Also would take like 4 hours of pain and frustration!
And that's just booting up! :-P
--
Bruce Johnson
University of Arizona
College of Pha rmacy
Information
I find that 3400 just loves OS 8.6
Pete.
--- Noah Wood [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Id go with 8 or maybe 9
On 5/3/05, Bruce Johnson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On May 3, 2005, at 4:55 AM, Noah Wood wrote:
Also would take like 4 hours of pain and
frustration!
And that's just booting
PETE wrote:
I find that 3400 just loves OS 8.6
Pete.
--- Noah Wood [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I guess part of all of this is trying something out just to try it out,
which I do all the time (with computers that is.) My old G3 beige takes
forever to boot with 10.2 Jaguar while my 3400cs take
So now that XPostFacto v3.1 supports 10.2 on 603/604 Macs, has anyone
tried it yet on either 2400 or 3400?
dan k
.
http://macdan.n3.net/
carracho://dankephoto.dhs.org:9700
hotline://dankephoto.dhs.org:9500
.
--
PowerBooks is
So now that XPostFacto v3.1 supports 10.2 on 603/604 Macs, has anyone
tried it yet on either 2400 or 3400?
Offhand it sounds like a sure receipe for a major case of the slows
--
Adrian
--
PowerBooks is sponsored by http://lowendmac.com/ and...
Small Dog Electronicshttp://www.smalldog.com
20 matches
Mail list logo
