Re: Pics from the Address Book

2005-05-28 Thread Mikael Byström
Lyle, I agree pics or other info from the addressbook would be cool. Lyle said: >By the way, the truncated message has me investigating PowerMail >seriously again. I am very impressed with it. I used Emailer since 1.1v3, well into Mac OS X and have found since 2004 that PowerMail is a worthy

Re: How to get False Positives into spamsieve?

2005-05-28 Thread A-NO-NE Music
Michael Tsai / 2005/05/27 / 09:13 PM wrote: >You can check SpamSieve's log for yourself and see if there is >a "Predicted: Spam" entry for the message in question. Chiming in. I have been in this loop as well. Just tonight, once again, from a sender who is not on my address book but has excha

Re: PowerMail crashes with 10.4.1

2005-05-28 Thread Chuck Joiner
>I just upgraded to OX 10.4 and then updated to 10.4.1. Now, PM 5.2 >crashes whenever I try to create a new message, open an existing >message, or optimize my search index. I sent a crash log to Jerome, but >I'm hoping that someone here can help. I noticed from an earlier message >the suggestion o

Re: How to get False Positives into spamsieve?

2005-05-28 Thread Michael Tsai
On May 27, 2005, at 8:07 PM, Lane Roathe wrote: > I am trying to get false positives (ie, email that is NOT spam but > gets > marked as such) sent back to spamsieve so it can update it's stats. You should use the "Mark as Good" command. > However, no matter what I try so far spamsieve reports

Q: PM 5.2 and Spotlight

2005-05-28 Thread Mark Smith
I am still using OS X 10.3.9, but now that PM supports Spotlight searches, I have a reason to consider upgrading to Tiger when I go into town to do some shopping this weekend. How good is PM's/SpotLight's search? What happens when you find a message in a database that is not the default databa

How to get False Positives into spamsieve?

2005-05-28 Thread Lane Roathe
I am trying to get false positives (ie, email that is NOT spam but gets marked as such) sent back to spamsieve so it can update it's stats. However, no matter what I try so far spamsieve reports 0 false positives and (of course) all such email is still getting marked as spam. On the otherhand, if

Re: Feature Request: GROWL

2005-05-28 Thread Lally Singh
Ok I love you. On 5/27/05, Karel Gillissen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > You can turn them off in the preferences: > Go to Preferences -> notifications > > Karel > > Op vrijdag, 27 mei 2005 schreef Lally Singh: > > >Hi. The one thing that gets me about PM is that every time I open up > >my lap

Re: IMAP strategies

2005-05-28 Thread listes
Barbara Needham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The partial solution I have found is to download my mail by pop [leave > messages on server] and connect by IMAP. [dot mac server, that may make a > difference]. This enables spam to be deleted by the pop download and at > the later imap connection it

Re: IMAP strategies

2005-05-28 Thread Barbara Needham
listes on 5/27/05 said >Daniele Procida <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> is it possible to filter IMAP mail? > >As far as I remember, the couple Powermail/Spamsieve that existed one >year ago (many version upgrades since then) *did* allow SpamSieve to >filter IMAP email, but I tested it only to "c

Re: Feature Request: GROWL

2005-05-28 Thread Karel Gillissen
You can turn them off in the preferences: Go to Preferences -> notifications Karel Op vrijdag, 27 mei 2005 schreef Lally Singh: >Hi. The one thing that gets me about PM is that every time I open up >my laptop, the dock icon bounces incessantly until I click OK on each >of three different "No

Feature Request: GROWL

2005-05-28 Thread Lally Singh
Hi. The one thing that gets me about PM is that every time I open up my laptop, the dock icon bounces incessantly until I click OK on each of three different "No POP server on X" dialogs. I donno how many others it bothers, but I know it's constantly making me think of other mail clients to look

Re: PGP 9/OS X 10.4.1/PowerMail 5.1

2005-05-28 Thread Lally Singh
Btw, PGP 9's not tiger certified yet! (odd, I know) On 5/27/05, John Keegan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>Has anyone used the new PGP 9 with PowerMail in Tiger? The old > >>Applescripts for encryption and decryption don't seem to work on this > >>new version of PGP... > > > >Anyone have any idea

Re: IMAP strategies

2005-05-28 Thread listes
Daniele Procida <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > is it possible to filter IMAP mail? As far as I remember, the couple Powermail/Spamsieve that existed one year ago (many version upgrades since then) *did* allow SpamSieve to filter IMAP email, but I tested it only to "color" mails, I don't know wethe

Re: PGP 9/OS X 10.4.1/PowerMail 5.1

2005-05-28 Thread listes
John Keegan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > To followup on my own question, it turns out the problem is with PGP 9's > most current beta (9.0.1 Beta 2), there is no Applescript support so that > is the culprit right there. So if you need PGP support w/Powermail, and > are using Applescript to do the