Re: 05/03/07-RC (PM ARCHIVE AND PM USER'S OS/PM VERSION)

2005-03-08 Thread C. A. Niemiec
2-Some individuals have given their input (Thanks!) on their OS, PM version, etc., but quite a few members have not responded, which makes me wonder whether they are receiving the List as a digest and how often/when that goes out (?) or whether my question is just being viewed as coming from a

Re: 05/03/07-RC (PM ARCHIVE AND PM USER'S OS/PM VERSION)

2005-03-08 Thread Barbara Needham
Rein Ciarfella on 3/7/05 said 3-So far not one other individual has mentioned that they are still at OS 9.1 or using PowerMail 4.2.1. I'm getting really lonely here! ;-) It took me a long time to decide to upgrade from 4.2, since it really met my needs. As far as 9.1, isn't 9.2 a free

Re: 05/03/07-RC (PM ARCHIVE AND PM USER'S OS/PM VERSION)

2005-03-08 Thread Raul Vera
Rein Ciarfella wrote: 2-Some individuals have given their input (Thanks!) on their OS, PM version, etc., but quite a few members have not responded, which makes me wonder whether they are receiving the List as a digest and how often/when that goes out (?) or whether my question is just being

Re: 05/03/07-RC (PM ARCHIVE AND PM USER'S OS/PM VERSION)

2005-03-08 Thread waynefb
3-So far not one other individual has mentioned that they are still at OS 9.1 or using PowerMail 4.2.1. I'm getting really lonely here! ;-) I think it's going to tough going for you in that arena. I know of only a few folks still on Mac OS 9 on a regular basis and most are on 9.2.x.

05/03/07-RC (PM ARCHIVE AND PM USER'S OS/PM VERSION)

2005-03-07 Thread Rein Ciarfella
1-My initial question was related to whether there existed a PM List archive and got transmuted to how many PM *List* saved messages a few individuals had. Someone then transmuted that to how many archived PM messages one had altogether. Although those are very interesting statistics to me (and