Re: Crash report 5.5

Bruce Barrett ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) on 2006-11-01 19:32 said: > Had my first crash since using PM 5.5, I've dropped the crash log here: > > >I was, I believe, trying to do a reply all. (Though as I recall >I may have been doing something else

Re: Sloppy thinking in sigs (was"Re: 2 features I'd like"

On or about Wed, 1 Nov 2006 21:06:17 -0500 C. A. Niemiec said - >>Moreover, encouraging users to put new content at the top of an email >>makes it much easier to parse new information out of the latest email in >>a trail of emails; since most non-technical email users (now the vast >>majority) don

Re: Sloppy thinking in sigs (was"Re: 2 features I'd like"

>Moreover, encouraging users to put new content at the top of an email >makes it much easier to parse new information out of the latest email in >a trail of emails; since most non-technical email users (now the vast >majority) don't know about commenting and inline responses, suggesting >that new c

Re: Crash report 5.5

Bruce Barrett / 2006/11/01 / 07:32 PM wrote: > Had my first crash since using PM 5.5, I've dropped the crash log here: > > >I was, I believe, trying to do a reply all. (Though as I recall >I may have been doing something else at about the s

Crash report 5.5

Hi All, Had my first crash since using PM 5.5, I've dropped the crash log here: I was, I believe, trying to do a reply all. (Though as I recall I may have been doing something else at about the same time.) Thanks, Bruce MacBook Pro, 2G

Re: Sloppy thinking in sigs (was"Re: 2 features I'd like"

Moreover, encouraging users to put new content at the top of an email makes it much easier to parse new information out of the latest email in a trail of emails; since most non-technical email users (now the vast majority) don't know about commenting and inline responses, suggesting that new conten

Sloppy thinking in sigs (was"Re: 2 features I'd like"

marco osti said it like this: >A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. >Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? >A: Top-posting. >Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail? Question: Why is this quote so meaningless? Answer: Because it assumes all me

Re: 2GB limit: the Official Pronouncement

Mikael Byström (1/11/06 23:01) said: >The 2GB limitation can be tolerated, though one may lose a lot of time >trying to cope with it. I'm living with it for now, but I'll switch to a different client rather than split my database into different environments. I tried doing this a few years back, a