Re: view full headers shortcut failing again

2003-02-05 Thread A-NO-NE Music
Jerry M. Keller / 03.2.5 / 2:50 PM wrote: It works for me too, if the message is not already selected prior to the option-click. My problem is that I send spam messages back to my spam program website and can not find a way of including the full headers as part of my forwarding of the message to

Re: PM - IPNR gatway(dialup)

2003-02-05 Thread Peter Sichel
I am using PM on a powermac running OS X and I am running IPNetRouter on an iMac sharing a dial-up (on demand) connection. When I get or send with PM the timeout occurs before the dial up connection is made and I have to be present and wait to dismiss the error message before reconnecting. I

Re: Feature Request

2003-02-05 Thread Ben Kennedy
On 05 2 2003 at 3:28 pm -0500, Bill wrote: Sorry if this feature has already been requested. I would like the multi- message find to be able to find things in the message headers. This works if you search a single message with Show Headers turned on, but not for a multi-message search. Speaking

Feature Request

2003-02-05 Thread Bill
Sorry if this feature has already been requested. I would like the multi- message find to be able to find things in the message headers. This works if you search a single message with Show Headers turned on, but not for a multi-message search.

Re: view full headers shortcut failing again

2003-02-05 Thread Jerry M. Keller
Jerry Keller writes: It works for me too, if the message is not already selected prior to the option-click. My problem is that I send spam messages back to my spam program website and can not find a way of including the full headers as part of my forwarding of the message to them. The headers do

PM - IPNR gatway(dialup)

2003-02-05 Thread martin
I am using PM on a powermac running OS X and I am running IPNetRouter on an iMac sharing a dial-up (on demand) connection. When I get or send with PM the timeout occurs before the dial up connection is made and I have to be present and wait to dismiss the error message before reconnecting. I

Re: view full headers shortcut failing again

2003-02-05 Thread Ben Kennedy
On 05 2 2003 at 1:21 pm -0500, H.R. Riggs wrote: It seems to work if the message is not currently selected. It doesn't work if you're looking at the message and then option-click to see the headers. Well, not for me. :) -b -- Ben Kennedy, chief magician zygoat creative technical services

Re: view full headers shortcut failing again

2003-02-05 Thread H.R. Riggs
It seems to work if the message is not currently selected. It doesn't work if you're looking at the message and then option-click to see the headers. Rick Lecoat wrote on 2/5/03: Received from: Ben Kennedy At: 5:52 pm (GMT) on Wed, Feb 5, 2003 So since I've updated to 4.1.2, I've noticed that

Re: view full headers shortcut failing again

2003-02-05 Thread Rick Lecoat
Received from: Ben Kennedy At: 5:52 pm (GMT) on Wed, Feb 5, 2003 So since I've updated to 4.1.2, I've noticed that option-clicking on a message in the list no longer displays the full header info. I need to go up to the menu and expressly turn on the option (which then affects all messages

Re(2): Unexpected Error-what=100,when=6,err+69

2003-02-05 Thread Tom Dillon
Mark Gerber said some stuff then sez: I haven't had the problem since then. Thanks for the info. -- Tom Dillon12081 W. Alameda Parkway DataCraft

Re: Re(2): [4.1.2] command+M for send to dock?

2003-02-05 Thread Mirko Kranenburg
Nothing like a well forged parable to brighten up your day Received from: jo At: 9:31 am (GMT) on Wed, Feb 5, 2003 Are you saying WindowShadeX is dangerous? Or is the insane ape something else? Most insane apes are fine provided you take steps not to anger them. The primary steps that

Re(2): [4.1.2] command+M for send to dock?

2003-02-05 Thread Takehiko Abe
jo wrote: You must have installed one of 'system enhancement' hacks -- likely the insane APE hack. Be aware that they're DANGEROUS! really?? I don't recall installing any insane apes... OK... I *did* install WindowShadeX. Completely forgot I did this. It used to be so handy pre-OSX...

Re(2): [4.1.2] command+M for send to dock?

2003-02-05 Thread Rick Lecoat
Received from: jo At: 9:31 am (GMT) on Wed, Feb 5, 2003 Are you saying WindowShadeX is dangerous? Or is the insane ape something else? Most insane apes are fine provided you take steps not to anger them. The primary steps that you should take should be to prevent placing them in situations

Re(2): [4.1.2] command+M for send to dock?

2003-02-05 Thread jo
500 billion (or so) years ago, the universe was born... not much else has happened since, until Wed, Feb 5, 2003 at 9:27 PM, PST, when Takehiko Abe burst forth with this important announcement: You must have installed one of 'system enhancement' hacks -- likely the insane APE hack. Be aware

Re: [4.1.2] command+M for send to dock?

2003-02-05 Thread Takehiko Abe
Ben Kennedy wrote: On 05 2 2003 at 8:10 pm -0500, Takehiko Abe wrote: Minimize Window is misleading! Please rename it to Suck to Dock and change its shortcut to command+shift+option+control+Suck. In my opinion, Apple has really screwed up with their recommendations for cmd-M = minimize

Re: [4.1.2] command+M for send to dock?

2003-02-05 Thread Takehiko Abe
jo wrote: Minimize Window is misleading! Please rename it to Suck to Dock and change its shortcut to command+shift+option+control+Suck. ** Actually I sent this message to dock twice... Agh! doesn't suck it to the dock here---instead it turns it into a ghost. You must have installed

Re: [4.1.2] command+M for send to dock?

2003-02-05 Thread Takehiko Abe
kenichi kikuchi wrote: At 10:10 AM +0900 2/5/03, Takehiko Abe wrote: Minimize Window is misleading! Please rename it to Suck to Dock and change its shortcut to command+shift+option+control+Suck. Some things that the users can do: 1. Remap command-m to command-l in Keyboard Maestro's Hot

Re(2): Unexpected Error-what=100,when=6,err+69

2003-02-05 Thread Mark Gerber
There was a time (Tue, Feb 4, 2003 at 7:13 PM) when Tom Dillon said this thing: Mark Gerber sez: I received the following error several times during the process: Unexpected Error on mail.earthlink.net Class=DB, what=100m when =6, err=69 I see this occasionally on my machine too. If someone

Re: [4.1.2] command+M for send to dock?

2003-02-05 Thread kenichi kikuchi
At 10:10 AM +0900 2/5/03, Takehiko Abe wrote: Minimize Window is misleading! Please rename it to Suck to Dock and change its shortcut to command+shift+option+control+Suck. Some things that the users can do: 1. Remap command-m to command-l in Keyboard Maestro's Hot Keys feature. 2. Modify

Re: [4.1.2] command+M for send to dock?

2003-02-05 Thread jo
500 billion (or so) years ago, the universe was born... not much else has happened since, until Wed, Feb 5, 2003 at 5:10 PM, PST, when Takehiko Abe burst forth with this important announcement: Minimize Window is misleading! Please rename it to Suck to Dock and change its shortcut to

Re: [4.1.2] command+M for send to dock?

2003-02-05 Thread Ben Kennedy
On 05 2 2003 at 8:10 pm -0500, Takehiko Abe wrote: Minimize Window is misleading! Please rename it to Suck to Dock and change its shortcut to command+shift+option+control+Suck. In my opinion, Apple has really screwed up with their recommendations for cmd-M = minimize to dock and cmd-H = hide

[4.1.2] command+M for send to dock?

2003-02-05 Thread Takehiko Abe
Minimize Window is misleading! Please rename it to Suck to Dock and change its shortcut to command+shift+option+control+Suck. ** Actually I sent this message to dock twice... Agh! -- Honor thy error as a hidden intention.

Store etc and so on ...

2003-02-05 Thread nico nuzzaci
I would like to receive different tips and tricks on how you guys do backups etc and so on. I also wonder why the 'Convert To Xml' apple script Written by: w. eric tyson not working for me. I just get this error: Convert to XML is compatable with PowerMail 3.0.5

Re: powermail-discuss Sent Mail

2003-02-05 Thread H.R. Riggs
I have it put in the folder ~Sent Mail (that's a tilde) so that the folder shows up right below the Out Tray. This is similar to Emailer's positioning, as I recall, which I find convenient. Ron Ira Lansing wrote on 2/4/03: Can someone point me to a reference for 'sent mail' or indicate how and